Started By
Message

re: Bizarre Math Question and Answer breaks the internet - Sorry if already posted

Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by StinkBait72
Member since Nov 2011
2057 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:09 pm to
Should have wrote it like this

48
2 (9+3) = 288

or

__48__
2(9+3) = 2

quote:

To me it comes down to how you read the ÷ symbol. Again the ÷ is ambiguous and there's a reason you won't see it past 8th grade.


The above is the correct answer. The debate will continue since the equation was poorly written.
Posted by southernelite
Dallas
Member since Sep 2009
53180 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Plug this in a cell in Excel and tell me what you get:

=48/2*(9+3)


Well you changed the problem, Excel gives an error as the problem is written.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96774 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

However, if / then its

48
____
2(9+3)

That's 2 since everything in the denominator should be worked first.
48
____
2(9+3) this is completely different
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20983 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

This thread is why textbooks write any equations with division in them as fractions.


Bingo.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84088 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

and MD are equal.


Yes
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167136 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by DanW1
Member since Jan 2013
1105 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:15 pm to
Division is a form of multiplication and multiplication is a form of addition.

Multiplication is a sum of the portions of a number.

So I'll hold hands here and guide any nonbelievers through.

48÷2(9+3) is 48÷2×12.

48÷2×12 is 48×.5×12.

Now it is all multiplication.

This can be written as:
48×.5×12=288 or a half (.5) portion of 48 (24), then 12 portions of 24 (288).

48×12×.5=288 or 12 portions of 48 (576), then a half (.5) portion of 576 (288).

12×.5×48=288 or a half (.5) portion of 12 (6), then 48 portions of 6 (288).

12×48×.5=288 or 48 portions of 12 (576), then a half (.5) portion of 576 (288).

Stick with me here, it's about to get crazy. (Maybe think of .5 as a half dollar coin?)

.5×12×48=288 or 12 portions of .5 (6) [12 half dollars gives you 6 full dollars], then 48 portions of 6 (288).

.5×48×12=288 or 48 portions of .5 (24) [48 half dollars gives you 24 full dollars ], then 12 portions of 24 (288).
Posted by DanW1
Member since Jan 2013
1105 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

You just changed my mind.


Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22031 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:21 pm to
I lost my arse in the last version of this thread. Answer is 288.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96774 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

I lost my arse in the last version of this thread.
I love this expression. Upvote to you
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20983 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:26 pm to
LINK

According to many sources, there is no right answer.

ETA- here's some physics guys talking abt it, also no consensus answer

LINK
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 3:49 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76832 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:30 pm to
PEMDAS
First reduction:
48/2(12)=48/2*12

Mult and division, like add/sub carry equal weight. Therefore process goes left to right if both exist inline.

Therefore Second reduction:

24*12

third reduction:

288
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35254 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

According to many sources, there is no right answer.
The problem is that while you can argue two answers, one answer (2) requires an assumption that is not stated. If you solve the problem as written, and don't assume anything that is not specified, the answer is 288. So while there may be 2 arguable answers, logically 288 is a superior answer (Occam's Razor).
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 3:35 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96774 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

The problem is that while you can argue two answers, one answer (2) requires an assumption that is not stated. If you solve the problem as written, and don't assume anything thay is not specified, the answer is 288
Yep. That has been my point the whole time. Just read the equation as written, dont try and assume all these crazy arse theories and rewrite it, and it is 288. dont worry about the ÷ or /, simply solve it as is with the ÷ symbol, and the answer can only be 288
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35254 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Yep. That has been my point the whole time. Just read the equation as written, dont try and assume all these crazy arse theories and rewrite it, and it is 288. dont worry about the ÷ or /, simply solve it as is with the ÷ symbol, and the answer can only be 288
I don't understand why that is so complicated. Besides if the portion after the ÷ is meant to be be enclosed, then it's not like there isn't text to show that. If a person was programming mathematical code in one of the many programs that require the parentheses (R, Excel, etc.) and failed to so, the excuse that it could be "technically" right if you make this assumption is not going to fly.
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 3:45 pm
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47192 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:47 pm to
L-R when the problem has been reduced to Math & Division.

So, once the paranthese work is complete, the problem becomes:

48/2*12
24*12
288

This: 2(12) is 2*12
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 3:48 pm
Posted by LSU 318 LSU
El Cerrito Place
Member since Jan 2011
4278 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:57 pm to
There are 3 levels to PEMDAS.

Level 1 = Parentheses and Exponents
Level 2 = Multiply and Divide
Level 3 = Add and Subtract

If they are on the same level, you then go from left to right and work out which ever comes first

48/2(9+3)
48/2(12)
24(12)
288
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 3:58 pm
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
9322 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:59 pm to
I got it wrong initially because my mind turned (9+3) into (9x3) for some annoying fricking reason.






If this was a gif that switched the + to x randomly and very quickly after a few seconds this would be a great troll.
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
68529 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 4:05 pm to
Nope that's the right answer
Posted by TigerPox
Member since Oct 2010
33333 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Should have wrote it like this

48
2 (9+3) = 288

or

__48__
2(9+3) = 2

quote:
To me it comes down to how you read the ÷ symbol. Again the ÷ is ambiguous and there's a reason you won't see it past 8th grade.


The above is the correct answer. The debate will continue since the equation was poorly written.
All of this. ALL OF THIS.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram