Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Another “misleading” number from our governor - 200,000 tests needed

Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:40 pm
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:40 pm
quote:

.@LouisianaGov says in a meeting with Trump that the feds' commitment to Louisiana of 200,000 tests per month will be "sufficient" to move forward with reopening, likely May 16. #lalege #lagov
200,000 tests per month equals about 6,700 tests per day. According to the daily data, we can already handle that capacity. 112,000 tests were given in April with a daily max of 10,300 on 4/14 which was over two weeks ago. Why do we need more if the numbers show they’re not necessary as of today?

This post was edited on 4/29/20 at 5:47 pm
Posted by dandyjohn
Member since Apr 2009
804 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:41 pm to
i can't wait till you dudes have something better to do.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:42 pm to
You mean like go back to work? Agreed.





Fwiw, I’m an essential worker. Your post just sucks.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

I can't wait till you dudes have something better to do.


You have 64 posts in 11 years. Sorry for wasting so much of your time.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59352 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:44 pm to
This is like the dollar store version of Golfers thread
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:45 pm to
Agreed.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

This is like the dollar store version of Golfers thread


Proud to be a Walmart, beb.

This post was edited on 4/29/20 at 5:58 pm
Posted by CoolKat
Member since Apr 2016
464 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 6:25 pm to
Because now, many hospitals are testing patients who are going in for surgical procedures that were delayed - testing the patient before surgery to mitigate risk to staff and providers. There will be an upswing in test volume. Maybe not that number, but a factor more of tests.
I'm not justifying the statement, just answering your question
Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
22268 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 6:58 pm to
You can give 200,000 tests tomorrow and 100,000 can acquire the virus while waiting on test results. Tests don’t mean shite
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12866 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

200,000 tests per month equals about 6,700 tests per day. According to the daily data, we can already handle that capacity. 112,000 tests were given in April with a daily max of 10,300 on 4/14 which was over two weeks ago.

I mean, the fact that we had 10,300 tests on one day does not necessarily mean we have enough kits to do that every day. My understanding is that this is about available kits, not lab capacity. Or am I mistaken?
quote:

Why do we need more if the numbers show they’re not necessary as of today?

This is certainly a legitimate question. I understand why we would want more test kits, generally speaking. I don’t understand why 200,000 is some sort of prerequisite for opening things back up. So if 2% of the population gets tested in May, it’s a no-go, but if 4% get tested we’re all good?
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
5075 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 8:19 pm to
I mean the answer is pretty obvious. More tests = more positives. More positives = longer shutdown & more federal funds.
Posted by ruzil
WNC
Member since Feb 2012
18467 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 8:22 pm to
The testing urgency is to capture as many asymptomatic patients as possible to make the numbers go up to make OMB look foolish for opening up the economy.
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
34629 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:00 pm to
Can anyone go get a test or do you still have to meet a bunch of criteria first still?
Posted by JBM210
Member since Dec 2010
3192 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:04 pm to
You all elected this a-hole. Has spit nothing but misinformation since the beginning. frick him
Posted by DaBeerz
Member since Sep 2004
18310 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:05 pm to
I did 3 today, 2 of them had the flu
This post was edited on 4/29/20 at 11:06 pm
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
56852 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:08 pm to
Is he referencing the “robust testing program” in the White House
guidelines?
Not sure I trust he will do the right thing either way

Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9750 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:31 pm to
When Trump had the virtual meeting with all those CEOs recently about reopening almost every single one cited rampant testing as the #1 achievable short term improvement to our response.

They almost all said that without extremely ramped up testing there would be issues restoring widespread confidence of both workers and consumers as well as preventing more disruptive clusters of cases, especially in factories/bigger workplaces.


Not saying I don't think the rampant testing has a strong potential to end up about like airport security but that's just what all the genius business leaders demanded.

Posted by SuwMwf
Member since Jul 2012
1055 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

Because now, many hospitals are testing patients who are going in for surgical procedures that were delayed - testing the patient before surgery to mitigate risk to staff and providers


My father in law was told to go to a lab for a test before his outpatient heart procedure scheduled for this Friday. When he got there with orders for the test the facility told him he did not qualify as someone who needed a test. He has no symptoms and doesn’t know of an exposure. So no pre op covid test for him. Procedure still on. So far.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram