Started By
Message

re: 50 employees fired after refusing flu shot

Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:41 am to
Posted by Blob Fish
Member since Mar 2016
3091 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:41 am to
The same people who will complain about how many patients get sick while IN hospitals are probably the ones protesting their right to refuse a shot that, according to the CDC, is 40-60% effective with minimal risks.

Not Mother Jones

But they, of course, know more than the rest of us. It's all about "big pharma" and money.

Idiots.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51283 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:42 am to
quote:

then explain to me why expenditures are higher yet life expectancy is now going down.


B/c people are a lot unhealthier now. So they require more care but fail to make the lifestyle changes that result in longer life.
Posted by lsunurse
Member since Dec 2005
129003 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:42 am to
quote:

but I am typing this from work sick as hell with flu like symptoms because calling in sick is the end of the world.


I've been sick this week as well. However, I stayed home Monday when I felt the worst and was actually febrile.


Our hospital has a points attendance system. You call out, you get 4 points(even if you have a doctor's note). Clock in one minute late...you get a point. Come in early and forget to clock in...another point. And so on and so on. You get 16 points....verbal warning...get 24 points total...written warning and it goes on your record(and you can lose tuition reimbursement for it). Get 32 points...fired.


So basically you are penalized for calling out sick. When getting sick as a healthcare worker is an occupational hazard. I don't get points anymore in my role because I'm salaried. So that means I can actually stay home when I'm sick and not worry about being penalized. Before though...I came to work sick a couple times because if I called out I would have gotten too many points and would have faced disciplinary action and lost out on 6k worth of tuition reimbursement. Merely because I happened to get sick while caring for sick children.


ETA: I will say though the times I came in sick I wore a mask the entire shift and refused to care for any patients that were immunocompromised.
This post was edited on 11/22/17 at 7:48 am
Posted by Orange_and_Blur
Gainesville
Member since Nov 2017
644 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:43 am to
quote:

You’re replying to one of at least three healthcare professionals in this very thread alone.


Great. Any other fallacies of argumentation you'd like to advance?

Posted by Corch O
HereWhat
Member since Oct 2017
304 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:43 am to
That'll teach 'em.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171037 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:45 am to
So you make the claim but I have to provide evidence? Not how it works, bud.
Posted by Orange_and_Blur
Gainesville
Member since Nov 2017
644 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:46 am to
I'll just leave this here for now, but you geniuses have fun stroking each other's ego:

The three-judge panel wrote that the hospital’s policy of allowing religious or medical exemptions to the flu shot requirement “unconstitutionally discriminated against” plaintiff June Valent by rejecting her refusal to be vaccinated for secular reasons....CDC sponsored study published last year showed that flu vaccinations among healthcare workers offer no evidence of protection to the patients under their care.... according to settled cases by the U.S. Government for damages due to vaccine injuries, the flu vaccine is the most dangerous vaccine in the U.S.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171037 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Not relevant to this conversation.


Only because it debunks your theory
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131390 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:47 am to
As often as hospitals are sued, you don’t think their risk management people made double damn sure the hospital was well within their legal rights?

U dum
Posted by Beessnax
Member since Nov 2015
9148 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:48 am to
I fail to understand how someone can be educated as a nurse and still refuse the shot. I've taken it for at least a decade.. Every year.

I haven't had the flu since I have been getting the shot. No missed days from being sick. No risks of infecting my patients. Get the shot if you choose to work in health care. It makes a difference.
Posted by Orange_and_Blur
Gainesville
Member since Nov 2017
644 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:48 am to
quote:

So you make the claim but I have to provide evidence? Not how it works, bud.


You made a claim of advancements, I didn't.

Now....provide the evidence. I've already provided a rebuttal and narrowed the frame for you, as an act of charity.

Perhaps you should go back and take some courses in logic or argumentation. I recommend you pick up Toulmin's classic to help you along.
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:48 am to
The company I work for has a mandatory policy to receive the flu vaccine. You can opt out if it is determined that you have health problems that would be exacerbated by taking it, but it is not as simple as getting a note from your doctor.

If you don't take the vaccine, you have to wear PPE at work at all times.
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
30616 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Good. If you're going to put patients at risk you don't deserve to work in healthcare


Are all the patients and patient’s family members required to get a flu shot before they walk into that healthcare facility?

Moot point when half of the population in a hospital or healthcare facility has not gotten a flu shot.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171037 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:52 am to
I take it you’re a sophomore at UF, read a book on logical fallacies, and can’t wait to name each one

You made a claim that healthcare had not advanced in the last 100 years. Someone immediately reference the polio vaccine, you immediately say “nope doesn’t count.”

What’s the book say on that one?
This post was edited on 11/22/17 at 7:53 am
Posted by lsunurse
Member since Dec 2005
129003 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Are all the patients and patient’s family members required to get a flu shot before they walk into that healthcare facility?


They aren't interacting and caring for other patients like healthcare workers are.

One nurse could be assigned 6 patients that shift to care for. Discharges a few of those and admits a few. So that one nurse could have cared for 10 different people.

Respiratory therapist could have given SVN treatments to 15 different people during their shift.


Phlebotomist could have drawn blood on 40 people during her shift.


ETA: Also...most hospitals enforce respiratory season visitor limitations during flu season. Our hospital won't allow children 12 and younger to visit anyone in the hospital without special arrangements from the physician during flu season. Staff are to screen visitors and those that exhibit any respiratory symptoms are asked to not visit or special arrangements made (visitor wears a mask, only briefly visits). Signs are posted everywhere asking visitors that are ill to not visit, etc, etc.
This post was edited on 11/22/17 at 7:57 am
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171037 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Are all the patients and patient’s family members required to get a flu shot before they walk into that healthcare facility?


I don’t think they’re walking around from room to room checking on each patient
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72118 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:57 am to
quote:

B/c people are a lot unhealthier now.
Ding ding ding.

LINK

quote:

One of the most striking health-related trends in the United States over the past 50 years has been the rise of obesity. As can be seen in Figure 3-1, in 1960–1962 only 10.7 percent of adult males and 15.8 percent of adult females in the country were obese. By 2007-2008, those numbers had risen to 32.2 and 35.5 percent, respectively. For both sexes, the growth in obesity was relatively slow in the 1960s and 1970s, increased sharply in the 1980s and 1990s, and then slowed in recent years.
quote:

The same pattern has played out in most other high-income countries, including those studied here, but it has generally been less pronounced than in the United States.
quote:

Numerous studies have documented the ways in which being overweight or obese damages health. The most common effects include diabetes; high blood pressure; heart disease; gallstones; and certain cancers, such as colorectal cancer, breast cancer in women, endometrial cancer, and cancers of the kidney, pancreas, liver, and gallbladder (Hu, 2008). Type 2 diabetes is particularly sensitive to body weight. It is very rare in people of normal weight, and the risk for developing it increases rapidly with increasing BMI. The risks of developing high blood pressure, coronary heart disease, and gallstones also grow as BMI increases, as do the risks for the various obesity-related cancers, but none of these conditions is as sensitive to BMI as diabetes (Hu, 2008).
quote:

Alley and colleagues surveyed the body of research on weight and mortality and drew some general conclusions (Alley et al., 2010). First, in the general population, Class 1 obesity is correlated with a small increase in overall mortality, and the higher the BMI, the greater is the elevation. Generally speaking, falling in the overweight category (BMI between 25 and 30) does not increase one's chances of dying from all causes, although being overweight is associated with a slightly increased risk of dying from coronary heart disease. Again, the higher the BMI, the greater is the mortality risk. According to one international study, each increase of 5 units in BMI results in a 30 percent increase in overall mortality (Prospective Studies Collaboration, 2009). In short, the authors concluded, obesity does increase mortality risk; the increase is relatively modest for Class 1 obesity (BMI between 30 and 35) but is significantly greater for those with a BMI above 40. The authors also found that the relationship between BMI and mortality risk changes with age. BMI has its largest effect on the risk of mortality for adults under 50, and the correlation between BMI and mortality decreases beyond that age. The older adults at greatest risk of dying are those at the extreme ends of the BMI spectrum—either extremely underweight or extremely overweight. Thus at older ages, the curve relating mortality risk to BMI changes in shape from a J to a U.
quote:

Since life expectancy at age 50 in the United States would increase significantly more than in other countries through the hypothetical elimination of obesity, the U.S. longevity shortfall would be reduced and in some cases eliminated. U.S. life expectancy for women is 1.37 years lower than the mean in 12 other countries with higher life expectancies. Based on the PSC risk factors, U.S. female life expectancy would be an estimated 0.80 years lower than this mean without obesity, so that obesity would account for an average of 41 percent of the gap. For men, the equivalent percentage of the difference in life expectancy accounted for by obesity, relative to 10 countries with higher life expectancies, is 67 percent.
quote:

Even using the sets of lower obesity risks, however, it appears that differences in obesity account for a fifth to a third of the shortfall in life expectancy in the United States relative to other countries. Obesity appears to be an important part of the explanation of the current U.S. shortfall in life expectancy, but uncertainty remains as to its role in explaining the divergence.

And that is just one piece of the pie.

The US population is fricking awful health-wise.

We have the fattest poor people in the history of humanity.
This post was edited on 11/22/17 at 8:00 am
Posted by DBU
Member since Mar 2014
19059 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:57 am to
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131390 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 8:02 am to
Has this clown not been banished to the SECrant where he belongs?
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 8:02 am to
Good.

That is techinically biological warfare if they remained, un inoculated.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram