- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 737max crashes in Ethiopia. Killing 157
Posted on 3/11/19 at 6:07 pm to When in Rome
Posted on 3/11/19 at 6:07 pm to When in Rome
If the plane starts acting erratically, shouldn’t the first thing the pilot does is disable all of the automated systems and take over manually?
Posted on 3/11/19 at 6:28 pm to LSU Fan SLU Grad
quote:
first thing the pilot does is disable all of the automated systems
The MCAS system is designed only to lower the nose to reduce AoA when the flaps are retracted and the autopilot disengaged.
Most airlines, especially overseas, school their pilots to engage the AP at a certain altitude with corresponding airspeed. So, theoretically, this flight has just departed and climbing out passing 2000 ft the AP is engaged and flaps are retracted with speed checks. Somehow, whether software is in conflict with the FMS, or there is another glitch in the system. 737 Max has a new fly by wire spoiler system that is only available on the MAX 8/9. The plane should not be porpoising at 6500 ft on climb out. If the MCAS activated with the aircraft on A/P thats bad. If the aircraft suddenly increased its AoA uncommanded and induced a stick shake, very bad.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 7:08 pm to baldona
quote:
I also would bet they have some real slouches that would never be touched by a domestic carrier or the other top airlines in the world.
Most heavy maintenance for U.S> carriers is performed in countries outside the U.S.
Article is from 2015
LINK
"Over the past decade, nearly all large U.S. airlines have shifted heavy maintenance work on their airplanes to repair shops thousands of miles away, in developing countries, where the mechanics who take the planes apart (completely) and put them back together (or almost) may not even be able to read or speak English. US Airways and Southwest fly planes to a maintenance facility in El Salvador. Delta sends planes to Mexico. United uses a shop in China. American still does much of its most intensive maintenance in-house in the U.S., but that is likely to change in the aftermath of the company’s merger with US Airways."
This post was edited on 3/11/19 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 3/11/19 at 7:17 pm to OchoDedos
Posted on 3/11/19 at 7:33 pm to EA6B
quote:
Most heavy maintenance for U.S> carriers is performed in countries outside the U.S.
Article is from 2015
This plane was 3 months old...
Posted on 3/11/19 at 7:43 pm to Boss
CNN also shared this cringeworthy graphic of “wingspan”. Note a problem?

Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:00 pm to When in Rome
Reminds me of the USA Today AR modification tweets


Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:03 pm to upgrayedd
I was like, that's clearly my à real tweet. I Googled, and yep it did happen.
The response tweets were hilarious.
The response tweets were hilarious.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:06 pm to castorinho
quote:
The response tweets were hilarious.

Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:11 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
upgrayedd
I don’t know if you saw my post on the PB thread about the green berets. But it’s a fricking doosy. I think you’ll enjoy it
This post was edited on 3/11/19 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:29 pm to LSU Fan SLU Grad
quote:
If the plane starts acting erratically, shouldn’t the first thing the pilot does is disable all of the automated systems and take over manually?
Yes, but a lot the modern ( last 25ish years) aircraft have been built with computer systems that even with AP disengaged, pilot inputs are relegated to whatever phase of flight the computer thinks it is in.
So a computer receives an input from a static port or pitot tube that is malfunctioning, so the computer thinks the aircraft is at cruise altitude due to the malfunction. The pilot knows the aircraft is only a few thousand feet or less from the ground and makes a pitch and power correction for the correct phase of flight. The computer will over ride the pilot in most situations to “prevent” the pilot from receiving the full input.
There are checklist to disable these systems but after initial takeoff, that would be a tall order for a crew.
Not saying that is what happened in this case, but just saying disconnection the AP doesn’t always give the Pilot full control of the aircraft.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:32 pm to Traveler
Apparently the 737max will struggle to maintain altitude when the fuel tanks are not empty.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:37 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
I don’t know if you saw my post on the PB thread about the green berets. But it’s a fricking doosy. I think you’ll enjoy it
I saw your theoretical story and chuckled. I'll go back and check it out
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:42 pm to upgrayedd
Yes it was all very “theoretical”
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:49 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Sounds very Floridian
Popular
Back to top


2






