- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would Rizzi Be Considered a Lazy Hire
Posted on 11/14/24 at 12:08 pm to purplepylon
Posted on 11/14/24 at 12:08 pm to purplepylon
quote:
Saints have a 2-3 year rebuild.
quote:
No coach worth anything will come here knowing what's in store.
Jimmy Johnson:
1989 DAL (NFL) 1-15
1990 DAL (NFL) 7-9
1991 DAL (NFL) 11-5
1992 DAL (NFL) 13-3 Superbowl Winner
1993 DAL (NFL) 12-4 Superbowl Winner
1
Posted on 11/14/24 at 12:16 pm to Scientific73
he's not the long term answer no matter how many more they win
the schedule eases up quite a bit so the Saints will likely win some games down the stretch
knowing Loomis he will hire him and Saints will be back on the market sooner then later
the schedule eases up quite a bit so the Saints will likely win some games down the stretch
knowing Loomis he will hire him and Saints will be back on the market sooner then later
This post was edited on 11/14/24 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 11/14/24 at 12:17 pm to Scientific73
Too many factors before we could say.
Allen was considered a lazy hire because they did a half arse search and hired someone with a career .222 winning percentage.
If Rizzi wins most of the games in the schedule and they actual interview legitimate options, then offer him the job I think the worst we can say is it was a comfortable hire.
If he finished under .500 with the remaining schedule and still gets the job; it’s a lazy hire. Side note, if he wins 1 of the last 7 games of the season, he’ll at least have a better winning percentage than what DA had when he was offered the job.
Allen was considered a lazy hire because they did a half arse search and hired someone with a career .222 winning percentage.
If Rizzi wins most of the games in the schedule and they actual interview legitimate options, then offer him the job I think the worst we can say is it was a comfortable hire.
If he finished under .500 with the remaining schedule and still gets the job; it’s a lazy hire. Side note, if he wins 1 of the last 7 games of the season, he’ll at least have a better winning percentage than what DA had when he was offered the job.
This post was edited on 11/14/24 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 11/14/24 at 12:52 pm to Scientific73
As a lifelong Saints fan- it would be a 10/10 on the disappointment scale for me.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:02 pm to Scientific73
Of course and rightfully so.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:03 pm to Scientific73
Yes, it would be a total disaster. Which means the Saints will likely do it.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 3:19 pm to Scientific73
I would have said absolutely not but it does look like the players do respond to him. A poor man’s Dan Campbell maybe? See how it plays out
Posted on 11/14/24 at 8:51 pm to Scientific73
I don’t care how he does for the rest of the season, we would be fools to not have a proper coaching search.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 8:53 pm to BigTigerJoe
quote:
Jimmy Johnson
Sean Payton took over the 3-13 Katrina Saints and took them to the NFC championship game in one year.
frick the cowboys
Posted on 11/14/24 at 8:54 pm to MONROE
quote:
He barely won one game against the damn Falcons and they put up almost 500 yards. Pump the brakes.
People were saying Kubiak was going to be the next head coach after the first game.....
Posted on 11/14/24 at 8:55 pm to dupergreenie
quote:
People were saying Kubiak was going to be the next head coach after the first game.....
Whoa whoa whoa man…..that was after the second game
Posted on 11/14/24 at 8:57 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
shite you are right. I am most disappoint in myself.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 9:04 pm to Scientific73
Oh Mickey.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 10:48 pm to goatmilker
Unless we win the superbowl we need to a legit coaches search and move on from Loomis
Posted on 11/15/24 at 12:24 am to Scientific73
Yes
Posted on 11/15/24 at 12:44 am to Scientific73
You should contact loomis and let him know
421-1781
421-1781
Posted on 11/15/24 at 1:24 am to Scientific73
Lazy? Maybe
Pathetic - Definitely!!
Do we not have any standards????
Why are our fans so simple?
Pathetic - Definitely!!
Do we not have any standards????
Why are our fans so simple?
Posted on 11/15/24 at 9:21 am to Scientific73
He would need to win out to be the selection.
Posted on 11/15/24 at 9:42 am to DBG
quote:This. Have Rizzi command the tank for 2 years and just have a whole team on the vet minimum while we shed whatever cap we can. Then start fresh in 2026 or 27 with a top QB pick. All after you fire Loomis into the sun.
Depends on the circumstances. If we dive further into a rebuild, I have zero problem with Rizzi basically being our David Culley.
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:50 pm to Scientific73
Yes, but I think if he does get the job, it would be because he finished the season very strong. He has an 8 game "try out". Say he goes 7-1, I think it would be hard not to give him the job and most Saints fans would be OK with it, although I really think 4-4 is a more realistic run, which would take him out of the running anyway.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News