Started By
Message

re: 10% ethanol gas vs non ethanol gas. Any harm in using pure gas?

Posted on 6/4/16 at 9:01 am to
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
82363 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 9:01 am to
It's more like 10% difference. I already get 30 mpg so it's not really worth the extra cost.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13762 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 9:07 am to
One time I flew into Iowa and rented a Suburban. It was full of 85% ethanol gas, because there were all these corn ethanol plants in Iowa and that's what they were promoting.

Anyhow, I never looked at the gas gauge. Drove 200 miles down the interstate and ran out of gas. Couldn't freaking believe it. That's how far a Suburban goes on a tank of ethanol.

Never again.
Posted by achenator
Member since Oct 2014
3332 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 9:09 am to
7 mpg lol. So you're telling us that you took out a fuel that is only 30% less efficient than gas that only takes up 10% of the micx and your car is now getting 25% better mileage overall? Even my SLU education knows that those #s don't work.
Posted by achenator
Member since Oct 2014
3332 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 9:28 am to
quote:

One time I flew into Iowa and rented a Suburban. It was full of 85% ethanol gas, because there were all these corn ethanol plants in Iowa and that's what they were promoting.

Anyhow, I never looked at the gas gauge. Drove 200 miles down the interstate and ran out of gas. Couldn't freaking believe it. That's how far a Suburban goes on a tank of ethanol.

Never again.

yes it's about 30% less efficient than gas. SO 30% less mileage. The only way it works economically is that is needs to be at least 30% cheaper than gas, which it usually is not. The people I know that run it have performance cars that are set up and tuned for it. It's a wonderful cheap race fuel.
Posted by Hogwarts
Arkansas, USA
Member since Sep 2015
18395 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 9:30 am to
OP must have caught a tail wind. Only logical conclusion.
Posted by jorconalx
alexandria
Member since Aug 2011
11303 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 9:34 am to
quote:

seeinspots


Is a dummy
Posted by NewIberiaHaircut
Lafayette
Member since May 2013
12542 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 9:40 am to
I get non ethanol gas whenever I can for my car. I never put ethanol gas in my boat or lawn equipment. There is a definite difference is gas mileage with my car. Sometime upwards of 4mpg.
Posted by Rust Cohle
Baton rouge
Member since Mar 2014
2167 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 9:59 am to
Ethanol gives you less mpg but is equally cheaper. But also gives you more horsepower. I think it burns cooler?
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
48586 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Ethanol gives you less mpg

Yes
quote:

but is equally cheaper

Only if government subsidized
quote:

But also gives you more horsepower

False, lower BTUs means lower available power
quote:

I think it burns cooler?

Yes
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
48586 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 11:03 am to
quote:

I think the 7mpg claim is not legit.

I agree
quote:

Can anyone really claim that ethanol is destroying their engines?

Probably not, depending on what precisely what you mean by this, but it does cause some problems.
quote:

Most engine problems I believe are from neglectful owners not doing basic maintenance on boats and cars

This is true as far as it goes. But ethanol presents problems specifically for certain soft materials (rubber, vinyl, etc). Hence there is a need to use slightly more expensive gasket materials and hoses and they tend to break down quicker, even still. Additionally, hoses tend to break down in a manner that can cause issues with ports, valves, etc. via the emulsion that is sometimes created by material dissolved off the insides of the hoses.

Of course many, if not most, of those problems are on older engines. Newer engines have soft parts that are more alcohol tolerant. But Many of the components that work well with alcohol do not work well with gasoline and vice versa.

quote:

And with boats most problems are lack of use and not ethanol.


Again, true as far as it goes but the boat industry was particularly slow in addressing the issues related to alcohol and hoses/soft parts.

That's my take on it.
Posted by weadjust
Member since Aug 2012
15816 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Same driving habits(cruise set at 75)


There's your problem. 100 mph+ would have gotten some really good MPG
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Any harm in using pure gas?



what the frick did I just read?
Posted by tigeroarz1
Winston-Salem, NC
Member since Oct 2013
3932 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 4:11 pm to
The 10% ethanol screws up small engines like lawn mowers and weed eaters.
Posted by 82fumanchu
Saskatchewan
Member since Jan 2014
2004 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 5:01 pm to

quote:

100 mph+

I'm surprised this almost made it to page 3 without mention.
Posted by 82fumanchu
Saskatchewan
Member since Jan 2014
2004 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 5:01 pm to
DP
This post was edited on 6/4/16 at 5:01 pm
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36494 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

False, lower BTUs means lower available power


Not exactly. It depends on how efficient the engine is as well. An ethanol rich fuel has a higher octane number and thus can be used in engines with a higher compression ratio and extract more energy from this less energy dense fuel.

That being said, E10 aint going to make a difference and you need an engine designed to take advantage of ethanol's properties if using a high ethanol fuel. An engine and gaskets and tubing that won't corrode.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

Use it when you can get it. No harm at all. In fact, it is better for your car.


This is the correct answer.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184515 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

fricking ethanol is the biggest con job ever.

Burning food for shitty fuel. Made the price of umpteen other food goods from meat to meal go up in price.

frick big corn.




Not to mention that ethanol attracts water from air and we all know how much a fuel system loves having water in it. Combustion and water get along so well.

video
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
48586 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

Not exactly. It depends on how efficient the engine is as well.


The assumption is we were talking about similar octane ratings for the same engine. But you hit on a good point regarding power efficiency, all else being equal, higher compression ratio will produce higher power efficiency. That should, theoretically, lead to higher fuel efficiency. Higher compression is the only way to increase the efficiency of the Otto cyle (not the engine as a whole but the efficiency of the thermodynamic power cycle).

And in terms of thermodynamics, lower BTU content always equals lower available power.
This post was edited on 6/4/16 at 5:37 pm
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
48586 posts
Posted on 6/4/16 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Not to mention that ethanol attracts water from air


Alcohol and water have an affinity for each other, in chemical terms, but one does not "attract" the other. The demo is specific to vented systems and is really kind of a poor representation of even that since you tank would have to have a vent opening equal to at least 80% of the size of the tank to simulate the exposure area presented in the jar. Auto fuel systems are non vented and the vapor pressure of the gasoline will typically mean the tank is primarily filled with gasoline fumes, not air.

quote:

Combustion and water get along so well


Combustion produces water and alcohol mixed with water burns fairly well. It's still not a good idea to add water before the combustion occurs but it is not incredibly damaging in small quantities and sometimes has benefits, though rarely enough to offset potential damage (as I said, not a great idea).

In boats, though, I highly recommend using straight gasoline if it's available.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram