- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Astronomy or Geology easier?
Posted on 4/16/17 at 5:32 pm to tigerbait1.6
Posted on 4/16/17 at 5:32 pm to tigerbait1.6
Answers in this thread are interesting. I am godawful at science, but I didn't mind Geology and actually made good grades during the 3 semesters I took it. I think rocks are cool, though.
The life sciences are what kills me.
The life sciences are what kills me.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 5:34 pm to tigerbait1.6
Took the first two Geology courses at LSU to fulfill my science requirement for business majors. Two relatively easy A's. Lots of gross memorization cramming the night before tests, but nothing really difficult. However, we didn't have to take a lab.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 5:36 pm to MMauler
The lab was easy as hell. You just stared at rock samples for 3 hours
Posted on 4/16/17 at 6:51 pm to CoachChappy
Posted on 4/16/17 at 6:52 pm to tigerbait1.6
I took Rocks for Jocks. Wasn't that hard.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 7:07 pm to tigerbait1.6
Geology degree will bring the income


Posted on 4/16/17 at 7:27 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Once you get into astronomy there is tons of math, and astrophysics I would imagine bleeds over into it. I would think that a legit astronomy degree would be very math heavy.
My undergrad major was in Physics and Astronomy and you are absolutely correct. There are plenty of Physics subfields that don't involve Astronomy at all and vice-versa but there's lots of common ground too.
FWIW, geology and planetary astronomy can also overlap.
But the OP sounds like he's just looking for how to deal with an intro class to satisfy a requirement, and neither intro Astro or Geo involves much math. I'd say it mostly depends on the grad student teaching the class - the right instructor can make either one fascinating, the wrong one will be utterly boring.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 7:43 pm to tigerbait1.6
quote:
need to take two consecutive semesters of a sequential science with a lab.
astronomy labs are night classes
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:07 pm to tigerbait1.6
Since your post is nearly a year old, I know it's unlikely that you're still seeking information about this, but I wanted to share my own experience because the amount of math in a course was the deciding factor for me when I had to choose which science courses to take to satisfy the core curriculum requirement for a BA (in history) when I was in college during the 1990s. My college was still on the quarter system then, so the core curriculum was different than what's found under the semester system. I've always been good at arithmetic, but any math beyond that, such as algebra, turns my brain into a jumbled mess. In high school, I passed the classes I had to take, but just by the skin of my teeth. My inability wasn't from a lack of trying. I was typically an A student. My quarterly average for Spanish 104 would've been a 100, had I not lost a half point on my final test, and I had a 97 end-of-quarter average in French. I always made As in history, English, psychology, etc., but in the one math course I took in college during my last quarter, I made a D. I was absolutely okay with it. I mention all of this so you'll understand that this info is from someone who seriously sucks in math. I had to take either 3 science courses (2 in a sequence/all 3 had labs) and 1 math, or 2 science/2 math courses. I went with the former. I took the intro astronomy course (105, I think) which had some math that was above my ability. I couldn't solve the equations, nor could I make heads or tails of Einstein's theory of relativity, but I could memorize everything else, so I made a B for the quarter. I didn't take Astronomy 106 because my professor told me it was heavy on the math and was essentially astrophysics. This might not always be the case for Astronomy 102/106 (or whatever comes after the intro class), but I knew I had to find something else because the math in astronomy is just too complex for this dumb-dumb. I decided to take my 2 course sequence in geology, and I loved it. A young, newly-hired professor, who'd just received his PhD, taught my class. He was excited about teaching, and he made geology interesting. He was even able to teach me how to do whatever math was in GEO 105 & 106. I'm sorry this is a book, but I'm willing to risk writing too much in case my experience can help someone else who doesn't care that they'll never know whether Train B catches up to Train A, or what time Train C will arrive in Chicago. I hope you chose the course that was best for you.
This post was edited on 2/17/18 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:51 pm to tigerbait1.6
There is more to learn about rocks than you could possibly imagine.
I thought it would be so easy. Jesus, Judith Schibout (sp) geology was stupid hard.
Run!
ETA: Holy Bumped with wall of text, Batman!
WTF with this old bump.
I thought it would be so easy. Jesus, Judith Schibout (sp) geology was stupid hard.
Run!
ETA: Holy Bumped with wall of text, Batman!
WTF with this old bump.

This post was edited on 2/17/18 at 6:53 pm
Posted on 2/17/18 at 9:02 pm to tigerbait1.6
First year of astronomy isn't too bad. First year geology is an insomnia cure. This was at LSU over 20 years ago so I don't remember who the instructors were. Geology was in Howe Russell Hall, which to me for some reason was a creepy place.
This post was edited on 2/17/18 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 2/17/18 at 9:04 pm to tigerbait1.6
Entry 1000 level astronomy has little or no math....way more interesting...go with that...
Posted on 2/17/18 at 10:09 pm to tigerbait1.6
Astrology... Scorpios rule!
Geology... rocks for jocks.
Geology... rocks for jocks.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 10:19 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Unless you look forward to memorizing a butt load of rock types and formations, go with astronomy. On the up side, some day in the future you can amaze some girl by naming some star formation. I highly doubt you will get the chance to point out a large buried rock formation to a chick.
I took astronomy and don't remember shite from that class.
I would recommend geology. I have met quite a few geology chicks who were hot and outdoorsy. Plenty of opportunities to point out cool rock formations to a chick while hiking in the great American West.
Plus, if you ended up liking geology, you could get a job in the energy industry and make 10x more cash than something related to astronomy or agronomy.
This post was edited on 2/17/18 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:07 pm to tigerbait1.6
geology is easier but more boring. Geography is the easiest.
Back to top
