Started By
Message

re: 65% of teachers are ‘uncomfortable’ with returning to school, survey from AEA says

Posted on 7/29/20 at 1:12 pm to
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
72718 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 1:12 pm to
There’s just little to no payoff to being a teacher in 2020. Specifically, I mean the passionate young good teachers. No matter how much they care, how hard they work, how much extra they take on, or how well they perform there is no payoff or benefit to high performance.

Some may get a stipend for taking on a club or sport, but if you do the hours/stipend calculation, it’s not even minimum wage.

Teachers can’t get performance based raises. Nor can they transfer for higher pay at a different school. Imagine having no career path, none. While having to work with lazy fricking morons, deal with society’s little assholes, and get constant shite from bad parents. I do not blame hungry, talented, career oriented people for not wanting to teach - why would they?
This post was edited on 7/29/20 at 1:34 pm
Posted by baobabtiger
Member since May 2009
4922 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 1:13 pm to
Of course they are. We paid them to stay at home for 6-7 months and do very little. Not sure what we expected to hear.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31636 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Truth be told, it isn't very good where I live. That's why there is a very large amount of private schools here. When I pulled my daughter out of public school and into private, I was amazed at how many students at the private school, had parents who were public school teachers. Hmmmm... wonder why that is?



The public school are so ridiculously inept that the State had to take over 2 yrs ago. They can't keep a superintendent for more than a couple of years.

I sent both of mine to private K-12 because we had no choice. And I'd say 75% of the upper school teachers at our private school were retired public school teachers, damn good teachers too.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
13907 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

I’ve pointed this out in previous threads, but I’ll share it here. I’ve been home since March. In that time, I’ve created lessons for students online. I’ve used programs designed for classroom management and have had to completely shift gears and turn them into my main form of communication with students.

My class does not involve much written work. I’ve had zoom sessions throughout the spring and summer. I’ve given free music lessons to my students over the summer. I still went up to the school and coordinated instrument pickup and drop off days. Why did they drop them off for a month and a half? It’s because I took them to get professionally cleaned in light of these current events.

We are also hosting a summer music camp for a marching season we may or may not have. This is all done virtually. The only reason I am able to respond frequently now is because we are doing 2 a days.


I'm glad you are giving some limited instruction. Let me ask you this, do you think working 2 days a week deserves the same pay as you were making prior to the pandemic? My daughter goes to a decent public school. She was given an assignment for one class, each day. She completed it less than an hour. None of the assignments were graded. Little to no personal contact with any teacher. She basically logged onto the computer, did the assignment and never heard from that teacher until the next week when another assignment was posted. There was absolutely, no teaching happening. It was the akin to me dropping her off at a library, and telling her to read a book.

The fact of the matter is, a lot of money is being thrown at education. The public is getting very little in return for the money we pay in our taxes. Now we have 65% of teachers surveyed, saying they don't want to go back to work, and if they do, it will be similar to what you are doing. The equivalent of 2 days a week.
This post was edited on 7/29/20 at 1:41 pm
Posted by Jesterea
Member since Nov 2011
1046 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 2:08 pm to
I mean, it’ll be different in every district in the country. I wouldn’t throw blanket statements around. Your right though, what would you suggest our pay be?
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28904 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Let me ask you this, do you think working 2 days a week deserves the same pay as you were making prior to the pandemic?


2 a days means two sessions a day, not two days a week. Discussing pay with a coach or extra curricular teacher is touchy. I get a stipend for band activities, and received one for coaching basketball and golf in the past. If you do the math, my athletic stipends came out to me making about $6.25 an hour.

quote:

She was given an assignment for one class, each day. She completed it less than an hour. None of the assignments were graded. Little to no personal contact with any teacher. She basically logged onto the computer, did the assignment and never heard from that teacher until the next week when another assignment was posted.


It’s difficult to judge things based on how last year finished. It was a free for all. Schools were not the only places that were blindsided by the pandemic. The issue simple exposed how unequipped districts are in going online.

quote:

The fact of the matter is, a lot of money is being thrown at education. The public is getting very little in return for the money we pay in our taxes.


This is a very opinionated statement, where results differ from region. I assume if you polled people in the DFW area, Katy, Austin, Northside San Antonio, etc. in my home state, you would get some different answers.

quote:

Now we have 65% of teachers surveyed


This survey that you have latched on to polled less than .5% of teachers in America.

quote:

I'm glad you are giving some limited instruction.


That was a not-so-subtle shot.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28904 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

I'm glad you are giving some limited instruction.


It’s funny. Normally if something isn’t satisfactory, you put in more resources. I don’t think that’s the opinion here. It’s probably similar to ‘defund the police’
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
13907 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

I mean, it’ll be different in every district in the country. I wouldn’t throw blanket statements around. Your right though, what would you suggest our pay be?
A good start would be making pay based on performance. Base salary plus bonus for classes that excel. Sliding scale with disincentives for poor results, mainly losing your job. Unfortunately, tenure makes it almost impossible to get rid of a poor teacher.



Posted by LSUnGA
Buford, GA
Member since Jun 2009
1699 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

A good start would be making pay based on performance. Base salary plus bonus for classes that excel. Sliding scale with disincentives for poor results, mainly losing your job. Unfortunately, tenure makes it almost impossible to get rid of a poor teacher.


Not a teacher and not related to any teachers. But in that profession I don't see how you do that in a manner that is fair. Depending on the age, area, parental involvement, etc the results may or may not be reflective as to how good a teacher really is.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
13907 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

It’s funny. Normally if something isn’t satisfactory, you put in more resources. I don’t think that’s the opinion here. It’s probably similar to ‘defund the police’
Ha! Isn't that what they did in St. Louis and DC a few years back. Some of the worst performing school systems in the country, yet the highest per capita spent per student.

You questioning the survey the OP posted, yet I'm seeing that at higher numbers from my FB feed, from teachers I know in different parts of the country.

Let me ask you this, name a profession where you get paid your full salary, but do much less work, and provide much less benefit to your employer? Teachers, as a whole, do not want to go back to teaching in schools, yet want their full salary. When you factor in how much is being spent on education, it's just a matter of time before people start questioning why day cares can be staffed and open, but schools cannot.

Let me put it this way, if you are paying $10K/year in tuition for a private school for your kid, the school does not open, and everything is virtual learning, how long before you start questioning the investment you've made into your kids education?
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
13907 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Not a teacher and not related to any teachers. But in that profession I don't see how you do that in a manner that is fair. Depending on the age, area, parental involvement, etc the results may or may not be reflective as to how good a teacher really is.


Easy. Start with a base line, and go from there. The goal should be to see improvement.

Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31636 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Not a teacher and not related to any teachers. But in that profession I don't see how you do that in a manner that is fair. Depending on the age, area, parental involvement, etc the results may or may not be reflective as to how good a teacher really is.

quote:

Easy. Start with a base line, and go from there. The goal should be to see improvement.



Bingo!

I participated in a reading program with a local public elementary school a few years ago. I was assigned a 5th grader, he was reading on a freaking 2nd grade reading level. The kid couldn't fluently read even the most basic 1st grade readers without help. How in the world did he advance to 5th grade when he couldn't read?

The No Child Left Behind initiative has forced teachers to advance kids to the next grade when they are severely deficient in some of the most basic skills.


Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28904 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Some of the worst performing school systems in the country, yet the highest per capita spent per student.


Yes, because inner-city DC and St. Louis are bastions for quality education. There’s much more at play in those school systems and you know it.

quote:

You questioning the survey the OP posted, yet I'm seeing that at higher numbers from my FB feed, from teachers I know in different parts of the country.


We get it. You know many teachers for someone in the medical field.

quote:

name a profession where you get paid your full salary, but do much less work, and provide much less benefit to your employer?


My friend works in the accounting department for a major company. His company runs budgets for doctor’s and dental offices. He has been working from home since March. He admitted that he has spent much less time working, mostly because many dental offices have closed, or are still closed. His workload has significantly decreased, he’s at home, and still getting paid.

Your mentioning of providing less benefit to the employer is debatable. The school system was screwed when the pandemic hit, but not because of teachers. Immediately, debates centered around standardized testing and the impact that has on funding. The benefit I provided to my employer was limited by what my employer needed and demanded.

quote:

Teachers, as a whole, do not want to go back to teaching in schools,


Your only way of proving this was referring to a survey of less than .5% of the teachers in the country and what your friends say in FB. Simply put, that’s not good enough.

quote:

Let me put it this way, if you are paying $10K/year in tuition for a private school for your kid, the school does not open, and everything is virtual learning, how long before you start questioning the investment you've made into your kids education?


Then homeschool your child. As for your taxpayer dollars going to schools...it’s no different than people saying ‘you chose to become a teacher, you knew what you were getting into.’

‘You chose to live in this area, you knew you would pay taxes into these schools.’
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
38570 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Normally if something isn’t satisfactory, you put in more resources.


Normally, when a person or organization underperforms for the given compensation you don't reward them with more compensation. This fallacy that the problem with the American education system is due to insufficient resources needs to be stamped out. Compared to 50-75 years ago, America spends a ton more per student. I don't anyone can argue that the standard of education has risen in that same time frame.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28904 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Normally, when a person or organization underperforms for the given compensation you don't reward them with more compensation.


And when you exceed your expectations, do you not expect a raise? Teachers don’t get more for success nor less for failures. The road goes both ways.

quote:

Compared to 50-75 years ago, America spends a ton more per student


Or....this could be an example of inflation. People demand more from school systems also. More free lunches, bigger athletic programs and facilities, more technology in schools, more tutors within the schools. This one really isn’t hard to figure out.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
38570 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Or....this could be an example of inflation.


Or...not. Adjusted for inflation, we spend tons more. A lot of which does not end up in the classroom but the bloated education bureaucracy.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28904 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

. A lot of which does not end up in the classroom but the bloated education bureaucracy.



How does this relate to the OP and following discussion. It’s the fault of teachers that tax dollars are misused by local leaders?
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
82627 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

What annoys me is that the left is content to let the teacher unions take full control of this issue while giving absolutely no consideration to working parents, IEP children, or young children who are completely incompatible with online school.



This is what blows my mind too. These people who claim to care so much about the low income/at-risk people in our society have strangely take the stance that we shouldn't have them in school.

You would think left-leaning people would want the opposite. It makes no sense to me.
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
14790 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 4:31 pm to
I'm a teacher. I'm so ready to be back at work.... my kids are driving me crazy.
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
82627 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Got an email I'll send you the data but home school students score on average 2.2 points better



Yeah, but to be fair.. isn't this mostly correlated to the type of parents who choose to homeschool their children? Homeschooled students usually come from households that are much healthier than, say, an inner city at-risk kid.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram