- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Would you realign the NFL into Eastern & Western Conferences? Would it help Saints?
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:48 am
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:48 am
I think it would be interesting to realign the NFL into a Western Conference and an Eastern Conference like the NBA & the NHL.
Perhaps it would make sense both geographically and economically by reducing expenses due to long travel times? Maybe it would also conserve time for additional practice & rest during the season because of the reduced travel time?
Western Conference:
Seattle Seahawks, San Francisco 49ers, Los Angeles Rams, Los Angeles Chargers, Arizona Cardinals, Las Vegas Raiders, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Dallas Cowboys, Houston Texans, Minnesota Vikings, Chicago Bears, New Orleans Saints, Green Bay Packers, Tennessee Titans, and Indianapolis Colts
Eastern Conference:
Detroit Lions, Cleveland Browns, Cincinnati Bengals, Pittsburgh Steelers, Philadelphia Eagles, New York Giants, New York Jets, Buffalo Bills, New England Patriots, Baltimore Ravens, Washington Commanders, Carolina Panthers, Atlanta Falcons, Jacksonville Jaguars, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and Miami Dolphins
Would you be in favor of this or against it? Would it benefit or harm the Saints?
Perhaps it would make sense both geographically and economically by reducing expenses due to long travel times? Maybe it would also conserve time for additional practice & rest during the season because of the reduced travel time?
Western Conference:
Seattle Seahawks, San Francisco 49ers, Los Angeles Rams, Los Angeles Chargers, Arizona Cardinals, Las Vegas Raiders, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Dallas Cowboys, Houston Texans, Minnesota Vikings, Chicago Bears, New Orleans Saints, Green Bay Packers, Tennessee Titans, and Indianapolis Colts
Eastern Conference:
Detroit Lions, Cleveland Browns, Cincinnati Bengals, Pittsburgh Steelers, Philadelphia Eagles, New York Giants, New York Jets, Buffalo Bills, New England Patriots, Baltimore Ravens, Washington Commanders, Carolina Panthers, Atlanta Falcons, Jacksonville Jaguars, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and Miami Dolphins
Would you be in favor of this or against it? Would it benefit or harm the Saints?
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 10:20 am
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:01 am to cbree88
All I know is I don't like how the divisions are made. Let's do North vs South like the good ole days.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:20 am to cbree88
In favor of scheduling and dividing teams to reduce travel
All the rivalries and most divisions could still be left intact
All the rivalries and most divisions could still be left intact
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:21 am to Spelt it rong
One potential weakness I can see with this alignment is the fact that the Western Conference teams would be way more spread out than the Eastern Conference teams, and so the Western Conference teams might not actually see many benefits in terms of reduced travel time and expenses.
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 10:23 am
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:27 am to cbree88
Would be interesting but unless it make the NFL richer don’t expect them to ever consider it.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:27 am to cbree88
Only real realignment solution

Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:30 am to cbree88
I don't know when they're going to do it, but since the league is all about creating more revenue venue at some point they're going to go to 18 games.
When they do that I think it would be cool if NFC teams played only other NFC teams like an all-conference type of season, you still get to play your division opponents twice.
Kind of do it like they used to do in the old days.
When they do that I think it would be cool if NFC teams played only other NFC teams like an all-conference type of season, you still get to play your division opponents twice.
Kind of do it like they used to do in the old days.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:38 am to metallica81788
This is how I would envision the divisions shaking out:
Western Conference
Division 1: Seattle Seahawks, San Francisco 49ers, Los Angeles Rams, Los Angeles Chargers
Division 2: Arizona Cardinals, Las Vegas Raiders, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs
Division 3: New Orleans Saints, Houston Texans, Dallas Cowboys, Tennessee Titans
Division 4: Minnesota Vikings, Green Bay Packers, Chicago Bears, Indianapolis Colts
Eastern Conference
Division 1: New England Patriots, Buffalo Bills, New York Jets, New York Giants
Division 2: Detroit Lions, Cleveland Browns, Cincinnati Bengals, Pittsburgh Steelers
Division 3: Philadelphia Eagles, Baltimore Ravens, Washington Commanders, Carolina Panthers
Division 4: Atlanta Falcons, Jacksonville Jaguars, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins
Western Conference
Division 1: Seattle Seahawks, San Francisco 49ers, Los Angeles Rams, Los Angeles Chargers
Division 2: Arizona Cardinals, Las Vegas Raiders, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs
Division 3: New Orleans Saints, Houston Texans, Dallas Cowboys, Tennessee Titans
Division 4: Minnesota Vikings, Green Bay Packers, Chicago Bears, Indianapolis Colts
Eastern Conference
Division 1: New England Patriots, Buffalo Bills, New York Jets, New York Giants
Division 2: Detroit Lions, Cleveland Browns, Cincinnati Bengals, Pittsburgh Steelers
Division 3: Philadelphia Eagles, Baltimore Ravens, Washington Commanders, Carolina Panthers
Division 4: Atlanta Falcons, Jacksonville Jaguars, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:39 am to LooseCannon22282
I always thought the best approach for scheduling would be to have all cross-conference games the first 4 (now 5) weeks of the season. Then you have the first 3 division games. Bye weeks would take place between weeks 9-15 (used to be 8-14), and you finish the year with the final 3 division games.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:05 am to Weekend Warrior79
It's a giant .....
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:01 pm to Weekend Warrior79
Man that west coast/Rocky Mountain region is SOLID.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:14 pm to cbree88
Maybe the Sun Belt conference.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:37 pm to Weekend Warrior79
A lot of male parts on that map
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:52 pm to Weekend Warrior79
Jerry would never let this happen.
Dem Boys play in the largest TV markets at least 3 times/year.
Dem Boys play in the largest TV markets at least 3 times/year.
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 5/30/25 at 1:37 pm to cbree88
Alignment of teams and conferences/ divisions, for the most part, really don’t matter.
You need to build a team that can compete to win the championship by beating ANY and ALL Teams in the League.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 1:54 pm to Spelt it rong
I think there is too many teams now to just split them between two divisions though...
Posted on 5/30/25 at 2:52 pm to TigerSaurus
quote:
You need to build a team that can compete to win the championship by beating ANY and ALL Teams in the League.
Thanks once again, Captain Obvious!!
So we’re supposed to be trying to build a good team that can beat the other teams in the league?!?!
Wow, I was taking the wrong approach completely!
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 5/30/25 at 3:01 pm to cbree88
Did your mother have any children that lived ??
Posted on 5/30/25 at 4:16 pm to cbree88
True it does not make any sense that the Colts are in the AFC South
Posted on 5/30/25 at 5:13 pm to cbree88
It's all about television, which made the league what it is today.
The non-geographic conferences, of course, go back to the days immediately after the merger, with the AFC being the old AFL (plus three teams from the old NFL) and the NFC being all but three teams from the old NFL.
For a long time, it worked because there was basically two TV contracts, one aligned to the AFC and one to the NFC. Each network would show all away games for a team's market (as well as home games if they were sold out). Back when I was growing up, CBS had the NFC contract, NBC had the AFC contract-- and ABC had Monday Night Football. So the Saints were on CBS for all Sunday away games.
You had a pretty good breakdown in markets and states, evenly balanced between the two national network TV deals-- NYC had teams in each conference, as did the Bay Area at first, then Los Angeles ( NYC and LA being the two biggest TV markets). Texas was split between the Cowboys (NFC) and Oilers (NFC), as were states like Missouri, Florida and Pennsylvania.
Nowadays, they've added networks like Fox, ESPN, and the NFL Network to the mix, and have Thursday night and Sunday night games, as well as Thanksgiving NIGHT games. It's a lot more fragmented, but the basic reasoning and premise for two non-geographic conferences still holds true. It's all about the TV money.
The non-geographic conferences, of course, go back to the days immediately after the merger, with the AFC being the old AFL (plus three teams from the old NFL) and the NFC being all but three teams from the old NFL.
For a long time, it worked because there was basically two TV contracts, one aligned to the AFC and one to the NFC. Each network would show all away games for a team's market (as well as home games if they were sold out). Back when I was growing up, CBS had the NFC contract, NBC had the AFC contract-- and ABC had Monday Night Football. So the Saints were on CBS for all Sunday away games.
You had a pretty good breakdown in markets and states, evenly balanced between the two national network TV deals-- NYC had teams in each conference, as did the Bay Area at first, then Los Angeles ( NYC and LA being the two biggest TV markets). Texas was split between the Cowboys (NFC) and Oilers (NFC), as were states like Missouri, Florida and Pennsylvania.
Nowadays, they've added networks like Fox, ESPN, and the NFL Network to the mix, and have Thursday night and Sunday night games, as well as Thanksgiving NIGHT games. It's a lot more fragmented, but the basic reasoning and premise for two non-geographic conferences still holds true. It's all about the TV money.
Popular
Back to top

12








