- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anthropologists, at what point do you believe we became sentient?
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:33 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:33 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Fun Bunch
Ahhh, our resident atheist coming in to stir things up. You're in every one of these threads. Judging by the atheists I have known throughout life, you're probably an antisocial, weird, goofy looking loser. Judging by your post count, I'm probably right on the antisocial part. Anesthetist make up a fringe sector of society and are pretty vocal on the internet, hence the antisocial part.. Get a life bro. I wasn't going to say thing until I saw your teacher comment.
I'm not even THAT religious, but I cannot STAND people like you.
Loser...
This post was edited on 5/11/20 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:37 pm to lsut2005
quote:
Your resident atheist coming in to stir things up
I'm an atheist? What? Ha. I'd say I'm borderline agnostic at this point in my life but I went to 13 years of Catholic school and go to church with my parents on occasion because it makes them happy. I enjoy parts of the faith and hold no ill will. I just do not necessarily believe in any of it.
quote:
Judging by the atheists I have known throughout life, you're probably an antisocial, weird, goofy looking loser.
K. Nothing could be further from the truth but ok guy.
quote:
I wasn't going to say thing until I saw your teacher comment.
People who do not understand very basic science or outright deny it shouldn't be teaching youths. (I will concede that if someone is teaching history and doesn't let their personal convictions interrupt their teaching, I'm sure that's fine. If the curriculum calls for them to teach Charles Darwin in history, they should not interject their personal philosophies)
I'm sorry this offends you.
All very Christian comments though!
This post was edited on 5/11/20 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:37 pm to bayoubengals88
quote:
Then there's no way that you can prove I'm wrong.
I'm fully aware that it is impossible to prove your position wrong.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:39 pm to lsut2005
quote:Yikes.
Ahhh, our resident atheist coming in to stir things up. You're in every one of these threads.
While his "read a science book" suggestion was a rhetorical marvel (I'm still recovering) I was hoping to maybe read at least a quote or two.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:41 pm to bayoubengals88
I do enjoy the evolution threads. No lie.
Its a personally favorite topic of mine.
I am not atheist, but I also don't consider someone being atheist as a bad thing. Everyone's personal philosophy is their own business.
Its a personally favorite topic of mine.
I am not atheist, but I also don't consider someone being atheist as a bad thing. Everyone's personal philosophy is their own business.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:43 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
K. Nothing could be further from the truth but ok guy.
Good for you! Maybe you’re an exception lol.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:44 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:What do you do for a living?
Fun Bunch
quote:What you don't understand is that one is either a Christian theist or an atheist, but again, I don't expect anyone to believe that, though it is true.
I'm an atheist? What? Ha. I'd say I'm borderline agnostic at this point in my life but I went to 13 years of Catholic school and go to church with my parents on occasion because it makes them happy. I enjoy parts of the faith and hold no ill will. I just do not necessarily believe in any of it.
quote:I teach history. I've got two degrees in history. Not social studies, not education. History. I've written over a thousand pages of history. Am I not qualified to teach history because I don't have a background in science?
People who do not understand very basic science or outright deny it shouldn't be teaching youths.
I'm sorry this offends you.
I'm really concerned about your ability to reason.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:45 pm to lsut2005
You do realize that it is highly highly likely that you know many many atheists and agnostics of all backgrounds that just don't share it with you, right?
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:45 pm to bayoubengals88
quote:
I teach history. I've got two degrees in history. Not social studies, not education. History. I've written over a thousand pages of history. Am I not qualified to teach history because I don't have a background in science?
I clarified, its fine, as long as your personal biases affect your curriculum as little as possible.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:46 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:The only person who can say this is a person who believes there's no truth.
Everyone's personal philosophy is their own business.
And a person who believes there is no truth should not be promoting anything at all. Because, uh, there's no reason to believe what they're saying is, uh.. true.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:49 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:This statement is remarkably naive. Never in the history of the world has one held a neutral position on anything at all. Neutrality is illogical.
I clarified, its fine, as long as your personal biases affect your curriculum as little as possible.
I also hate it when we are told to shove Christianity into the background of European history when it was European history for 1,300 years.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:49 pm to Fun Bunch
Statistically speaking, atheists they make up around 2-3% of the US population.. so probably not.
When did I refer to agnostics? Never said that. I know plenty of them and I can totally respect where they're coming from.
Atheism is a totally different ballgame. As I said earlier, atheists are one extreme end of the spectrum. I feel the same way about crazy religious cults, etc..
When did I refer to agnostics? Never said that. I know plenty of them and I can totally respect where they're coming from.
Atheism is a totally different ballgame. As I said earlier, atheists are one extreme end of the spectrum. I feel the same way about crazy religious cults, etc..
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:50 pm to bayoubengals88
quote:
The only person who can say this is a person who believes there's no truth.
Are you saying that everyone else's personal philosophy is your business?
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:50 pm to Salmon
quote:Then perhaps you should consider Pascal's wager.
I'm fully aware that it is impossible to prove your position wrong.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:52 pm to lsut2005
quote:
Statistically speaking, atheists they make up around 2-3% of the US population.. so probably not.
Its unlikely this is accurate for a variety of reasons.
But unless you live in a really small town, it is likely true.
You weirdos have some strange thoughts on what it actually entails to be an atheist or agnostic.
There's a difference between online and actual reality.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:52 pm to Fun Bunch
Only point I'm trying to get across in this thread is that you can fully blend science with a "creator."
I'm fully aware of the differences between atheists and agnostics, literally just stated that above.
All I'm saying. I do apologize for the a-hole comments, I was a bit riled up haha.
I'm fully aware of the differences between atheists and agnostics, literally just stated that above.
All I'm saying. I do apologize for the a-hole comments, I was a bit riled up haha.
This post was edited on 5/11/20 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:52 pm to bayoubengals88
quote:
What you don't understand is that one is either a Christian theist or an atheist, but again, I don't expect anyone to believe that, though it is true.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:52 pm to bayoubengals88
quote:
Then perhaps you should consider Pascal's wager.
Pascal's Wager is the opposite of faith and doesn't save someone's soul in any sense.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:53 pm to bayoubengals88
quote:
Then perhaps you should consider Pascal's wager.
that isn't belief
This post was edited on 5/11/20 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:54 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Here you go again with your postmodern relativism.
Are you saying that everyone else's personal philosophy is your business?
I haven't done this for six pages just for my own good (although it has helped me in my studies). I do things like this so that people might at least get curious about finding out what Christianity actually is rather than what they think it is.
I've yet to meet an atheist (or if you insist on using "agnostic") that has possessed an understanding of Christianity. This includes apostates.
Popular
Back to top


2




