- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Article: "Record number of car buyers 'upside down' on trade-ins"
Posted on 11/28/16 at 11:30 am to stout
Posted on 11/28/16 at 11:30 am to stout
quote:
I even got one with 0% financing and it was still pretty stupid considering the depreciation rate on a vehicle.
So get 0-3% financing on a used vehicle instead.
Whether you should pay cash or not is pretty simple - if they'll finance it for 6 years at 2%, the only question you should ask yourself is whether you'd take a 2% return on your money for the next 6 years. If the answer is no, then finance it.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 11:31 am to GetCocky11
I'm pretty sure you can finance beats by dre headphones. Americans are retarded.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 11:37 am to slackster
quote:
So get 0-3% financing on a used vehicle instead.
Whether you should pay cash or not is pretty simple - if they'll finance it for 6 years at 2%, the only question you should ask yourself is whether you'd take a 2% return on your money for the next 6 years. If the answer is no, then finance it.
finally somebody that understands money and investing.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 11:40 am to lsu777
quote:
finally somebody that understands money and investing.
There is the emotional value of having no car note (or mortgage for that matter), so it isn't necessarily cut and dry, but suggesting paying cash for a car is the only solid financial decision is ignorant.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 11:54 am to slackster
quote:
but suggesting paying cash for a car is the only solid financial decision is ignorant.
its not wholly ignorant just incomplete.
There are two decisions that you have to factor...
1) can I afford this vehicle?
2) should I finance the vehicle
people seem to combine the two decisions. And the biggest mistake people think is if they can afford the payment. Well the car dealership will come up with ways to enable you to afford the payment.
i had a friend that financed a used car for 6 years. The car broke down in the middle of it, and he had to finance the repair of it. holy shite is he bad with money.
Anyway, I bought a new car in 2012, and the depreciation on the used cars wasn't that great so we bought new. We will likely buy another car in 2018 and will make a decision then.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:00 pm to lsu777
quote:
ok oh wise one please explain how laying down 10k cash is smarter than borrowing 10k @2% and investing the 10k in cash you were going to use and make 6%? please do
Because literally nobody does this.
That's why. If you're the unicorn, then the advice doesn't apply to you. You can defy gravity, too.
quote:
yea I believe i can build wealth buying cars
quote:
Bottom line is you and most others that say pay cash are wrong for those that can borrow at crazy low rates and understand how to invest wisely.
I cannot lose money on interest I don't pay on money I don't borrow. Min/maxers are free to disagree all day - in theory. In practice, I win on day 1 every single time.
quote:
just like its not smart to pay off a house if you are locked into some of the crazy low rates they are offering now a days.
This is a lit bit different - I would agree with the min/maxers on this one - EXCEPT - min/maxers tend to value housing at $0 - you have to have somewhere to live.
I will say this - if you're going to live above your means, it's better to be house rich/cash poor than to be car rich/cash poor. At least at some point, you might get your money back on the house. You never, ever will on the car.
Never, ever - no matter how hard you try to justify it.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:02 pm to Mir
you get downvoted for this, but I do this and it's sound strategy. I do have a current lease so the mrs can have a new car, but my truck and work vans were bought in cash.
I would rather someone else take the depreciation hit then I buy their car used.
I would rather someone else take the depreciation hit then I buy their car used.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:03 pm to Napoleon
quote:
I do this
quote:
I do have a current lease
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:05 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
ok oh wise one please explain how laying down 10k cash is smarter than borrowing 10k @2% and investing the 10k in cash you were going to use and make 6%? please do
Funny actually, I bought a 2015 Toyota Tundra last November. With my trade in I would have needed an extra $10k to purchase. I decided to finance at 3% and put the $10k into 3 upstream oil companies. Today my $10k looks like $18k less than a year later.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:09 pm to LNCHBOX
I should say she has a lease, but then we got married so we have a lease.
I have three vehicles in my name and no car notes in my name.
I have three vehicles in my name and no car notes in my name.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:10 pm to LSUEEAlum
quote:
Funny actually, I bought a 2015 Toyota Tundra last November. With my trade in I would have needed an extra $10k to purchase. I decided to finance at 3% and put the $10k into 3 upstream oil companies. Today my $10k looks like $18k less than a year later.
How much is your payment and what is your term?
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:14 pm to Ace Midnight
$230 per month for 5 years. Paying it off in 2 years though. Should end up being a little less than $1000 in interest i figured.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:22 pm to LSUEEAlum
quote:
230 per month for 5 years. Paying it off in 2 years though. Should end up being a little less than $1000 in interest i figured.
The problem with the analysis is that it isn't just interest.
You're still paying it off. You're still eating the depreciation. You made money off the $10k you didn't pay in cash.
BUT, at the end of the day, the financing - in almost every case, facilitates buying more car than one can afford AND builds a car note, into your budget, and locks that in for most folks forever. They "miss" that car payment. So, we literally spend millions of dollars (or, it costs us millions of dollars, in opportunity costs, depreciation, interest, transaction, fees, etc.) over 50 or 60 years to end up with a fully depreciated hunk of metal.
That's the problem. And, there is another paradox - the poorer you are, the more sense it makes to finance, assuming you buy an appropriate amount of car. And that amount is going to shock you when you consider how expensive cars are now - give or take about 25% of your annual salary - THAT'S your 'no more than' number when buying a car.
If folks followed that rule, financing wouldn't be the fatal poison that it is. Gross $100k? Buy a $25k car. Those folks don't go to the poor house/Ch. 7.
Gross $70k and buy a $50k truck? I DGAF what your interest rate, that truck is literally going to drive you to bankruptcy court.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:23 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
I cannot lose money on interest I don't pay on money I don't borrow. Min/maxers are free to disagree all day - in theory. In practice, I win on day 1 every single time.
This all depends on the source of the funds. If you're going to pay cash for a car out of funds you have in a savings account, be my guest. If the money was earning 5-6% annually in some other asset, it is another story entirely.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:23 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Gross $70k and buy a $50k truck? I DGAF what your interest rate, that truck is literally going to drive you to bankruptcy court.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:26 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Gross $70k and buy a $50k truck? I DGAF what your interest rate, that truck is literally going to drive you to bankruptcy court.
But the initial argument is that this guy would be better off saving $50k in cash over the next 7 years and then buying the truck in cash. If he's going to buy the truck regardless, financing it at sub-3% now is a perfectly valid option.
You can argue that paying cash for a car prevents you from buying more car than you can afford, which is fine, but if you're going to buy a particular car at a specific price regardless, then paying cash is NOT the better move financially.
This post was edited on 11/28/16 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:29 pm to slackster
quote:
If you're going to pay cash for a car out of funds you have in a savings account, be my guest. If the money was earning 5-6% annually in some other asset, it is another story entirely.
So, you get a car payment. I get clear title to the vehicle. Now, if I buy the assets back that I exchanged for the vehicle (that's what y'all say y'all are doing "investing" the purchase price) then I'm in the same boat at the end of the term, and I get dollar cost averaging on the way.
If I hit financial hardship and cannot afford to buy the assets back, I'm still okay, driving, etc. You hit a financial hardship, you're having to renegotiate, sell other stuff, what have you to make ends meet.
Hell, I can sell if it I overbought, yes take a deprecation and transaction hit, but buy something cheaper and still make it to work. You've got a lot more dancing to do.
Bottom line, if you can pay cash for the vehicle, you ought to. Why? Because that's common sense. If you don't want to drop that much cash at one time on a vehicle, because you can "make more money" with it elsewhere, then you're overbuying on the car.
That's my opinion, of course, but I'm closer to right than folks who think they can build wealth by setting money on fire buying $50k cars. That's the opposite of building wealth.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:44 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
So, you get a car payment. I get clear title to the vehicle. Now, if I buy the assets back that I exchanged for the vehicle (that's what y'all say y'all are doing "investing" the purchase price) then I'm in the same boat at the end of the term, and I get dollar cost averaging on the way.
There are very few times when dollar cost average works out better than lump sum investing, particularly over a 5 year term, for instance.
quote:
If I hit financial hardship and cannot afford to buy the assets back, I'm still okay, driving, etc. You hit a financial hardship, you're having to renegotiate, sell other stuff, what have you to make ends meet.
If you hit financial hardship 6 months into the purchase, would you rather have a $180 note due each month with $8,920 still in your pocket, or have no note and be out $10k? Cash flow is king.
quote:
Bottom line, if you can pay cash for the vehicle, you ought to. Why? Because that's common sense. If you don't want to drop that much cash at one time on a vehicle, because you can "make more money" with it elsewhere, then you're overbuying on the car.
That is two entirely different thoughts. Even if you believe you should only purchase a car that you can afford in cash, you should STILL finance it with current rates. You're arguing that paying cash will keep you out of buying too much car. That has nothing to do with whether or not financing the vehicle is a wise move once you've decided to purchase it.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:46 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Bottom line, if you can pay cash for the vehicle, you ought to. Why? Because that's common sense. If you don't want to drop that much cash at one time on a vehicle, because you can "make more money" with it elsewhere, then you're overbuying on the car.
you are doing this as one decision, as opposed to two.
its
1) can I afford this car? And I agree with you, you should only buy a car that you have cash to pay for
2) should I finance this car? This is determined by incentives and rates.
I got $1000 in cash for financing my last car purchase. I offered to pay cash outright but if I financed, I got $1000 in cash. I financed, and waited three months (min required by contract) and paid off the car.
Popular
Back to top


1







