Started By
Message

re: Would Ingram be a good pick if still available for saints?

Posted on 4/15/11 at 5:07 pm to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/15/11 at 5:07 pm to
if they pass on him because of the knee thats their bad. draft focuses too much on value. if u think you have an impact runningback (not many in the league) you draft them round 1
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile, AL.
Member since May 2008
35375 posts
Posted on 4/15/11 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

I think he might be a good choice, if not who you got depending on availability??


First off, I like Ingram, he has the right kind of atttitude and has the ability to do well in the pros. I just can't say he would be the best choice at #24. We have not made a splash on the defensive line in the draft since picking Ellis. IMO a guy like Wilkerson who could play DT or DE would be the way to go.
This post was edited on 4/15/11 at 10:27 pm
Posted by blueslover
deeper than deep south
Member since Sep 2007
22792 posts
Posted on 4/15/11 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

if they pass on him because of the knee thats their bad.


so if a guy has a physical issue you think will be a problem and might derail or shorten his career it's a good thing to take him early?

quote:

draft focuses too much on value

So what should it focus on? You're an advocate of need over value? We might not have any starting strong safety if Harper bolts. So say screw what the boards say we're getting DeAndre McDaniel at 24?

quote:

if u think you have an impact runningback (not many in the league) you draft them round 1

Definition of impact? Arian Foster 1616 yds?-Undrafted. Jammal Charles 1467yds?-3rd Rd. Michael Turner 1371yds? 5th Rd. Ahmad Bradshaw 1235yds? 7th Rd. Peyton Hillis 1177yds? 7th Rd Green-Ellis 1008yds? undrafted. Blount 1007yds? undrafted. Ivory 716yds in 12 games?

If the Saints took him I'd be fine with it though. They should have earned everyone's trust by this time.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61975 posts
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Definition of impact? Arian Foster 1616 yds?-Undrafted. Jammal Charles 1467yds?-3rd Rd. Michael Turner 1371yds? 5th Rd. Ahmad Bradshaw 1235yds? 7th Rd. Peyton Hillis 1177yds? 7th Rd Green-Ellis 1008yds? undrafted. Blount 1007yds? undrafted. Ivory 716yds in 12 games?


For every one of those, there are probably 100 guys drafted who never get an NFL carry. I'm not suggesting drafting Ingram, but I think an 18-20 carry/game Pro-Bowl type RB would make the Saints and infinitely better team. And I would take 3-4 years of that production at #24, even if the guy never played a down after that. The Saints need to take advantage of their window to win championships. If they think a running back could help do that, they should pull the trigger one of these years.
Posted by Smitty55
Rayville
Member since Oct 2009
460 posts
Posted on 4/17/11 at 7:17 pm to
As much of an lsu fan i am, i love and respect mark ingram as a player and a man. But if u havent heard, we have chris ivory returning who is probably at way greater value than mark is right now, we just signed pierre thomas to a 4 yr contract, and the saints front office plust coach sesn psyton hsve said the were working on a deal to keep reggie. so with all of them returning it doesnt make since drafting a RB in the first round when we have serious holes still to feel on defense.if he is the best left on the board so be it. but the front 7 in this yrs draft is so deep i dont see where we would not choose defense in the first three rounds
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 4/17/11 at 7:33 pm to
Need to go Defense with the 1st pick.
Posted by jacks40
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
11877 posts
Posted on 4/17/11 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

. If they think a running back could help do that, they should pull the trigger one of these years.


If they think...as opposed to what not thinking a RB could help and drafting one anyway?

Sure an impact RB would help but so would an impact pass rusher right?

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464971 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 8:08 am to
no
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464971 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 8:10 am to
quote:

stud college backs, are stud NFL backs...

and there will be studs in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rounds

RBs aren't worth much in the NFL b/c there are so damn many of them

plus this RB has a shitty knee
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43482 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 8:28 am to
quote:

As much of an lsu fan i am, i love and respect mark ingram as a player and a man. But if u havent heard, we have chris ivory returning who is probably at way greater value than mark is right now, we just signed pierre thomas to a 4 yr contract, and the saints front office plust coach sesn psyton hsve said the were working on a deal to keep reggie. so with all of them returning it doesnt make since drafting a RB in the first round when we have serious holes still to feel on defense.if he is the best left on the board so be it. but the front 7 in this yrs draft is so deep i dont see where we would not choose defense in the first three rounds


Despite this being hard to read, this man is using real logic here. We have RBs. They are prone to injury, yes, but they aren't turrible. We need a durable bruiser from the 2nd or 3rd round, not an already injured guy from the 1st.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464971 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 8:32 am to
yeah i mean guys like helu or ridley may fall. and i say ridley b/c i know more about him...not b/c he's an LSU guy

ridley may be an option in the 5th or 6th round, for example. that's a better value

hell, take a flyer on graig cooper if he falls to the 4-5 round range. he's not a workhorse but has explosive ability
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43482 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 9:03 am to
quote:

yeah i mean guys like helu or ridley may fall. and i say ridley b/c i know more about him...not b/c he's an LSU guy

ridley may be an option in the 5th or 6th round, for example. that's a better value

hell, take a flyer on graig cooper if he falls to the 4-5 round range. he's not a workhorse but has explosive ability



Right. Besides being an LSU homer, I wouldn't mind getting Ridley in the 4-5 round range. He's not a burner but he's cuts very well and has good vision. He won't WOW you but he is a workhorse back. The problem is we don't have any picks after 3 until round 7 so we'd have to trade down from our 1st pick and pick up maybe a 2, 3 and a couple of later rounds.

We have a 1,2,3,3,7 this year. I'm inclined to think that we'll either give up one of those 3s to pick up later picks (which I doubt) or use a 3rd to pick up a RB. Depending on how Charles Brown is doing, I would draft a strong DE such as Ryan Kerrigan in the 1st, an OT in the 2nd, an OLB in the 3rd, a workhorse RB in the 3rd, and in the 7th.. hell idk, find a diamond in the rough like this organization always does.
This post was edited on 4/18/11 at 9:04 am
Posted by UPT
NOLA
Member since May 2009
5874 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 1:11 pm to
He had his knee scoped. It really isn't that big of an issue.
Posted by jacks40
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
11877 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

He had his knee scoped. It really isn't that big of an issue.


NFL teams with more information and access to his medical records than you or I would seem to differ.

Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

There is no game changing DE that late in the draft


Cameron Heyward and Justin Houston are laughing at this.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
70675 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

if they pass on him because of the knee thats their bad. draft focuses too much on value. if u think you have an impact runningback (not many in the league) you draft them round 1


not many in the league but it isn't a position of extreme value anymore...tell me the last stud superbowl champ running back...no way in hell I spend a first rounder on a guy that is going to get hit 300 times a year
This post was edited on 4/18/11 at 8:30 pm
Posted by Lovethutigahs
New Orleans, La
Member since Apr 2004
945 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 3:06 pm to
Does it REALLY clog up the board. If no one is interested, they won't reply and it'll die out.. If people do reply to it then it wasn't a needless thread. If you are not interested, simply scroll by. Why is that hard to understand?
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23350 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 3:33 pm to
I think it makes more sense picking a RB in the 2nd and 3rd.

I think there is more value to the Saints to draft DL, OL, and LB over RB in the first round.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram