Started By
Message

re: All eyes on Oregon as state law takes effect, decriminalizing possession of hard drugs

Posted on 2/1/21 at 7:29 pm to
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
136152 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 7:29 pm to
Who pays for the addiction treatment?
Posted by KemoSabe65
70605
Member since Mar 2018
6400 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 7:33 pm to
Yep bet those shake machines would be clean as a whistle with a methhead on staff.
Posted by yankeeundercover
Buffalo, NY
Member since Jan 2010
36419 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 7:34 pm to
So blow is cool in Oregon...? Any word on the hookers?
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
47239 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

You don’t have to go that far. Just visit Opelousas



Opelousas has its fair share of problems..... but is nowhere near in the level of portland.
Posted by Vidic
Member since Jan 2010
9505 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 7:41 pm to
They’d be better than the job you do already
This post was edited on 2/1/21 at 7:43 pm
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64154 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

I can't disagree. I'll be watching Oregon closely to see if usage actually increases with legalization.



They're not legalizing the drugs. They're simply changing how they punish people who they find with drugs. They won't punish for small amounts but they'll still come down on distribution and selling.
Posted by krones
Pacific Wonderland
Member since Sep 2010
415 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Meth has been rampant in rural Oregon for decades - of course, a lot of rural America has dealt with that, but still.



Yeah it's pretty out of hand here. Bad enough that you can't get cold medicine with pseudoephedrine without a prescription.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296985 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Hard drugs being illegal and the stigma associated with that absolutely keep some people away from doing them.


Nah.

How much has hard drug usage increased in places where drugs are decriminalized? Drugs like meth would not even exist if other drugs had been decriminalized long ago.
Posted by krones
Pacific Wonderland
Member since Sep 2010
415 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Who pays for the addiction treatment?



From the voter information pamphlet:

"To fund the centers, the measure requires legislative appropriations to the authority, redirects marijuana tax account balances above $11,250,000 quarterly to the authority and dedicates to the authority any savings to the state from reductions in arrests, incarceration and supervision resulting from the measure. Current law allocates marijuana tax revenue for other uses by state and local governments. The measure reduces the marijuana tax revenue for the other uses. The measure also requires that the Secretary of State biennially conduct a financial and performance audit of the fund established by the measure."
This post was edited on 2/1/21 at 8:03 pm
Posted by Eat Your Crow
caught beneath the landslide
Member since May 2017
9190 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

The new law only applies to possession and does not make it legal to sell, distribute or manufacture drugs.

lol wut
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53103 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Who pays for the addiction treatment?

Probably tax payers. Would it be more expensive than incarceration? I don't really have those answers but I don’t think our current system is really working.
Posted by krones
Pacific Wonderland
Member since Sep 2010
415 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

quote:
The new law only applies to possession and does not make it legal to sell, distribute or manufacture drugs.

lol wut




The idea is that addiction is a medical issue and enabling addicts is a crime. It's more about providing addicts with the the help they need without making them felons.

I voted for it. Maybe it won't work, but we can't afford to keep throwing these people in jail and releasing them with criminal records.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
47239 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

The idea is that addiction is a medical issue and enabling addicts is a crime. It's more about providing addicts with the the help they need without making them felons.

I voted for it. Maybe it won't work, but we can't afford to keep throwing these people in jail and releasing them with criminal records.


I’m more concerned with the suppliers. If you want to get rid of the problem you have to come down extremely hard on the people on the street peddling. The top down approach will never work too much money involved.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20554 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:30 pm to
As long as we dont revitalize ODs I am down.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16695 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

Probably tax payers. Would it be more expensive than incarceration? I don't really have those answers but I don’t think our current system is really working.


Tax payers pay for everything. And you got between 30-60k per person per year to cover rehab. Idk if that’s enough but frick it, let’s try something.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
58870 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Example: Don’t rush them to the hospital during an overdose.


That just makes you an a-hole
Posted by Vote4MikeAck504
Go Cocks!
Member since Mar 2019
3098 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 9:33 pm to
Every homeless junkie on the west coast is about to move to Portland.
Posted by Vote4MikeAck504
Go Cocks!
Member since Mar 2019
3098 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 9:34 pm to
They are defacto legalizing them with zero criminal penalties.
Posted by Vote4MikeAck504
Go Cocks!
Member since Mar 2019
3098 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 9:37 pm to
Rural Oregon is meth central.
Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3786 posts
Posted on 2/1/21 at 9:41 pm to
If the government in Oregon were smart, they would increase enforcement of actual crime and put money into local police agencies, earmarked for increased staffing and training. That way the drug legalization laws could actually be successful.

But they are not smart. With crime (especially gun violence) currently increasing as they further neuter their police depts, the drug legalization will likely just exacerbate some of the current problems.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram