- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 8/9/19 at 1:58 pm to SeeeeK
quote:
“His intent was not to cause peace or comfort to anybody that was in the business. In fact, he’s lucky to be alive still to be honest,” he told reporters.
People like that prick should be shot.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 1:59 pm to Dizz
574.115. Making a terrorist threat, first degree — penalty. — 1. A person commits the offense of making a terrorist threat in the first degree if such person, with the purpose of frightening ten or more people or causing the evacuation, quarantine or closure of any portion of a building, inhabitable structure, place of assembly or facility of transportation, knowingly:
(1) Communicates an express or implied threat to cause an incident or condition involving danger to life; or
(2) Communicates a false report of an incident or condition involving danger to life; or
(3) Causes a false belief or fear that an incident has occurred or that a condition exists involving danger to life.
2. The offense of making a terrorist threat in the first degree is a class D felony.
3. No offense is committed under this section by a person acting in good faith with the purpose to prevent harm.
Wouldn't you say there is at least a suspicion of this? Enough to detain the guy and ask a few questions?
(1) Communicates an express or implied threat to cause an incident or condition involving danger to life; or
(2) Communicates a false report of an incident or condition involving danger to life; or
(3) Causes a false belief or fear that an incident has occurred or that a condition exists involving danger to life.
2. The offense of making a terrorist threat in the first degree is a class D felony.
3. No offense is committed under this section by a person acting in good faith with the purpose to prevent harm.
Wouldn't you say there is at least a suspicion of this? Enough to detain the guy and ask a few questions?
Posted on 8/9/19 at 2:28 pm to Supermoto Tiger
I wouldn't sympathize with him whatsoever if someone had shot him. Tensions are way too high to be pulling a stunt like this and you are 100% tempting fate. Look at Times Square after that motorcycle backfired.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 2:54 pm to QJenk
quote:
Call me anti-American. But I'm not ok with this. I'm all for the 2nd amendment, and people being able to carry protection for themselves everywhere.
There is no reason at all for someone to be carrying a large-scale weapon like that. There is no other reason than to be an ahole who thinks they're a badass, while also spreading mass fear. Its stupid.
Not only the rifle but the 100 round drum mag as well. Atlanta has the world's busiest airport, imagine arriving as a foreigner and seeing this jackass walking around like that.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:11 pm to slackster
quote:I think his point is, maybe it should be?
Carrying around a bomb is illegal, open carrying is not.
Eliminate open carry, if you want to carry in public have a concealed carry license
I'm sure I'll be called a libtard for that take though.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:20 pm to TBoy
quote:You understand this is on the spectrum of the left's arguments, right? They can just say "he stockpiles weapons like a mass murderer" in response to gun guys buying a lot of guns and ammo. Don't kid yourself into believing your stance is actually different than the left's just because your standard is this public display and there's is inside your home. It's a difference of degree, not principle.
It’s guys like this that make it impossible to differentiate between law abiding people and mass murderers. He dresses up like a mass murderer and goes into a crowded public place. How are we to know his innermost true desires? Screw that guy.
The only principled stand here is that the kid did NOTHING wrong and was kidnapped.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:22 pm to Rabbs and QStick
quote:And the left will say that "common sense" dictates YOU owning 25 guns inside your home is a reason to take away your rights.
You can use common sense without taking away rights
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:22 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
I think his point is, maybe it should be?
Open carry, on the surface, is the most fundamental right to bear arms.
The fact that 99% of people that do it are DBs should be irrelevant.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:29 pm to slackster
quote:Why is that? By eliminating open carry, you aren't removing the ability to own guns. You aren't eliminating the ability to carry guns. You're just eliminating the ability to display guns on your person, while in public.
Open carry, on the surface, is the most fundamental right to bear arms.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:32 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
the kid did NOTHING wrong and was kidnapped.
That really depends on what his motivations were for going to Wal-Mart geared up like he did
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:34 pm to jchamil
quote:
That really depends on what his motivations were for going to Wal-Mart geared up like he did
We're throwing people in jail now for motivations?
Intent without a crime isn't a crime.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:35 pm to 9Fiddy
Yeah it's always funny to see self proclaimed conservatives on here promoting thought crime.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:36 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Why is that? By eliminating open carry, you aren't removing the ability to own guns. You aren't eliminating the ability to carry guns. You're just eliminating the ability to display guns on your person, while in public.
You are limiting the type of guns they can carry.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:36 pm to jchamil
quote:Again, same language as the left. Why does Mr. Smith down the street "need" to buy 50 guns? Has he done something wrong? Well, that depends on his motivations for buying 50 guns. The natural endpoint of this logic is that the right is abridgeable based purely on the judgment of what is going on inside someone else's head.
That really depends on what his motivations were for going to Wal-Mart geared up like he did
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:36 pm to 9Fiddy
quote:
We're throwing people in jail now for motivations?
Well motivations plus actions.
quote:
Intent without a crime isn't a crime.
Who says there wasn't a crime?
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:36 pm to Obtuse1
quote:We already do that, don't we?
You are limiting the type of guns they can carry.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:37 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Well, that depends on his motivations for buying 50 guns.
That is not the same scenario we are talking about here
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:39 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Why is that? By eliminating open carry, you aren't removing the ability to own guns. You aren't eliminating the ability to carry guns. You're just eliminating the ability to display guns on your person, while in public.
Which, in turn, eliminates essentially any long gun from being carried in public.
Like I said earlier, if they ban open carry, it will be no skin off my back in a practical sense, but from a principled standpoint, you're going to have a problem.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:39 pm to jchamil
quote:
Who says there wasn't a crime?
No one has come forward and said there was yet. I think that's been the general gist of this thread. At this time, the only crime we see being committed is kidnapping.
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News