- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Black Range Rover hits and kills man on Ben Hur Rd, then leaves the scene.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:27 pm to Breauxsif
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:27 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
There would have been no reason not to stop if you had nothing to hide.
Got to think most sober people would stop to at least check the damage to their vehicle or to check on the animal they thought they hit to see if it was a pet.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:28 pm to tigersfirst
Are we having this conversation if it’s not a rosters son?
Naaaaaa It would be throw him under the jail!
2 criminal Justice systems,,,,,, Facts!
Naaaaaa It would be throw him under the jail!
2 criminal Justice systems,,,,,, Facts!
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:29 pm to The007
quote:
Are we having this conversation if it’s not a rosters son?
Some of us were having this conversation before the driver was ID'ed, so yea I'd say so.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:34 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Define "okay". It's legal to strike a pedestrian if they are crossing the street while not in a crosswalk, at night, with limited visibility.
That’s not necesssrily true. If you hit a guy on purpose it’s s crime.
You can’t just run people down that aren’t in s as crosswalk if you see them
.
quote:
It is definitely not legal to leave afterwards though.
I didn’t think do.
quote:
If there were other witnesses there to call 911, and render help to the victim, what "harm" was done by the driver leaving?
The state’s interest isn’t being served. If the driver was impaired he could hit someone else. It was his obligation to stay under the law.
quote:
. Not to mention they are probably going to argue that he wasn't aware that it was a person that he hit, and he didn't go to the police until he saw the report the following day.
They can argue anything, let’s hope the truth comes out and justice is done. And I have no idea exactly what the truth is.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:37 pm to jchamil
quote:
Got to think most sober people would stop to at least check the damage to their vehicle or to check on the animal they thought they hit to see if it was a pet.
Innocent until proven guilty here in America.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:42 pm to LSUSkip
Yeah its an ethical dilemma for sure
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:47 pm to 225Tyga
quote:
As they should and as it should. Him going to prison will do no good for anyone. He appears to be a clean cut, good young man with his whole life ahead of him. More importantly he appears to be someone that will contribute to society. Prison will do nothing. Right or wrong, it’s the truth.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:50 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:
Innocent until proven guilty here in America.
I guess it's a good thing I'm neither judge nor jury and just some random person speculating on a message board. You know it, I know it, and everyone reading this knows that the most likely scenario was he didn't stop because he was drunk
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:57 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
Let’s not victim blame here. The a-hole who hit this man and left the scene is the issue here
Actually if this dude doesn't cross the street with a vehicle on the way this never happens.
Facts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:59 pm to jchamil
quote:
I guess it's a good thing I'm neither judge nor jury and just some random person speculating on a message board. You know it, I know it, and everyone reading this knows that the most likely scenario was he didn't stop because he was drunk
That’s what you speculate, sure, but it’s not proof that he was drunk and fled the scene because he thought he hit a person
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:03 pm to Swagga
quote:
if this were a kid from inner city New Orleans or Baton Rouge the OT would be eating this up and demanding death sentence.
It's hilarious and sad.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:05 pm to LSUCOCK
quote:
Actually if this dude doesn't cross the street with a vehicle on the way this never happens. Facts
I thought he failed to cross the street?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:15 pm to saintsfan22
The driver is black isn’t he? So doesn’t that prove the OT is in fact not racist?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:23 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The driver is black isn’t he?
If he has the least detectable case of albinism ever. The highest of high yellas.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:23 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:
That’s what you speculate, sure, but it’s not proof that he was drunk and fled the scene because he thought he hit a person
So we aren't allowed to speculate on a message board? Again, you know that there is a 99.9% chance he didn't stop because he was drunk or otherwise impaired. Feel free to keep being obtuse I guess
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:27 pm to saintsfan22
When I googled the name this morning this is the picture that came up with him

Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:32 pm to lsupride87
That’s not the perp, Christ

Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:33 pm to Breauxsif
Yes, I see that now. His picture is everywhere. A quick google this morning and that picture is what came up
But it didn’t change my opinion at all when I thought he was black. The fact is crossing the road not in a crosswalk is illegal and makes this far more convoluted than some want to make it
But it didn’t change my opinion at all when I thought he was black. The fact is crossing the road not in a crosswalk is illegal and makes this far more convoluted than some want to make it
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:33 pm to doubleb
quote:
That’s not necesssrily true. If you hit a guy on purpose it’s s crime. You can’t just run people down that aren’t in s as crosswalk if you see them
Well no shite, that’s why I included the comment about it being dark with limited visibility. Those are parts of the argument that will point towards it not being intentional.
Popular
Back to top


1






