Started By
Message

re: Beautiful Tennessee girl killed by dogs

Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:38 pm to
Posted by whit
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
11073 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:38 pm to
Jesus that’s terrible.
Posted by Hogwarts
Arkansas, USA
Member since Sep 2015
18379 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:39 pm to
On bull mastiffs, several years ago in my area a lady was out jogging and a mastiff attacked her and tore her face almost off and killed her. Fast forward to two years later in the same area and a different mastiff mauled and killed a 4 year old kid. The kicker is the dogs were brother and sister from the same litter. Completely unreal
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
10043 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Does your chart control for how the dog is raised and handled?


It does not, among many other very important factors.

It's simply statistics without context. It doesn't matter, most people have their mind made up because they don't give a frick about dogs one bit. Dogs are lower than them. It's much easier to look at a chart like that, refer to Occam's Razor, and leave it alone.
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
10043 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

That’s not how this works. Pit bulls aren’t overwhelming the most dogs owned in the US like white people are in the population.


Exactly. That's NOT how this works. If you can't understand why that chart proves nothing, I can't help you.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
60676 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:45 pm to
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46024 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:45 pm to
I mean I think Pitbulls are trash dogs with few redeeming qualities. But I expect statistics pointing out how awful they are to have at least a shred of credibility. Which I've yet to see.
Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
7623 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

That proves absolutely nothing.


It proves Pit Bulls account for the VAST majority of fatalities. Are you going to argue the sun doesn't set in the West too?

quote:

That's like saying white people are the most dangerous people because they commit the most crimes.


So pit bulls make up the majority of dog breeds in the country?

quote:

I know you don't have the intellect to grasp the difference between a peer-reviewed study


LOL. I think I could handle it. Please provide a link.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30763 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

mastiff, rottweiler-lab mix, two mastiff-lab mixes and a pitbull


yeah, nothing possible could go wrong with this group of dogs.

Every breed but the lab is on the top10 of dangerous breeds.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30499 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

You're the one making claims, find some evidence that says pit bulls are inherently more dangerous than any other dog breed. Not that bullshite about pit bulls biting people the most, I mean real peer-reviewed studies that show differences in the brains of different breeds of dogs.


Ask an insurance actuary and before you scream bias all they care about is money. If you require a peer-reviewed study to make all your life decisions you must live a paralyzed life.

Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46024 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

It proves Pit Bulls account for the VAST majority of fatalities.


I'd like some context. Are you ever going to provide it?
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30763 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:51 pm to
From 2018, human fatalities by dog breed

Posted by Hogwarts
Arkansas, USA
Member since Sep 2015
18379 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:52 pm to
How dare you use statistics!
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46024 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:53 pm to
Again, no context.

Here I'll paint it in crayon for you:

Bubba the inbred likes pits. Bubba the inbred treats his pits like shite. He treats all of his dogs like shite, but he has a special place in his trailer park for treating pits like shite. So does his extended inbred family.

BLAMO! Pitts suddenly are teh debil!!!
This post was edited on 9/5/19 at 5:55 pm
Posted by OldmanBeasley
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2014
11173 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:53 pm to
You are aware these dogs were originally bred to fight, hunt and do other similar things right?
This post was edited on 9/5/19 at 5:54 pm
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
10043 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

Ask an insurance actuary and before you scream bias all they care about is money. If you require a peer-reviewed study to make all your life decisions you must live a paralyzed life.


Insurance actuaries work based off statistics. If people in Louisiana get in more car crashes than people in Washington, rates are going to be higher and they're going to be less likely to be insured. Does that mean that people born in Louisiana are inherently worse drivers than people in Washington?

I understand your argument here, but it's just flawed. Actuaries make statistical analysis based off what has happened in the real world without any context as to why it's happened.

quote:

LOL. I think I could handle it. Please provide a link.


Provide a link? A link to what? I'm telling you that you're not smart enough to understand why that chart doesn't prove anything. You can't even keep up with our argument.

Also that's not how this works. Yall are in here claiming that pitbulls are dangerous, yall provide the proof. You link to me to a credible study that points to some gene that makes pitbulls more dangerous, I will gladly rethink my position. Until then this thread is full of nothing but people spouting unsubstantiated claims.
This post was edited on 9/5/19 at 5:57 pm
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46024 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

You are aware these dogs were originally bred to fight, hunt and do other similar things right?



Because no other breeds were bred for the same thing.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
29727 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Give me some evidence


It has been posted on here several times that pits are responsible for more deaths than ALL OTHER BREEDS COMBINED.

That doesn't mean that all pits are dangerous. What it means is they are more prone to killing people than all other breeds.

The big problem is you can't tell which pit is gonna go postal until there's a body in the yard.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
10609 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

The owner of the dogs lived in an adjacent property to where O’Shea was visiting and they were reportedly kept on the property by an electric fence.


Electric fence was needed to keep them in or area bad enough to need and electric fence plus 5 attack dogs willing & able to kill?

Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143817 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

You link to me to a credible study that points to some gene that makes pitbulls more dangerous, I will gladly rethink my position.


You’ve been linked a body count.
Posted by OldmanBeasley
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2014
11173 posts
Posted on 9/5/19 at 6:00 pm to
I didn’t say other breeds weren’t, but if I’m looking for a dog as a family pet I’m not going to go with one that was designed to hunt and kill.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram