Started By
Message

re: 4th grade question has us stumped!

Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:56 pm to
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15597 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

My first reaction was to find a pattern out of the series that would give me something other than 4.5. I couldn't do it. Then comes the confusion.


Then, you need to work on your pattern detection, pal. There are two alternatives in this thread to the 4.5, Neanderthal divide by two answer. One is on the previous page. Here is the other:

LINK
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 9:58 pm
Posted by flvelo12
Palm Harbor, Florida
Member since Jan 2012
3550 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:57 pm to
As stated earlier -
quote:

Divide 36 by 2, then by 4, then by 6. Seems to work, no?

This seems to work also to generate the 6. Or am I missing something?
Posted by Smalls
Southern California
Member since Jul 2009
10294 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Neanderthal divide by two answer



Dude, it's intended for fourth graders.
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
12549 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Divide 36 by 2, then by 4, then by 6. Seems to work, no?

quote:

i thought the factors of 8 were:
2 x 4
2 x (2x2)

to the largest factor of 8, once factored out is 2.

2-2=0, I put down 0 at the thousands position.


60,782
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15597 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

This seems to work also to generate the 6. Or am I missing something?


You are missing the extra math chromosome of the tigerdroppings math elite.
Posted by flvelo12
Palm Harbor, Florida
Member since Jan 2012
3550 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Dude, it's intended for fourth graders.

Hell, some of the stuff my 5th grader brings home kills me. And I don't believe I'm THAT dense.
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15597 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Dude, it's intended for fourth graders.


So... The OT is comprised of fourth graders. Got it.


Divide that by two.
Posted by Bloodworth
North Ga
Member since Oct 2007
4235 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Divide 36 by 2, then by 4, then by 6. Seems to work, no?


Yes... spot on according to the math whiz here in this house.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
68930 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:03 pm to
I won't be able to sleep tonight with anticipation of tomorrow's correct answer bump.
Posted by flvelo12
Palm Harbor, Florida
Member since Jan 2012
3550 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

You are missing the extra math chromosome of the tigerdroppings math elite.

touché
Posted by Bloodworth
North Ga
Member since Oct 2007
4235 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

I won't be able to sleep tonight with anticipation of tomorrow's correct answer bump.


I know right?
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

6--4th multiple of 2 is 6 not 8 (0,2,4,6)


Fun and perhaps sad fact: While this is technically true, there is a high chance that the 4th grader was taught that 0 is not a multiple.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

According to my 7th grade daughter ... well...I'll let her explain why she thinks the answer is 6.

I think the number in the ten thousands place should be 6. The pattern's first number is 36, so the numbers following decrease, because you cannot go beyond 36. 36 divided by 2 is 18. 36 divided by 4 is 9. 36 divided by 6 is 6. 36 divided by 8 is 4.5, etc. The pattern is a dividing pattern, and you multiply the original divisor by 2 each time you continue the pattern. Because the number you are finding is third after 36, you divide 36 by 6, because you multiply the original divisor (2) by 3 and divide that by 36.


Smart daughter, but if that's the answer, it's unsettling. Most of us were assuming the pattern is infinite in either direction.
Posted by LSUTigerDoc
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2008
585 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

quote:
Divide 36 by 2, then by 4, then by 6. Seems to work, no?



I like this idea, but I like to be able to predict what the next number in a sequence would be in either direction. If the next number in the sequence is 6, what's the number that comes before 36?

Fwiw, I believe for a fourth grader, the answer is 4.5.
Posted by MaroonWhite
48 61 69 6c 20 53 74 61 74 65 21
Member since Oct 2012
3739 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Most of us were assuming the pattern is infinite in either direction.


This. A true mathematical pattern should be repeatable in either direction.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25424 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

Most of us were assuming the pattern is infinite in either direction.


It's counter intuitive but whatever. It's the only conclusion that makes sense in the framework.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
15790 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:25 pm to
56.781. Rounded the 4.5 up cause it was a stupid frickin question.
Posted by SPE UVA
Charlottesville VA
Member since May 2009
127 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:27 pm to
it is 4, the pattern is six multiplied by a number that keep getting halved.

36 (6x6)
18 (6x3)
9 (6x1.5)
4 (6x.75)
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
86331 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

And I am honestly unsure if you would consider 8 a factor of 8.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
68930 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:32 pm to
Not one of my finer moments. Get off my arse.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram