- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AP Admits Alex Jones Trial Was Just For ‘Show’ And Will Soon Be Thrown Out
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:02 am to TigerDoc
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:02 am to TigerDoc
I mean, I was pretty scared that my elevated PAI-1 would put me at high risk with the vax and was told by people on this board who claim to be part of the medical community that I was being hyper-vigilant multiple times. Turns out, I was correct and multiple doctors who have actually looked at my charts have since said I should absolutely not get the vax.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:03 am to nitwit
quote:
That paragon of journalistic integrity "Envolve" prints an article with no by-line, citing an unidentified AP article reporting what one of Jones' lawyers says, and you post "AP admits Alex Jones trial was just for "show"...?
Really?
There's also basic common sense, but that appears to elude you.
If Tigerdoc was to say "your parents dont' love you", do you have a right to sue him for $1000 for emotional distress?
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:06 am to Sheep
quote:
I never thought "lawyer for guy who lost case says he'll appeal" rises to the level of BREAKING NEWS - but here we are.
This is how internet shitmills work - publish prop, know that pilled boomers like Gumbo are going to come along and pass it along to their pals and normies. Clicks and lulz.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:06 am to BugAC
Say what you want about its legal accuracy, the script here is a compelling one and the effects were spot on. The cast was largely unknown going in, but have mostly acquitted themselves well.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:09 am to GumboPot
We either have freedom of speech in this country, or we do not. Yes Alex Jones is a POS for saying what he did, but that doesn’t make it legally actionable.
He did not yell fire in a crowded theatre.
He did not yell fire in a crowded theatre.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:13 am to GumboPot
So hurt feelings do not pay after all. Good to know.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:15 am to GumboPot
quote:irony thicc
Alex Jones Trial Was Just For ‘Show’
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:16 am to GumboPot
In 2023, the process is the punishment.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:17 am to Warfox
quote:Defamation claims predate the Constitution, and the First Amendment has never protected defamatory speech.
We either have freedom of speech in this country, or we do not. Yes Alex Jones is a POS for saying what he did, but that doesn’t make it legally actionable.
He did not yell fire in a crowded theatre.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:25 am to GumboPot
Must be reversed due to the chilling effect on free speech.
Journalists lives matter!!!
Journalists lives matter!!!
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:33 am to BugAC
quote:
It was stupidity at it's finest, and no matter how "harmful" words may appear, they are just words and are not subject to legal recourse
Except defamation is literally a legal recourse that allows you to sue someone for the harm their lies cause
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:33 am to Salviati
quote:
We either have freedom of speech in this country, or we do not. Yes Alex Jones is a POS for saying what he did, but that doesn’t make it legally actionable. He did not yell fire in a crowded theatre.
Defamation claims predate the Constitution, and the First Amendment has never protected defamatory speech.
There is what EXACTLY defamatory about it?
What’s DAMAGES specifically did he cause?
It’s Bullshite. Guys an a-hole, but the case is complete bullshite.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:39 am to 3nOut
quote:
He can be a piece of shite (he is for this particular instance) and you can still see the absolute insanity of the size of the ruling.
This is a valid point.
When you compare it to Purdue did it puts a little perspective.
This brings up a question. Why did nothing happen to the people who worked for the FDA who was able to get Oxy labeled as non addictive in exchange for better jobs at Purdue? There actions allowed Purdue to do what they did.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:41 am to Sheep
quote:
I never thought "lawyer for guy who lost case says he'll appeal" rises to the level of BREAKING NEWS - but here we are.
Op should be embarrassed. Not even sure msnbc would stoop to this level.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:59 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Gumbo's standards are pretty low.
Say's the guy who still believes NYTs and WaPo MUH Russia Hoax.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:01 am to TigerDoc
quote:
This is how Legacy Media internet shitmills work - publish prop, know that Bluanons like TigerDoc are going to come along and pass it along to their news outlets and normies. Views clicks and outrage.
See how that works.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:02 am to GumboPot
Don't reply to my posts, Gumbo. You might catch the vax!
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:06 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Don't reply to my posts, Gumbo. You might catch the vax!
You always attack the messenger. And it was very notable cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough reading a study that I posted. If you want to attack anyone attack the study.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:08 am to GumboPot
A cardiologist who had his board certification revoked because he was trying to pill people with lies, Gumboman.
This post was edited on 12/13/22 at 11:09 am
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:09 am to OweO
quote:
This brings up a question. Why did nothing happen to the people who worked for the FDA who was able to get Oxy labeled as non addictive in exchange for better jobs at Purdue? There actions allowed Purdue to do what they did.
Welcome to red pill land.
When people talk about deep state, they’re not just being Q Anon nut jobs. This is the sort of thing most are railing against.
Popular
Back to top



0






