Started By
Message

re: Apollo 8 assembly, NASA is incredible

Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:35 am to
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31591 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:35 am to
Shuttles external fuel tank falling towards earth:

Posted by rantfan
new iberia la
Member since Nov 2012
14110 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:43 am to
quote:

but the catastrophes are all that anyone will ever remember)

I don't think thats true for anyone with half a brain.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:47 am to
quote:

quote:
but the catastrophes are all that anyone will ever remember)


I don't think thats true for anyone with half a brain.
Which is why the OT only remembers the catastrophes. Try to remember how fricking stupid the OT is.
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
8252 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 11:58 am to
quote:

I am currently a NASA contractor. In my position, I have been fortunate enough to travel to every NASA center except for one, and in my capacity, have been able to go with my camera into places most folks cannot go and take pictures.



I'm missing JPL, Glenn, Langley, and Wallops from my list.
Been inside the STS many times. Spent 12 hours in the USL.
Have close to 10K hours on console supporting STS and ISS missions.
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
8252 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 12:01 pm to
LOL...yeah I kinda know a little about that.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96236 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

I don't think thats true for anyone with half a brain.


What else happened during the shuttle program? Sure, I know, I'm a space junkie. McCandless' untethered spacewalk, Hubble, fixing Hubble, Glenn, and so forth.

But ask the average American about the shuttle program? Challenger and Columbia - those 2 stories probably combined for more media coverage than the entire rest of the shuttle program AND the Apollo program after 11.

So, I respectfully disagree with your assessment of me as "half-brained" on space topics.
Posted by iglass
North Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
3171 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Have close to 10K hours on console supporting STS and ISS missions.


Sah-loot!

Despite 9 years at MSFC, I have never been in the HOSC. Not once.
Posted by iglass
North Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
3171 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Shuttles external fuel tank falling towards earth:


That's an unusual photo... since most external tanks end up in the Indian Ocean, I can only presume this is over South Africa somewhere. Even so, it is difficult to see any single area on the African continent this well developed from an agricultural standpoint.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31591 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 1:22 pm to
Thread about it, a guy is saying over NE France: LINK

LINK


Trajectory of the fuel tank:

This post was edited on 12/28/16 at 1:24 pm
Posted by Cali-to-Death Valley
SF Bay Area
Member since Dec 2004
799 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

I was in late elementary school when the Mercury program started. The Space Race years were an incredible time to be alive. Every space mission was cover 24/7 on tv. There was such a feeling of national pride


Oyster, you are so right. Something tells me we are about the same age. Out here on the west coast, we used to have to get up at 5 am to watch the launches. They were an event that the entire country took part in. Great sense of national pride.

The Mercury and Gemini programs also introduced to some of the most incredible news reporting and reporters that this country has ever seen. To me, Frank McGee of NBC was the best news anchor of them all.
Posted by damnedoldtigah
Middle of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2014
4275 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 3:25 pm to
Another thing that was mind boggling, the computer power on Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo was less that what the average smartphone has today. Yet, they did all that they did.
Posted by Emiliooo
Member since Jun 2013
5148 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 3:26 pm to
Think about this:

All that was built without really using any computing (or the most basic computing you can think of).

How the shite is that possible??
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96236 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

All that was built without really using any computing (or the most basic computing you can think of).

How the shite is that possible??


One has to recall the infrastructure upon which the space program was built - the U.S. had slowly become an industrial juggernaut - we flirted with war during the last year or so of the Great One, and the rest of Europe exhausted itself. When that war opted for a sequel, we were still a people with heavy isolationist instincts - once we committed to effort 100%, we built more planes than we could fly, more ships than we could sail, more tanks than we could crew - and built a bomb that some who worked on it were worried that we would destroy the world with it and we set it off anyway.

So, 15 years after that war, when the President said, "We choose to go to the Moon" - than goddammit we were going to go to the Moon or die trying. Folks back then did their own math and physics, with slide rules and primitive computers to basically check their work and offer some capacity for speed.

Today's kids couldn't get to the Moon because there are no Google Maps directions for it on their smartphones. That's the God's honest truth.
Posted by iglass
North Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
3171 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Thread about it, a guy is saying over NE France: LINK

LINK


Trajectory of the fuel tank:


Gotcha. I was thinking that the trajectory was a bit further to the south by the time it had fully crossed the Atlantic.

I should have realized this from one of my Space Launch systems classes where we discussed emergency alternative landing sites for the shuttle if return to KSC was not possible. Wallops Island, Dover AFB, Bangor, Pease AFB, Halifax, Goose Bay, St. Johns.... etc were all potential emergency abort landing sites. Across the pond were Shannon, Keflavik, Portugal, Zaragoza in Spain, one in Greece, and probably several others that I can't recall. Maybe even one in Sweden and I am sure a few RAF bases in the UK.
Posted by iglass
North Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
3171 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Another thing that was mind boggling, the computer power on Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo was less that what the average smartphone has today. Yet, they did all that they did.


Facty: the Apollo program used an onboard infrastructure with less computational power than a Commodore 64.
Posted by HammerheadLincoln
The farther west the farther out
Member since May 2015
5807 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 6:25 pm to
quote:


He certainly is/was part of the problem - but - here are the presidents since Shuttle was developed - Nixon approved the concept and program - then Carter, Reagan, GHW Bush, Clinton, GW Bush, Obama - none of them had the vision to leverage NASA and plan for the next generation of space exploration - pitiful.


The SLS (space launch system) is being developed right now and it has been for a couple years. It's the successor to the space shuttle, and it's geared more towards long range missions while the space shuttle was just for stuff in Earth orbit. I'm pretty sure the SLS's first test flight is scheduled for 2017 and there are missions planned to go to asteroids and eventually Mars.

The SLS and it's crew capsule Orion are all being built right here in New Orleans at NASA Michoud. I've been on a few tours for work and it's really something to see.
Posted by corneredbeast
02134
Member since Sep 2008
2302 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Another thing that was mind boggling, the computer power on Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo was less that what the average smartphone has today. Yet, they did all that they did.



That's an understatement.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 7:28 pm to
I just spent the day with my kids at the Kennedy Space Center. Pisses me off that our country can't put a person in space right now. I'm convinced the private sector will beat NASA back to space and to Mars. NASA sucks right now.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96236 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

NASA sucks right now.


One thing they are doing is crowdsourcing some things - they've embraced a computer game called Kerbal Space Program - which centers around a fledging space program on a planet with a race of creatures not unlike the Minions from Despicable Me. They've already studied certain concepts that heretofore have only been done in simulations (like asparagus staging, popular in the game).

It's on Steam and I highly recommend it for any space nuts who are also into gaming.
This post was edited on 12/28/16 at 7:34 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/28/16 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

This was from almost 50 years ago.


Meanwhile 90% of the rest of the world was living in mud huts, ruined/destroyed cities or living in a police state.

Here? We were murica frick yeah living an embarrassment of riches and flexing the muscles of the greatest middle class the world would ever come to know.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram