Started By
Message

Amite River dredging to begin next year

Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:50 pm
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
11536 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:50 pm
LINK

The last time it was dredged was in the 50s!

It seems like a lot of work will be ongoing ten years after the great flood, these projects make a lot of sense. I guess this can be a thread about floodwater mitigation too.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106770 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 7:02 pm to
Never be ready in time.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60851 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 7:03 pm to
Probably getting it ready for a data center
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
53894 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 7:03 pm to
Hahahahahahaha

Great one Jim
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
178835 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 7:09 pm to
The weir was designed to send water down the Amite River but it failed and 80% of the water goes down the diversion canal instead. The lower Amite River is silted in and stagnant and as shallow as 4 feet while the diversional canal is 30 feet deep. The lower Amite is a mini-old river control structure failure that no one notices. Of course this dredging is only for a tiny stretch from Lake Maurepas to highway 22. The long stretch from highway 22 to the diversional canal isn't funded.. which means good luck.
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
11536 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 7:14 pm to
So it's the first. phase from 22 to Maurepas that's funded for $20 MM.. That should help though right? If any stretch of river is clogged up it needs to be cleared out.

BTW how's the Comite diversion going? I thought I read something positive was moving on that too.
This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 7:15 pm
Posted by coonass27
shreveport
Member since Mar 2008
4139 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 7:46 pm to
What I’m still searching my head over is how is St. John able to build a flood wall across the whole parish just about to block surge from the lake by diverting it elsewhere. I get wanting to protect your area but how do you have the right to just Chanel it up the road. The water has to go somewhere.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
80500 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

The weir was designed to send water down the Amite River but it failed and 80% of the water goes down the diversion canal instead.


Never knew why that was installed. Cool.

How does dredging work on a river that doesn't really flow? Just a long arse hose out into the lake? Or some other low area?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
80500 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

What I’m still searching my head over is how is St. John able to build a flood wall across the whole parish just about to block surge from the lake by diverting it elsewhere. I get wanting to protect your area but how do you have the right to just Chanel it up the road. The water has to go somewhere.


Think it was St Tammany that walled up first and flooded St John.

At this point it might actually be cheaper to have pooled the money and built a wall across the rigolets.
Posted by coonass27
shreveport
Member since Mar 2008
4139 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:03 pm to
I kind of wondered the same and just stop it further east but IDK. Just crazy
Posted by Shimoda
Member since Jul 2026
164 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:04 pm to
Will provide no benefit beyond navigability of that stretch of the river
Posted by Shimoda
Member since Jul 2026
164 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

The weir was designed to send water down the Amite River but it failed and 80% of the water goes down the diversion canal instead.


This is not true, though. That's a huge misconception.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31449 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

This is not true, though. That's a huge misconception.


I am pretty sure one of the original design objectives was proportionate flow splitting the flow unequally.
Posted by Portballs
Member since Jun 2025
724 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:15 pm to
Good.
Amite River Commission finally doing something with that $10 million they got a couple years back, other than drawing fat salaries...
This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 8:16 pm
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
67282 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:53 pm to
I thought all this climate change was just going to effect famine and drought.
Why then would we worry about flood mitigation?
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1868 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

How does dredging work on a river that doesn't really flow? Just a long arse hose out into the lake? Or some other low area?


That’d be my guess, if they’re using a pipeline dredge. Pump to a disposal area on top bank somewhere or out to the lake.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
74332 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 9:54 pm to
Why keep dredging this topic up?
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18953 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Good. Amite River Commission finally doing something with that $10 million they got a couple years back, other than drawing fat salaries...

You need to add a zero to that. The commission itself has no employees other than an advisor and secretary. The rest are appointed by the governor.
Anyway, it’s been 30 years of doing nothing. Glad that Paul Sawyer is getting things done.
Posted by sqerty
AP
Member since May 2022
8741 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:05 pm to
They finished Laurel Ridge so anythings possible, I guess. They were talking about that since before I was born
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
18138 posts
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:08 pm to
It seems like any job like this turns into nothing but a big waste of money and resources.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram