- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Baton Rouge- Only a handful of properties will be bought out to widen I-10
Posted on 8/28/18 at 11:50 am to terriblegreen
Posted on 8/28/18 at 11:50 am to terriblegreen
Westbound has a lot less issues than eastbound when it comes to the bridge. It clogs up because mouth-breathing dipshits like yourself get in wrecks or their car breaks down and/or catches on fire.
Posted on 8/28/18 at 12:18 pm to Crow Pie
Pretty much and a handful of politicians
Posted on 8/28/18 at 12:24 pm to terriblegreen
Actually the bridge isn't the choke point heading East.
Posted on 8/28/18 at 12:29 pm to terriblegreen
Bridge is three lanes each way.
At down ramp it narrows to two lanes going West and one going East.
At that point 110 connects to 10 exacerbating the problem.
Widening 10 helps ease traffic headed to Downtown from the East. Widening 10 helps get people heading East off the bridge and it helps people leaving Downtown.
Is it the magic bullet? No, but it's an important factor.
At down ramp it narrows to two lanes going West and one going East.
At that point 110 connects to 10 exacerbating the problem.
Widening 10 helps ease traffic headed to Downtown from the East. Widening 10 helps get people heading East off the bridge and it helps people leaving Downtown.
Is it the magic bullet? No, but it's an important factor.
This post was edited on 8/28/18 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 8/28/18 at 12:37 pm to member12
quote:
Maybe even a sound tunnel over the overpass area.
Maybe if they pay for it.
They have their businesses there knowing there is a fricking interstate over their heads
Posted on 8/28/18 at 12:59 pm to Cosmo
They were there before they built I 10.
Now folks who live down 12 and who moved there after 12 was built are s different story.
Now folks who live down 12 and who moved there after 12 was built are s different story.
Posted on 8/28/18 at 1:11 pm to Trout Bandit
quote:
Westbound has a lot less issues than eastbound when it comes to the bridge. It clogs up because mouth-breathing dipshits like yourself get in wrecks or their car breaks down and/or catches on fire.
You are retarded if you think West bound has less issues. You are stating opinion for fact. Drive west any day of the week in rush hour and see how that works out for you stupid. You got called out on your stupid statement and now you are acting like a little pussy.
Posted on 8/28/18 at 1:14 pm to Trout Bandit
Furthermore, I realize it’s happening. I just think it’s a band aid on an open wound. If you think there isn’t a far better alternative then you are just being argumentative.
Posted on 8/28/18 at 1:29 pm to terriblegreen
quote:
Furthermore, I realize it’s happening. I just think it’s a band aid on an open wound. If you think there isn’t a far better alternative then you are just being argumentative.
Its just a bandaid, adding lanes will only reduce to some degree the total time traffic is congested in a area, it will not eliminate congestion, that requires adding alternate routes. How do I know this, I took a class in traffic engineering in college.
Posted on 8/28/18 at 2:01 pm to EA6B
quote:
that requires adding alternate routes. How do I know this, I took a class in traffic engineering in college.
Perhaps you'd like to join my crackerjack team on a feasibility study for a BR Loop.
Posted on 8/28/18 at 2:40 pm to terriblegreen
You have a major interstate with one lane East bound, 60 style exit and entrance ramps, no shoulers for emergencies and merging interstates from the north and the east which help form a huge hour glass; you have to fix it when you can.
No, it's not the fix, but it is certainly part of any fix and should have been fine twenty five years ago.
No, it's not the fix, but it is certainly part of any fix and should have been fine twenty five years ago.
Posted on 8/28/18 at 3:45 pm to Martini
quote:
Yeah that’s all it was. Nothing to do with the hundreds of millions in actual construction costs.
The stupidity on this sight is amazing.
True, but not realizing you are the stupidly is the issue.
Do you disagree it would have cost less 20 years ago, moron?
The state [and feds] is now poorer than it's ever been, and you think somehow now its magically feasible ?
Again, shithole Bayon Rouge thinking
This post was edited on 8/28/18 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 8/28/18 at 3:54 pm to TheCaterpillar
Jimmy B already said he was going to build a new bridge, no worries.
Popular
Back to top

2





