- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bizarre Math Question and Answer breaks the internet - Sorry if already posted
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:39 pm to terd ferguson
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:39 pm to terd ferguson
Frick this thread
It's 288
It's 288
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:39 pm to stout
288. Is this still being discussed.
Where is my picture that talks about intelligent people always being less sure about what they do than unintelligent people?
Where is my picture that talks about intelligent people always being less sure about what they do than unintelligent people?
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:40 pm to terd ferguson
Plug this in a cell in Excel and tell me what you get:
=48/2*(9+3)
288
=48/2*(9+3)
288
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:40 pm to KosmoCramer
I don't get it, that's easy as shite?
right?
right?
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:41 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:Here you go with the ÷ that seems to give you so much trouble
I'll make you a deal. Show me anywhere in the AISC SCM or ACI 318, or NDS where the ÷ symbol is used, and I will tell you a project around New Orleans that I have worked on. The problem is written terribly, hence 8+ pages of discussion.

Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:42 pm to StinkBait72
quote:Here you go
That giant calculator got an actual division symbol on it or does it only have the "/" Evidently it can make a difference and so can "implied" multiplication.

Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:42 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
NYNolaguy1
what the frick are you talking about
eta. who gives a shite what the symbol looks like, it means the exact same thing
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:44 pm to DanW1
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:50 pm to KosmoCramer
I would think he is using the divide symbol to keep all in one line. That would be cleaner than x/(y(a+b)). People are making a leap they shouldn't unless knowing he meant it that way. If he was doing it that way it is 2. As written it is 288. This should be an example of why math should be written precisely.
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:50 pm to lsupride87
I get how you come up with that number.
48x.5x(9+3)=288
To me it comes down to how you read the ÷ symbol. It's either
(48 ÷2)x(9+3)
Or
48 ÷(2(9+3))
One gives you 288 the other 2.
Again the ÷ is ambiguous and there's a reason you won't see it past 8th grade. Also a reason you'll never find it in any industry wide engineering manual.
48x.5x(9+3)=288
To me it comes down to how you read the ÷ symbol. It's either
(48 ÷2)x(9+3)
Or
48 ÷(2(9+3))
One gives you 288 the other 2.
Again the ÷ is ambiguous and there's a reason you won't see it past 8th grade. Also a reason you'll never find it in any industry wide engineering manual.
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:51 pm to KosmoCramer
The dress is white and gold.
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:53 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:Both of these are you changing the equation. Read it as it is 48 ÷ 2(9+3). It is simple
(48 ÷2)x(9+3)
Or
48 ÷(2(9+3))
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:54 pm to DanW1
quote:
48÷2(9+3) simplifies to 48÷2×12.
48÷2×12 is the exact same as (48/1)x(1/2)x(12/1)
Which is 48x.5x12.
You just changed my mind.
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:56 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Both of these are you changing the equation
(48 / 2) x (9 + 3)
That's the same as 48 / 2 x (9 + 3).
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:56 pm to Duke
quote:It gives the same answer but it is still you changing the written equation by adding parenthesis
(48 / 2) x (9 + 3)
That's the same as 48 / 2 x (9 + 3)
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:00 pm to GRTiger
quote:
For those who say the answer is 2
I say it's 288
quote:
what is the answer to this one:
5-2+3
6
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:03 pm to lsupride87
quote:
It gives the same answer but it is still you changing the written equation by adding parenthesis
It's a redundant parenthesis to clarify the difference in how people read it. The parenthesis doesn't alter the problem in the slightest.
This thread is why textbooks write any equations with division in them as fractions.
Posted on 4/15/15 at 3:03 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
But are you entering "/" instead of a division sign? That's the only reason for any debate.
Well, you're arguing the wrong side of that. Using ÷, the answer should be 288. PEMDAS doesn't discriminate, and MD are equal.
However, if / then its
48
____
2(9+3)
That's 2 since everything in the denominator should be worked first.
Popular
Back to top


0








