Started By
Message
locked post

77 Years Ago Today: Operation Barbarossa

Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:12 am
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74618 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:12 am
June 22, 1941. This is the day Hitler cast aside the non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union and hurled three Army Groups eastward. Army Group North pushed into Lithuania toward Leningrad. Army Group Center struck at Belorussia toward Moscow. And Army Group South invaded Ukraine.

This marked the beginning of what would become the most vicious and bloody front of the most vicious and bloody war in history. The slaughter would extend from the very gates of Moscow and banks of the Volga River before finally ending in the ruins of Berlin in May of 1945. From a strictly military standpoint the losses on both sides boggole the mind:

KIA (killed in action)
Germany: 5.5 million
USSR: 10 million

Tanks lost
Germany: 42,700
USSR: 96,500

Aircraft lost
Germany: 75,700
USSR: 102,600

When the fighting finally stopped in May 1945 Europe was forever changed. Germany lay in ruins, divided and occupied in its entirety by her Enemies. The Soviet Union, though reeling from the total loss of over 20 million combined military and civilian deaths (German numbers were similar BTW), was the undisputed master of all of Eastern Europe and a bonified World Super Power. It would go on to shape world events and power structures for most of the 20th century until it’s collapse in the early 1990s.




LINK
Posted by Righteous Dude
Member since Oct 2017
1556 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:17 am to
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85534 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:17 am to
What a mess
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39230 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:18 am to
Thank god for Ivan and his will to just throw man after man into the jaws of death.
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22046 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:19 am to
Never understood why the Germans thought they could fight on so many fronts simultaneously. Cocky SOBs
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58830 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:22 am to
Should've learned from WW1. Germans slaughtered them and yet the Russkies would throw up more armies. Germans needed a trick at the end to beat them.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68603 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Thank god for Ivan and his will to just throw man after man into the jaws of death

Agree....it didn't hurt that Germany had to cross a shitload of land
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56772 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Never understood why the Germans thought they could fight on so many fronts simultaneously. Cocky SOBs



I don't think it was cockiness; it was necessity. Stalin had no intention of honoring their NAP and the German high command thought it better to defect first and catch the Soviets with their pants down.
Posted by go_tigres
Member since Sep 2013
5494 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:26 am to
Imagine how things would have turned out had Hitlers vanity not gotten the best of him.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56194 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:28 am to
Here's the main reason it failed.

On 30 July 1941, which is only one month and eight days after invasion, the spearhead of the German Army Group Center was 447 miles away from the nearest railhead.

Supplies were delivered to a railhead and then to the fighting forces by ground transport. Most ground transport was horse drawn wagons. Some ground transport used motor lorries such as trucks.

In 1941, the Germans were never able to get the railheads close enough to the fighting forces to provide adequate supply. 447 miles is a long way from the front, and, the Germans could only build the railroad track eastward very slowly.
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 11:21 am
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56772 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Imagine how things would have turned out had Hitlers vanity not gotten the best of him.



As I understand it, it was his generals' vanity, and not his, that caused them to overly focus on the symbolic capture of Volgograd and Moscow instead of the Ukrainian oil fields that they so desperately needed to continue war manufacturing.
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 10:43 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
105178 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:30 am to
Let us all give thanks that Hitler and the German High Command were too goddamn arrogant for their own good.


The thing that gave them early success is what ended up losing it for them... a total lack of cold weather preparations.

The Russians figured that the Germans weren’t stupid enough to start an offensive without moving assets into place to withstand an inevitable Russian winter, so they weren’t on alert when the Germans rolled through and pushed them back.

It worked until they got bogged down and the weather changed, at which point the Russians said “We have reserves” and started bleeding the German military of men and resources through prolonged battles in places like Stalingrad.
Posted by Teufelhunden
Galvez, LA
Member since Feb 2005
6044 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:30 am to
Got off to a late start and the focus should have been the oil in the south.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39230 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:31 am to
The Germans were also hoping the japs would join in and strike from the south. They really tried to pressure, although not directly, japan into attacking the Far East before the onset of Barbarossa.

Of course, this didn’t happen. And once Stalin realized this, he pulled his elite troops out of the Far East and put them right on the front by Stalingrad (I believe) which helped play an important role in that battle.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56194 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:34 am to
Bear in mind that Operation Barbarossa refers to the opening 1941 offensive and is not the name for the entire War on the Eastern Front from 1941 to 1945.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74618 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Never understood why the Germans thought they could fight on so many fronts simultaneously. Cocky SOBs



This is a very good question. The long-held German nightmare had always been the dreaded “two-front” war. This fear had dominated Germany military thought since the 19th century and was why the conflict that started in the Balkans in 1914 had turned into WWI.

As to what made Hitler to decide to risk this nightmare once again, two things factored into it.

1. Hitler thought that while Britian still remained in the War, they could not really do anything. Remember in spring 1941, America was not in the war. France has been conquered. And Britian, had no real army left. Sure they had rescued thousands of British troops at Dunkirk. But they’d had to leave behind almost all their heavy equipment like artillery and tanks. So I’m Hitler’s mind, it would be years before Britian was a threat again. He saw his western flank as secure for the foreseeable future, which it was.

2. Hitler knew the Red Army recovering from the Stalinist purged of the 30’s. And even more alarming he saw the Soviets were starting to build up the Red Army to the point it would be a serious threat in the near future. In spring 41, the Red Army was in a transitional stage. It was not close to being ready for war. But Hitler knew that within the next few years, it would be.

So basically it came down to a matter of Hitler seeing it was “now or never” when it came to achieving his longtime goal of crushing the Soviet Union and establishing is dreamed of German Empire in the East. In his gamblers eyes he saw a window of opportunity that would not stay open for much longer. Thus, he decided to strike while he could.
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Marathon, FL
Member since Oct 2005
14743 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Never understood why the Germans thought they could fight on so many fronts simultaneously. Cocky SOBs


You have to understand what they just did. They invaded and conquered France, in 22 days. They hadn't been able to do that in 4 years during World War 1. They also conquered most of Western Europe in a matter of months. Another thing they were unable to do in the years during World War 1. They had a reason to be confident that they could defeat Russia. England did not look like it was going to interfere. Italy was on their side. The United States was not in the game yet.
Posted by Bama and Beer
Baldwin Co, AL
Member since Oct 2010
85814 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:35 am to
This stuff is so intriguing to me
Posted by btnetigers
South Louisiana
Member since Aug 2015
2332 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:36 am to
Let's not forget about that horrible Russian winter. The Germans never thought that weather would be a cause that would ruin their chance at victory. Stupid fricks.

Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56772 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Of course, this didn’t happen.


It's really strange when you think about it. Obviously, the Japanese had their hands full with American action in the Pacific, but that the USSR didn't make tremendous gains in China/Mongolia and to press southward and cut off Japanese war resources is pretty odd. I guess it was a logistical issue because manpower sure as shite wasn't a problem.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram