- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:32 pm to sand mountainDvalues
Labs not on state electronic reporting systems are only required to report positive cases immediately.
Therefore, negatives are not reported as quickly.
This kind of stuff is probably happening all over.
Therefore, negatives are not reported as quickly.
This kind of stuff is probably happening all over.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:33 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
The original tweeter admits that he is misrepresenting the numbers
Gotcha, doctoring positive result percentages up is one thing, announcing 100% positive in an entire state is pretty bold.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:33 pm to Sasquatch Smash
quote:
This kind of stuff is probably happening all over.
People not reading the numbers correctly and feeding into their own conspiracy theories? Yep.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:34 pm to BuckyCheese
I agree, I'm just saying how it is. It's irrelevant when looking at the overall death rate but misleading when looking at a day/week/month set.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:36 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
People not reading the numbers correctly and feeding into their own conspiracy theories? Yep.
No, labs not fully reporting all their tests.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:37 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
The original tweeter admits that he is misrepresenting the numbers
His original tweet was wrong, but he is still on the right track. All of those testing sites have only submitted their positive results. They are 100% positive on results. So the amount of positive cases is the same, but the amount of tests give is incorrect as there should be a lot more negative results.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:43 pm to baldona
What’s the timeframe for reporting negative results? They aren’t going to get around to reporting those until the backlog of tests can be processed.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:49 pm to sand mountainDvalues
I own a clinical lab operating on the gulf coast. If this is true, this is a massive CLIA violation and will be cause for immediate shut down.
I've had a few "site visits" to run through test procedures and results over the last three months. All glowing remarks. These guys can get fricked if they are doing this.
I've had a few "site visits" to run through test procedures and results over the last three months. All glowing remarks. These guys can get fricked if they are doing this.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:51 pm to Ghost of Colby
quote:
What’s the timeframe for reporting negative results? They aren’t going to get around to reporting those until the backlog of tests can be processed.
Shouldn't all results be reported on the same time frame? Seeing that people's lives and livelihoods are at stake?
Reporting should be as accurate as possible seeing the decisions that are being made using said reports.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:54 pm to tgrgrd00
State health boards have different reporting policies. We report weekly because its easier to keep up with our current work flow.
I've spoken with CLIA directors in the few states we operate in and they are all pretty infuriated with the lack of "timely" reporting. Some labs are reporting monthly numbers two-three weeks in arrears.
I've spoken with CLIA directors in the few states we operate in and they are all pretty infuriated with the lack of "timely" reporting. Some labs are reporting monthly numbers two-three weeks in arrears.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:54 pm to sand mountainDvalues
Everyone will get it eventually. No big deal
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:55 pm to sand mountainDvalues
My mother took a test and tested positive with zero symptoms. I for one think they were just pumping numbers
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:55 pm to baldona
quote:
All of those testing sites have only submitted their positive results.
What if they only have positive results?
We have no idea what kind of labs those are or who they are testing.
I'm not saying they are hiding negatives, but you made up a theory based on assumptions.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:56 pm to LoneStar23
quote:
I for one think they were just pumping numbers
So you think it is deadlier than the current CFR?
Posted on 7/12/20 at 5:59 pm to Sasquatch Smash
quote:
Labs not on state electronic reporting systems are only required to report positive cases immediately.
Therefore, negatives are not reported as quickly.
This kind of stuff is probably happening all over.
So cases are submitted one at a time as opposed to labs reporting their tally of total tests and results each morning?
Posted on 7/12/20 at 6:02 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
So you think it is deadlier than the current CFR
No I think it’s all about milking as many federal dollars as possible
Posted on 7/12/20 at 6:04 pm to sand mountainDvalues
with 60 % accuracy for the test
Posted on 7/12/20 at 6:07 pm to LoneStar23
quote:
No I think it’s all about milking as many federal dollars as possible
You can't have it both ways. Either the numbers are pumped up or more people are dying from fewer cases.
And before you say it isn't real, the rest of the world is in on it. Including North Korea.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 6:07 pm to Sasquatch Smash
This isn't true. There are a number of current state health boards that setup separate COVID-19 reporting centers that don't have electronic reporting. Specifically 2 states along the gulf coast that have a fax number you send in results.
Results have # positives and total # tested under the same reporting period. People are obviously manipulating the # tested which will be exposed during CLIA evaluations once this all calms down.
Results have # positives and total # tested under the same reporting period. People are obviously manipulating the # tested which will be exposed during CLIA evaluations once this all calms down.
Popular
Back to top



0








