Started By
Message

Amite River - Darlington Reservoir

Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:12 am
Posted by PawnMaster
Down Yonder
Member since Nov 2014
1649 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:12 am
WBRZ
quote:

BATON ROUGE - The US Army Corps of Engineers is considering the construction of a new dam and reservoir along the Amite River to help prevent flooding in heavily populated parts of East Baton Rouge, Livingston and Ascension parishes.

The Corps is looking at the Darlington area as a prospective location for the $2.3 billion project, which would create a flood pool of nearly 20 square miles along the East Feliciana-St. Helena parish line.

There's no prospective timetable on how long the project would take should it be approved. If approved, it would still require funding from Congress.

The Corps will have a 45-day comment period, including public hearings on Dec. 17 at the North Park Recreation Center in Denham Springs and Dec. 18 at the Clinton United Methodist Church in Clinton.






Approximately 113 homes would have to be acquired, a cemetery moved, and multiple businesses relocated.

I grew up about a mile from where the Amite crosses hwy 432 (where the reservoir would begin) and we have family property in the area that would be flooded. I actually wouldn’t mind them doing this, but I don’t think it will do much, if anything to solve the issue of flooding. I believe the flooding is caused by the highways and interstates preventing water from draining naturally. I-12 is essentially a huge dam.

ETA: They're considering a permanent lake of around 230 acres. The rest would be dry flood plain, possibly WMA.
This post was edited on 12/13/19 at 11:58 am
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
12179 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:14 am to
They going to stock that thing with them Florida bass?
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48953 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:15 am to
What a boondoggle, it would just fill up and flood
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25687 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:19 am to
quote:

What a boondoggle, it would just fill up and flood


You do understand it will be a flood pool not a lake correct?
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48953 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:22 am to
Well the first line says it’s a reservoir, they need that 2 billion for the wall anyway
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67116 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:26 am to
I think it’s a solid project to add some flexibility to the flood control systems working in tangent with the comite diversion.
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
5814 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:28 am to
What politicians are pushing this and who owns most of the land ?
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25687 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:29 am to
quote:

Well the first line says it’s a reservoir, they need that 2 billion for the wall anyway


It is a flood pool and will only be a lake when the flow needs to be reduced below it.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67116 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:32 am to
This is not a new idea. It was floated back when Edwin was governor.
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
27106 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:40 am to
quote:

I don’t think it will do much, if anything to solve the issue of flooding. I believe the flooding is caused by the highways and interstates preventing water from draining naturally. I-12 is essentially a huge dam.


It's amazing how many experts the OT has. PawnMaster is a hydrologist, y'all.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53841 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:42 am to
The idea is to flood the people who built on high land to preserve the people who built in a flood plain.
Posted by Glock17
Member since Oct 2007
22391 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:42 am to
Seems like in 2016 a lot of the rain initially fell north of the BR area so something like this would have probably helped.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41634 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:51 am to
My great grandchildren will be so thankful when this is complete.
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17188 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:51 am to
How does this effect St George?

Not even official and it's already ... under water. :rimshot:
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57254 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:54 am to
Great idea! Let's confiscate land from folks who are high-and-dry and have been living in the area for generations to keep a bunch of folks (relative newcomers) who built in a flood zone from, well, flooding!
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57254 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:55 am to
quote:

I think it’s a solid project to add some flexibility to the flood control systems working in tangent with the comite diversion.


It's government theft of peoples' land for a boondoggle. Nothing more.

LINK

quote:

Tynes and others asked why they should be asked to sacrifice land that their families have held for generations and that have rural qualities that would be hard to find elsewhere, all for the benefit of people downstream who bought homes in flood-prone areas that have been overbuilt.

"Bad decisions on those people's part should not change my way of life, my parents' way of life, my wife's, my children's or anything like that," Cornette said.


What would the reaction be if the CoE decided to use Bayou Manchac as a diversion to route Amite water in to the Mississippi? That's what nature intended this body of water to do? Would folks be so eager to confiscate the land of those along the former Iberville River?
This post was edited on 12/13/19 at 7:59 am
Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
5875 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:56 am to
I'm betting we'll have flying cars before this happens. Comite Diversion is just a big drainage ditch and that has/is taking decades.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25365 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:57 am to
This would be huge for flood protection and for development/recreation in the northeastern part of the Baton Rouge metro.

Should have happened 35 years ago.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25365 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:59 am to
quote:

I believe the flooding is caused by the highways and interstates preventing water from draining naturally. I-12 is essentially a huge dam.


The reservoir would help prevent water from even getting that high.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57254 posts
Posted on 12/13/19 at 7:59 am to
quote:

This would be huge for flood protection and for development/recreation in the northeastern part of the Baton Rouge metro.


It's a proposed dry reservoir, not a lake.
This post was edited on 12/13/19 at 8:00 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram