Started By
Message
locked post

Would you realign the NFL into Eastern & Western Conferences? Would it help Saints?

Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:48 am
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
9836 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:48 am
I think it would be interesting to realign the NFL into a Western Conference and an Eastern Conference like the NBA & the NHL.
Perhaps it would make sense both geographically and economically by reducing expenses due to long travel times? Maybe it would also conserve time for additional practice & rest during the season because of the reduced travel time?

Western Conference:

Seattle Seahawks, San Francisco 49ers, Los Angeles Rams, Los Angeles Chargers, Arizona Cardinals, Las Vegas Raiders, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Dallas Cowboys, Houston Texans, Minnesota Vikings, Chicago Bears, New Orleans Saints, Green Bay Packers, Tennessee Titans, and Indianapolis Colts

Eastern Conference:

Detroit Lions, Cleveland Browns, Cincinnati Bengals, Pittsburgh Steelers, Philadelphia Eagles, New York Giants, New York Jets, Buffalo Bills, New England Patriots, Baltimore Ravens, Washington Commanders, Carolina Panthers, Atlanta Falcons, Jacksonville Jaguars, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and Miami Dolphins

Would you be in favor of this or against it? Would it benefit or harm the Saints?


This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 10:20 am
Posted by Spelt it rong
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
10760 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:01 am to
All I know is I don't like how the divisions are made. Let's do North vs South like the good ole days.
Posted by metallica81788
NO
Member since Sep 2008
10071 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:20 am to
In favor of scheduling and dividing teams to reduce travel
All the rivalries and most divisions could still be left intact
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
9836 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:21 am to
One potential weakness I can see with this alignment is the fact that the Western Conference teams would be way more spread out than the Eastern Conference teams, and so the Western Conference teams might not actually see many benefits in terms of reduced travel time and expenses.
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 10:23 am
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
15911 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:27 am to
Would be interesting but unless it make the NFL richer don’t expect them to ever consider it.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20812 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:27 am to
Only real realignment solution
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
35471 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:30 am to
I don't know when they're going to do it, but since the league is all about creating more revenue venue at some point they're going to go to 18 games.

When they do that I think it would be cool if NFC teams played only other NFC teams like an all-conference type of season, you still get to play your division opponents twice.

Kind of do it like they used to do in the old days.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
9836 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:38 am to
This is how I would envision the divisions shaking out:

Western Conference

Division 1: Seattle Seahawks, San Francisco 49ers, Los Angeles Rams, Los Angeles Chargers

Division 2: Arizona Cardinals, Las Vegas Raiders, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs

Division 3: New Orleans Saints, Houston Texans, Dallas Cowboys, Tennessee Titans

Division 4: Minnesota Vikings, Green Bay Packers, Chicago Bears, Indianapolis Colts


Eastern Conference

Division 1: New England Patriots, Buffalo Bills, New York Jets, New York Giants

Division 2: Detroit Lions, Cleveland Browns, Cincinnati Bengals, Pittsburgh Steelers

Division 3: Philadelphia Eagles, Baltimore Ravens, Washington Commanders, Carolina Panthers

Division 4: Atlanta Falcons, Jacksonville Jaguars, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20812 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:39 am to
I always thought the best approach for scheduling would be to have all cross-conference games the first 4 (now 5) weeks of the season. Then you have the first 3 division games. Bye weeks would take place between weeks 9-15 (used to be 8-14), and you finish the year with the final 3 division games.

Posted by Borntoboogy
Member since Jan 2023
1070 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:05 am to
It's a giant .....
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
71027 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:01 pm to
Man that west coast/Rocky Mountain region is SOLID.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
7499 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:14 pm to
Maybe the Sun Belt conference.
Posted by Yippie_Ky_yae
Member since Jun 2019
4572 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:37 pm to
A lot of male parts on that map
Posted by hottub
Member since Dec 2012
3652 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:52 pm to
Jerry would never let this happen.

Dem Boys play in the largest TV markets at least 3 times/year.
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 12:53 pm
Posted by TigerSaurus
Member since Apr 2024
2539 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 1:37 pm to

Alignment of teams and conferences/ divisions, for the most part, really don’t matter.

You need to build a team that can compete to win the championship by beating ANY and ALL Teams in the League.
Posted by southsidedell
Tampa, FL
Member since Dec 2016
5545 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 1:54 pm to
I think there is too many teams now to just split them between two divisions though...
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
9836 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

You need to build a team that can compete to win the championship by beating ANY and ALL Teams in the League.


Thanks once again, Captain Obvious!!

So we’re supposed to be trying to build a good team that can beat the other teams in the league?!?!

Wow, I was taking the wrong approach completely!
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted by TigerSaurus
Member since Apr 2024
2539 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 3:01 pm to


Did your mother have any children that lived ??
Posted by thejuiceisloose
Member since Nov 2018
6098 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 4:16 pm to
True it does not make any sense that the Colts are in the AFC South
Posted by BRich
Old Metairie
Member since Aug 2017
2766 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 5:13 pm to
It's all about television, which made the league what it is today.

The non-geographic conferences, of course, go back to the days immediately after the merger, with the AFC being the old AFL (plus three teams from the old NFL) and the NFC being all but three teams from the old NFL.

For a long time, it worked because there was basically two TV contracts, one aligned to the AFC and one to the NFC. Each network would show all away games for a team's market (as well as home games if they were sold out). Back when I was growing up, CBS had the NFC contract, NBC had the AFC contract-- and ABC had Monday Night Football. So the Saints were on CBS for all Sunday away games.

You had a pretty good breakdown in markets and states, evenly balanced between the two national network TV deals-- NYC had teams in each conference, as did the Bay Area at first, then Los Angeles ( NYC and LA being the two biggest TV markets). Texas was split between the Cowboys (NFC) and Oilers (NFC), as were states like Missouri, Florida and Pennsylvania.

Nowadays, they've added networks like Fox, ESPN, and the NFL Network to the mix, and have Thursday night and Sunday night games, as well as Thanksgiving NIGHT games. It's a lot more fragmented, but the basic reasoning and premise for two non-geographic conferences still holds true. It's all about the TV money.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram