- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alabama lawmakers have passed a near total ban on abortion
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:51 pm to tigerpimpbot
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:51 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:
It is not a "baby" being "murdered" because some cells pump coagulant.
At what point is it a baby then?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 8:00 pm to Centinel
When it can reasonably survive without being completely dependent on being inside the body of the mother.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 8:05 pm to Centinel
quote:
At what point is it a baby then?
It's not a baby at 6 weeks and it is definitely a baby before the last trimester. Just like the law was.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 8:07 pm to Centinel
quote:
At what point is it a baby then?
When it had brainwave activity. Same standard we use when we pull the plug on someone.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 8:13 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
quote:
At what point is it a baby then?
When it had brainwave activity. Same standard we use when we pull the plug on someone.
We keep a lot of brain dead people on life support.
It's a baby when it is genetically different from the mother, so about a week after conception.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 8:28 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:
When it can reasonably survive without being completely dependent on being inside the body of the mother.
So needing outside support is your definition of life? If so, people with pacemakers, on dialysis, ventilators etc would like a chat.....
Posted on 5/15/19 at 8:36 pm to JamalSanders
quote:
We keep a lot of brain dead people on life support.
True. But outside of Shivo, do religious morons cry murder when someone is unplugged?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 8:53 pm to East Coast Band
Please, let the state at the bottom of every important quality of life metric tell us how to govern.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:01 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:
That is the very definition of delusion. Hence, an honest discussion cannot be had. Your foundational premise is out of whack with the real world.
You wanna draw the line at the 3rd trimester. The baby’s organs are fully developed by then and developing sleeping habits all during the 2nd. Babies can and have been born prematurely and lived at 21 weeks and above. And at 3-6 months your raped argument is pretty much crap.
quote:
the way, since you are so opposed to abortion for "moral" reasons, how many children born from unwanted pregnancies have you adopted? I'll hang up and listen.
Dude, the only reason I even replied in this thread is because someone said that raped women would be forced to carry to term and I said there are other options besides carrying to term which in most instances of rape is correct. In the post you replied to I even said this bill was extreme. I just don’t think that using the “incest and rape” excuse is good enough considering it only accounts for a small amount of abortions. It’s an intellectually dishonest argument that elicits emotion for abortion even though it amounts for a small amount of abortions done. It’s the same argument that the left uses for gun control after mass shootings whenever only a small percentage of gun deaths occur from mass shootings but it elicits a more emotional response. But what would I expect from morally inept assholes.
This post was edited on 5/15/19 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:08 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
You didn’t answer my question because, as you know, your answer would serve to expose you as a phony moralist hypocrite. Par for the course, roll tide
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:56 am to tigerpimpbot
I’ve stayed out of his thread for a number of reasons, mainly because abortion is the 1 issue where I legitimately see both sides of the argument, but I just read (and I haven’t been able to verify the accuracy so if it’s incorrect please tell me) that a proposed amendment that would have provided for medical care up to age 3 for any child the state required to be carried to term & it was defeated 23-6.
That really reinforced the perception that pro-life advocates only really care about life up until the moment of birth and not a second longer.
That really reinforced the perception that pro-life advocates only really care about life up until the moment of birth and not a second longer.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:00 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
provided for medical care up to age 3
What state has this law?
It's not like the child gets nothing now. There still is Medicaid and food stamps.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:05 am to East Coast Band
quote:
What state has this law?
What state has this law indeed, oh the irony
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 7:06 am
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:07 am to Centinel
quote:
At what point is it a baby then?
At what point should child support be enforced? At what point should government benefits kick in?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:08 am to Draconian Sanctions
The state provides food, free housing (priority is given to those women who have children), and free education.
The current job market is strong in Alabama.
The current job market is strong in Alabama.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:45 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
but I just read (and I haven’t been able to verify the accuracy so if it’s incorrect please tell me) that a proposed amendment that would have provided for medical care up to age 3 for any child the state required to be carried to term & it was defeated 23-6.
This is the first I've heard of that, so I lean towards it being false.
quote:
That really reinforced the perception that pro-life advocates only really care about life up until the moment of birth and not a second longer.
A lot of people have no idea what the purpose of the Alabama bill is. It's sole job and why it was crafted the way it was and uses the specific language it uses is to be challenged and work it's way to the Supreme Court to attempt to over turn RvW.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:50 am to JamalSanders
quote:
This is the first I've heard of that, so I lean towards it being false.
That you haven’t heard about doesn’t mean anything
quote:
It's sole job and why it was crafted the way it was and uses the specific language it uses is to be challenged and work it's way to the Supreme Court to attempt to over turn RvW.
I’m glad everything is so peachy keen in Alabama that you’ve solved all your local and state problems and can now focus on trying to overturn SCOTUS decisions.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 7:52 am
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:51 am to Draconian Sanctions
One doesn’t have to believe in expanding welfare programs in order to believe an unborn child shouldn’t be aborted.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:53 am to SabiDojo
quote:
One doesn’t have to believe in expanding welfare programs in order to believe an unborn child shouldn’t be aborted.
I didn’t say you did, in fact my exact post says that it gives the impression that pro life advocates care about a child up until the moment of birth and not a second after. Sounds like you’re not disagreeing
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 7:54 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News