Started By
Message

re: All of the eclipse haters weren't in the totality path

Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:27 am to
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13076 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:27 am to
I live where there was 98% coverage.

I learned 2% of the sun is pretty darn bright.

Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
85605 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:36 am to
Honestly, the only interesting part of the entire ordeal was Kige doing his selfie feed filming it, talking about how the sun was blocking the moon.
Posted by Blob Fish
Member since Mar 2016
3091 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:51 am to
quote:

consumed so much solar eclipse content in the past 20 years


I wasn't aware that there was 20 years worth of content to consume. Moon passes between the Earth and sun. It looks cool. Boom. Consumption over.
Posted by purpleleaf
Member since Aug 2011
4004 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:01 am to
ok
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 8:02 am
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
20886 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:03 am to
I was in the path of totality. It was surreal. Cicadas started getting really loud when it started getting dark. I saw a couple of hawks going freaking crazy...it was a pretty wild scene. The biggest thing for me was how quickly the temperature dropped. The other thing was how much different shadows looked as it approached totality. It was pretty strange.

The things that happened as a result of the sun being eclipsed, were as cool as actually seeing the eclipse.
Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:36 am to
I was in the 98.3% Totality path.I'm glad I watched it.

It was like dusk for a few minutes.The Birds and insects started making noise.

I thought it was pretty neat.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:40 am to
Completely agreed with the OP.

I've seen two annular eclipses (around 99% blockage) and although they were kinda neat it just wasn't the same.

It was sort of like, sure, the lower light is kinda freaky looking but still not much special. Then suddenly over the space of about two seconds it happened. It was like God had suddenly drawn a curtain across the universe. The Sun very suddenly turned completely black with a ghostly white glow around it.

TV coverage just doesn't do it justice. If you weren't in the path, you missed the show entirely and I feel sorry for you.
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 9:57 pm
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:43 am to
quote:

I was in the 98.3% Totality path.I'm glad I watched it.


It is neat at 98% but you missed the real show.
Posted by Tigris
Cloud Cuckoo Land
Member since Jul 2005
12818 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Totality was freakin amazing


It was, exceeded my expectations. The view of the corona around the sun and solar flares on the edges was awe inspiring. We had a good scope I brought and killer views and could see the movement of the moon across the face of the sun. It didn't get as dark as I expected, pretty dim but not dark. Only a few stars out. But the crickets started chirping and it cooled down some. And a hawk landed behind us when it started getting darker and flew off when the sun came back out.

Our planned spot didn't work out just north of Kansas City. So my brother and I improvised and headed east around 120 miles to get past the clouds. We found a nice sunny spot just north of Jefferson City, Mo. along the Missouri River. Heavy traffic on I-70 headed back, it took about twice as long as normal. But it was completely worth it.

Already planning 2024. Probably a mountain in Mexico.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:18 am to
quote:

All of the eclipse haters weren't in the totality path
No wonder it was a letdown for you guys

I was in the path and it was the most amazing spectacle I have ever seen. Totally worth sitting in bumper to bumper traffic right now. I am a huge astronomy nerd who has consumed so much solar eclipse content in the past 20 years and even then it blew away my expectations



This. I've seen partial eclipses in person and total eclipses on TV, but seeing a total eclipse in person was a completely different experience. Anyone who saw it partially, even if 90%+, claiming to be underwhelmed is just talking out of their arse and has no idea what they missed.
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:27 am to
quote:

I am a huge astronomy nerd who has consumed so much solar eclipse content in the past 20 years and even then it blew away my expectations

I thought you were a flat earther
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17024 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:45 am to
quote:

I am a huge astronomy nerd who has consumed so much solar eclipse content in the past 20 years


What does this mean? What is "consuming so much solar eclipse content?" How much content is there to consume? The moon passes in front of the sun, it looks kind of cool. Seems like the extent of content.
Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
25204 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:19 am to
I wrote my big 9th grade project paper on solar eclipses for example.
Posted by tigeroarz1
Winston-Salem, NC
Member since Oct 2013
3659 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:19 am to
quote:

It was the best natural phenomenon I have seen. Seen volcanoes erupt and the northern lights as well. This was better.
I was in 100% totality for over two minutes in SC. I've also witnessed the northern lights and have to agree a TOTAL eclipse is better. The difference between a 100% and 99% eclipse is incomparable. It's truly indescribable.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
164279 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:22 am to
Too bad you can't make secks to the sun.

KYS
Posted by BulldogXero
Member since Oct 2011
9950 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:24 am to
Something like 90% of the sun was covered here in MS. The sky looked odd. Almost like looking through a tinted car window, but it wasn't nearly as dark as you'd think given so much of the sun was covered. Just goes to show just how bright the sun is that it can light up that much of the sky with only 10% visible.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Anyone who saw it partially, even if 90%+, claiming to be underwhelmed is just talking out of their arse and has no idea what they missed.
I saw it at 97% and was truthfully very underwhelmed. I've spoken to many others that feel the same and seen social media posts from people claiming it to be the coolest thing ever. I just don't get it. It was interesting for a brief period of time, but far from spectacular.
Posted by Big Chipper
Charlotte, NC
Member since Sep 2008
2883 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I live where there was 98% coverage. I learned 2% of the sun is pretty darn bright.
98.4% at my house. It was like it was 8:30 pm on an early July night. Light enough to see, but you needed the lights on in the house. No way in hell I was going to face the interstate traffic for that last 1.6%.
Posted by CidCock
Member since Sep 2007
Member since Feb 2011
8675 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Completely agreed with the OP.

I've seen two annular eclipses (around 99% blockage) and although they were kinda neat it just wasn't the same.

It was sort of like, sure, the lower light is kinda freaky looking but still not much special. Then suddenly over the space of about two seconds it happened. It was like God had suddenly drawn a curtain across the universe. The Sun very suddenly turned completely black with a ghostly white glow around it.

TV coverage just doesn't do it justice. If you weren't in the path, you missed the show entirely and I feel sorry fory you.




This. I was pretty excited about it, but it exceeded my expectations. I couldn't believe how many out of staters came to Columbia, SC for it, but now I get it.

I will be in the path again for 2024. Aside from the birth my daughter, it was the most incredible thing I have ever experienced.
Posted by CidCock
Member since Sep 2007
Member since Feb 2011
8675 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:30 am to
quote:


This. I've seen partial eclipses in person and total eclipses on TV, but seeing a total eclipse in person was a completely different experience. Anyone who saw it partially, even if 90%+, claiming to be underwhelmed is just talking out of their arse and has no idea what they missed.



No doubt.

Annie Dillard's essay says it best.

quote:

I had seen a partial eclipse in 1970. A partial eclipse is very interesting. It bears almost no relation to a total eclipse. Seeing a partial eclipse bears the same relation to seeing a total eclipse as kissing a man does to marrying him, or as flying in an airplane does to falling out of an airplane. Although the one experience precedes the other, it in no way prepares you for it. During a partial eclipse the sky does not darken—not even when 94 percent of the sun is hidden. Nor does the sun, seen colorless through protective devices, seem terribly strange. We have all seen a sliver of light in the sky; we have all seen the crescent moon by day. However, during a partial eclipse the air does indeed get cold, precisely as if someone were standing between you and the fire. And blackbirds do fly back to their roosts. I had seen a partial eclipse before, and here was another.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram