- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Apollo 8 assembly, NASA is incredible
Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:35 am to DavidTheGnome
Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:35 am to DavidTheGnome
Shuttles external fuel tank falling towards earth:


Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:43 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
but the catastrophes are all that anyone will ever remember)
I don't think thats true for anyone with half a brain.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:47 am to rantfan
quote:Which is why the OT only remembers the catastrophes. Try to remember how fricking stupid the OT is.
quote:
but the catastrophes are all that anyone will ever remember)
I don't think thats true for anyone with half a brain.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:58 am to iglass
quote:
I am currently a NASA contractor. In my position, I have been fortunate enough to travel to every NASA center except for one, and in my capacity, have been able to go with my camera into places most folks cannot go and take pictures.
I'm missing JPL, Glenn, Langley, and Wallops from my list.
Been inside the STS many times. Spent 12 hours in the USL.
Have close to 10K hours on console supporting STS and ISS missions.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 12:01 pm to DavidTheGnome
LOL...yeah I kinda know a little about that.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 12:25 pm to rantfan
quote:
I don't think thats true for anyone with half a brain.
What else happened during the shuttle program? Sure, I know, I'm a space junkie. McCandless' untethered spacewalk, Hubble, fixing Hubble, Glenn, and so forth.
But ask the average American about the shuttle program? Challenger and Columbia - those 2 stories probably combined for more media coverage than the entire rest of the shuttle program AND the Apollo program after 11.
So, I respectfully disagree with your assessment of me as "half-brained" on space topics.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 12:26 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
quote:
Have close to 10K hours on console supporting STS and ISS missions.
Sah-loot!
Despite 9 years at MSFC, I have never been in the HOSC. Not once.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 12:29 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Shuttles external fuel tank falling towards earth:
That's an unusual photo... since most external tanks end up in the Indian Ocean, I can only presume this is over South Africa somewhere. Even so, it is difficult to see any single area on the African continent this well developed from an agricultural standpoint.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 2:44 pm to Oyster
quote:
I was in late elementary school when the Mercury program started. The Space Race years were an incredible time to be alive. Every space mission was cover 24/7 on tv. There was such a feeling of national pride
Oyster, you are so right. Something tells me we are about the same age. Out here on the west coast, we used to have to get up at 5 am to watch the launches. They were an event that the entire country took part in. Great sense of national pride.
The Mercury and Gemini programs also introduced to some of the most incredible news reporting and reporters that this country has ever seen. To me, Frank McGee of NBC was the best news anchor of them all.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 3:25 pm to DavidTheGnome
Another thing that was mind boggling, the computer power on Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo was less that what the average smartphone has today. Yet, they did all that they did.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 3:26 pm to DavidTheGnome
Think about this:
All that was built without really using any computing (or the most basic computing you can think of).
How the shite is that possible??
All that was built without really using any computing (or the most basic computing you can think of).
How the shite is that possible??
Posted on 12/28/16 at 4:43 pm to Emiliooo
quote:
All that was built without really using any computing (or the most basic computing you can think of).
How the shite is that possible??
One has to recall the infrastructure upon which the space program was built - the U.S. had slowly become an industrial juggernaut - we flirted with war during the last year or so of the Great One, and the rest of Europe exhausted itself. When that war opted for a sequel, we were still a people with heavy isolationist instincts - once we committed to effort 100%, we built more planes than we could fly, more ships than we could sail, more tanks than we could crew - and built a bomb that some who worked on it were worried that we would destroy the world with it and we set it off anyway.
So, 15 years after that war, when the President said, "We choose to go to the Moon" - than goddammit we were going to go to the Moon or die trying. Folks back then did their own math and physics, with slide rules and primitive computers to basically check their work and offer some capacity for speed.
Today's kids couldn't get to the Moon because there are no Google Maps directions for it on their smartphones. That's the God's honest truth.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 4:51 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Thread about it, a guy is saying over NE France: LINK
LINK
Trajectory of the fuel tank:
Gotcha. I was thinking that the trajectory was a bit further to the south by the time it had fully crossed the Atlantic.
I should have realized this from one of my Space Launch systems classes where we discussed emergency alternative landing sites for the shuttle if return to KSC was not possible. Wallops Island, Dover AFB, Bangor, Pease AFB, Halifax, Goose Bay, St. Johns.... etc were all potential emergency abort landing sites. Across the pond were Shannon, Keflavik, Portugal, Zaragoza in Spain, one in Greece, and probably several others that I can't recall. Maybe even one in Sweden and I am sure a few RAF bases in the UK.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 4:55 pm to damnedoldtigah
quote:
Another thing that was mind boggling, the computer power on Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo was less that what the average smartphone has today. Yet, they did all that they did.
Facty: the Apollo program used an onboard infrastructure with less computational power than a Commodore 64.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 6:25 pm to roadkill
quote:
He certainly is/was part of the problem - but - here are the presidents since Shuttle was developed - Nixon approved the concept and program - then Carter, Reagan, GHW Bush, Clinton, GW Bush, Obama - none of them had the vision to leverage NASA and plan for the next generation of space exploration - pitiful.
The SLS (space launch system) is being developed right now and it has been for a couple years. It's the successor to the space shuttle, and it's geared more towards long range missions while the space shuttle was just for stuff in Earth orbit. I'm pretty sure the SLS's first test flight is scheduled for 2017 and there are missions planned to go to asteroids and eventually Mars.
The SLS and it's crew capsule Orion are all being built right here in New Orleans at NASA Michoud. I've been on a few tours for work and it's really something to see.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 7:04 pm to damnedoldtigah
quote:
Another thing that was mind boggling, the computer power on Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo was less that what the average smartphone has today. Yet, they did all that they did.
That's an understatement.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 7:28 pm to corneredbeast
I just spent the day with my kids at the Kennedy Space Center. Pisses me off that our country can't put a person in space right now. I'm convinced the private sector will beat NASA back to space and to Mars. NASA sucks right now.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 7:33 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
NASA sucks right now.
One thing they are doing is crowdsourcing some things - they've embraced a computer game called Kerbal Space Program - which centers around a fledging space program on a planet with a race of creatures not unlike the Minions from Despicable Me. They've already studied certain concepts that heretofore have only been done in simulations (like asparagus staging, popular in the game).
It's on Steam and I highly recommend it for any space nuts who are also into gaming.
This post was edited on 12/28/16 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 12/28/16 at 7:45 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
This was from almost 50 years ago.
Meanwhile 90% of the rest of the world was living in mud huts, ruined/destroyed cities or living in a police state.
Here? We were murica frick yeah living an embarrassment of riches and flexing the muscles of the greatest middle class the world would ever come to know.
Popular
Back to top



1







