Started By
Message

re: Billionaire investor says government should have helped consumers instead of companies

Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:01 am to
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42797 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:01 am to
I don’t want to reduce it to an either or. I’m arguing that advancing technology will always make physical/menial labor more efficient and therefore less valuable monetarily. That’s why you see the upper class wealth continue to grow, GDP continue to grow, productivity continue to grow, and middle class wages stagnate or decrease.

Then at the same time you get welfare being implemented and now it’s almost not economically worthwhile to work an entry level job/menial labor job when you can make almost as much or even more if you are in welfare.

They are completely intertwined.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:02 am to
quote:

quote:


So it’s the growth of the welfare state that has most caused this and not trickle down economics?


.....

No?

That whole sentence was talking about a whole separate issue. “Meanwhile” being the key word.

Taxes you have to pay doesn’t depress your wages, just your take home. I was saying combined with the middle class getting a lower portion of US economic production (which was what the graph shows), they get hit by an additional punch of higher taxes and exclusion to supportive programs.

I love how you want to reduce something as complex as this topic as an either/or situation.


And my point is that those on the lower edge of that ladder, start losing their incentive to stay out of the welfare state - which as you move forward will grow with the next rung, and the next rung who would happily work under a normal scenario, but due to these factors see less and less benefit for that work.

I think trickle down and how a lot of these gdp / productivity increases aren't being passed down in adequate percentages thus helps grow the welfare state.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53625 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Over the past decade, the average American middle class household has increased its net worth substantially.




I get that the graph excludes the Trump surge.

But at best you are looking at a flat growth compared to your pre recession peak.

Unless you just want to be intellectually dishonest and ignore the 40% loss and call the decade long recovery “substantial growth”
This post was edited on 7/9/20 at 8:07 am
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42797 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:06 am to
Your graph shows a 72% increase in median wealth of families until the housing market bubble (dramatically inflated by government mandated and backed housing loans to low income families) popped.

Now the entire 90’s could be said to be fake because of the housing bubble but still, there would have been some growth, maybe just not as much
Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6795 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Now the entire 90’s could be said to be fake because of the housing bubble
Dot com bubble
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42797 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:09 am to
That too.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53625 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:11 am to
quote:


I don’t want to reduce it to an either or. I’m arguing that advancing technology will always make physical/menial labor more efficient and therefore less valuable monetarily. That’s why you see the upper class wealth continue to grow, GDP continue to grow, productivity continue to grow, and middle class wages stagnate or decrease.


You are talking about the lower class. Which wasn’t the issue. I even said once you normalize for inflation, a flat proportion for them is expected.

The bulk of middle class is white collar however, and therefore excempt from the allusions you are making. How much do you think the coders for Amazon’s front end infrastructure are making?

Hint: it’s not 100s of thousands.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:14 am to
quote:

How much do you think the coders for Amazon’s front end infrastructure are making?


How much do you think they should be making?
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160203 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:16 am to
I know this site hates Mark Cuban now, but the idea he said he suggested to the re-opening the country task force was to give all Americans $X on some sort of prepaid card and then have them spend it in a certain time frame or else they forfeit the money. He felt it would be a better direct injection into the economy.


Not sure if it would have worked better, but it at least seems this thought is out there.
Posted by Supermoto Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2010
10980 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:16 am to
quote:

this top-down idea that trickle-down economics work," Palihapitiya said. "It doesn't work anymore."

So trickle-down economics worked in the past. All of a sudden, he says it doesn't work now.
quote:

Fed has pumped liquidity into the financial system to shore up lending. "It makes it very hard to be anything except long the market," Palihapitiya said.


quote:

"Would I love to be isolating certain things that I think are not set up for success, or trying to buy cheap things? Sure, but it's not possible right now," he continued.

And now he exposes his agenda. Trickle-down doesn't help this guy in evaluating companies to buy cheap and he is pissed. OK. you poor bastard. I get it now.
Posted by Vestigial Morgan
Member since Apr 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Didn't get NEAR as much as the companies so get outta here with that shite


I don't understand this. Companies got money ...that curtailed layoffs ( couldn't be used for bonuses or buybacks) so...people may not have gotten a govt check or as much as companies but..still got their work checks
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
32437 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:21 am to
quote:

100% of our PPP loan went to payroll and group health insurance.


I don't know how anecdotal this is, but I only know of two business owners that are close enough to me to talk honestly about this and both said that thanks to the PPP, the only had to lay off <20% of their staff instead of 80%. Both of these are fairly good sized companies too. So, at least in those cases, it went were it was supposed to go.

The thread yesterday had people bragging about pocketing the money even though revenues were up and bonuses were gonna be big. That was pretty shitty to read, at least I thought so.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
23422 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:23 am to
quote:

"It makes it very hard to be anything except long the market,"


quote:

And now he exposes his agenda. Trickle-down doesn't help this guy in evaluating companies to buy cheap and he is pissed. OK. you poor bastard.


I noticed this too. Heaven forbid it helped the prospects of long players in the market, you know, average people, more than it created enough disruption for rich people to get richer.
Posted by reb13
Member since May 2010
10905 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:27 am to
He’s just pissed be can’t pick up stakes in businesses on the cheap.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
23422 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:38 am to
quote:

I know this site hates Mark Cuban now, but the idea he said he suggested to the re-opening the country task force was to give all Americans $X on some sort of prepaid card and then have them spend it in a certain time frame or else they forfeit the money. He felt it would be a better direct injection into the economy.


Not sure if it would have worked better, but it at least seems this thought is out there.


And what stores/businesses would be open during this time frame?

Again, in this scenario we are only really helping the consumer goods industries, which faired well. These guys that don’t seem to believe in trickledown economics seem to think that concentrating capital in certain industries will somehow boost the entire economy.

Meanwhile, local restaurants and bars are still having issues reopening due to restrictions. The only way to save them is to let them open and see what the market does, or give them capital directly to tread water.

Cash flow is what makes the world go round. We need cash to move to grow the economy, so freezing access to certain markets will be the biggest barrier to economic growth and tax base.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
33923 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:50 am to
Chamath has some great takes on things. He’s an advocate for the average person despite being a billionaire. Really smart guy, and seems like he genuinely cares for the American public
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42797 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 8:57 am to
His entire rant is based on the fact that he couldn’t use his billions to buy undervalued stocks more efficiently. He doesn’t give a shite about the average American.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:03 am to
I agree about those that didn't use the funds properly.

We haven't laid anyone off yet and everyone is at 100% pay. However, we are starting to dig into funds that I really would rather use for things ike developing and growing the business. Our business is still way down.

The good news is that we are starting to get more and more projects to look at and bid. It needs to turn into real work and revenue soon or some difficult decisions will have to be made.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:13 am to
quote:

The fact is the fruits of the booms of the US economy doesn’t go to the middle class backbone anymore like it did.

This isn’t really an opinion or up for interpretation.


Don't sweat it, they don't know any better. They aren't educated in economics. They've been entertained by pseudo-intellectuals who depend upon their imbecility to garner votes in order to keep the 'game' running the way it has for the last 40 years. Getting a large group of people to vote against their own best-interest in an open democracy is quite a feat.

What's REALLY funny is when every thread on this place about taxpayer money being misspent is filled with rants about welfare queens, dindu's, etc., without a sentence spent on the fact that our tax money is basically being funneled directly to rich people and corporations who themselves pay little in taxes...AKA, the REAL socialist aspect of this country.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112949 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:34 am to
quote:

it is truly mind boggling how anyone can be a ‘fan’ of any politician at this point.
The average person's worship of politicians is why we're in this shitty 2 party mess we're in now.

Politicians should be bending the knee to us, but we do it the other way around.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram