- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Another “misleading” number from our governor - 200,000 tests needed
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:40 pm
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:40 pm
quote:200,000 tests per month equals about 6,700 tests per day. According to the daily data, we can already handle that capacity. 112,000 tests were given in April with a daily max of 10,300 on 4/14 which was over two weeks ago. Why do we need more if the numbers show they’re not necessary as of today?
.@LouisianaGov says in a meeting with Trump that the feds' commitment to Louisiana of 200,000 tests per month will be "sufficient" to move forward with reopening, likely May 16. #lalege #lagov

This post was edited on 4/29/20 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:41 pm to ell_13
i can't wait till you dudes have something better to do.
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:42 pm to dandyjohn
You mean like go back to work? Agreed.
Fwiw, I’m an essential worker. Your post just sucks.
Fwiw, I’m an essential worker. Your post just sucks.
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:44 pm to dandyjohn
quote:
I can't wait till you dudes have something better to do.
You have 64 posts in 11 years. Sorry for wasting so much of your time.
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:44 pm to ell_13
This is like the dollar store version of Golfers thread
Posted on 4/29/20 at 5:57 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
This is like the dollar store version of Golfers thread
Proud to be a Walmart, beb.

This post was edited on 4/29/20 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 4/29/20 at 6:25 pm to ell_13
Because now, many hospitals are testing patients who are going in for surgical procedures that were delayed - testing the patient before surgery to mitigate risk to staff and providers. There will be an upswing in test volume. Maybe not that number, but a factor more of tests.
I'm not justifying the statement, just answering your question
I'm not justifying the statement, just answering your question
Posted on 4/29/20 at 6:58 pm to ell_13
You can give 200,000 tests tomorrow and 100,000 can acquire the virus while waiting on test results. Tests don’t mean shite
Posted on 4/29/20 at 8:03 pm to ell_13
quote:
200,000 tests per month equals about 6,700 tests per day. According to the daily data, we can already handle that capacity. 112,000 tests were given in April with a daily max of 10,300 on 4/14 which was over two weeks ago.
I mean, the fact that we had 10,300 tests on one day does not necessarily mean we have enough kits to do that every day. My understanding is that this is about available kits, not lab capacity. Or am I mistaken?
quote:
Why do we need more if the numbers show they’re not necessary as of today?
This is certainly a legitimate question. I understand why we would want more test kits, generally speaking. I don’t understand why 200,000 is some sort of prerequisite for opening things back up. So if 2% of the population gets tested in May, it’s a no-go, but if 4% get tested we’re all good?
Posted on 4/29/20 at 8:19 pm to ell_13
I mean the answer is pretty obvious. More tests = more positives. More positives = longer shutdown & more federal funds.
Posted on 4/29/20 at 8:22 pm to ell_13
The testing urgency is to capture as many asymptomatic patients as possible to make the numbers go up to make OMB look foolish for opening up the economy.
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:00 pm to ell_13
Can anyone go get a test or do you still have to meet a bunch of criteria first still?
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:04 pm to bee Rye
You all elected this a-hole. Has spit nothing but misinformation since the beginning. frick him
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:05 pm to ell_13
I did 3 today, 2 of them had the flu
This post was edited on 4/29/20 at 11:06 pm
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:08 pm to ell_13
Is he referencing the “robust testing program” in the White House
guidelines?
Not sure I trust he will do the right thing either way

guidelines?
Not sure I trust he will do the right thing either way

Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:31 pm to ell_13
When Trump had the virtual meeting with all those CEOs recently about reopening almost every single one cited rampant testing as the #1 achievable short term improvement to our response.
They almost all said that without extremely ramped up testing there would be issues restoring widespread confidence of both workers and consumers as well as preventing more disruptive clusters of cases, especially in factories/bigger workplaces.
Not saying I don't think the rampant testing has a strong potential to end up about like airport security but that's just what all the genius business leaders demanded.
They almost all said that without extremely ramped up testing there would be issues restoring widespread confidence of both workers and consumers as well as preventing more disruptive clusters of cases, especially in factories/bigger workplaces.
Not saying I don't think the rampant testing has a strong potential to end up about like airport security but that's just what all the genius business leaders demanded.
Posted on 4/29/20 at 11:40 pm to CoolKat
quote:
Because now, many hospitals are testing patients who are going in for surgical procedures that were delayed - testing the patient before surgery to mitigate risk to staff and providers
My father in law was told to go to a lab for a test before his outpatient heart procedure scheduled for this Friday. When he got there with orders for the test the facility told him he did not qualify as someone who needed a test. He has no symptoms and doesn’t know of an exposure. So no pre op covid test for him. Procedure still on. So far.
Popular
Back to top
11








