- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which positions are absolute No Go's for you with our 1st pick of draft
Posted on 4/24/19 at 4:37 pm to MorbidTheClown
Posted on 4/24/19 at 4:37 pm to MorbidTheClown
quote:
qb unless on of the top 4-5 are there at 62.
Agree with this. The team won't pick again until late in the 5th, pick 168. I think it puts more pressure on drafting someone that can contribute the 1st year. Even if we draft a position we have great depth (RB, ILB) those positions should see the field from time-to-time and on STs. Back-up QB, P & K only sees the field in worst case scenarios.
1
Posted on 4/24/19 at 4:39 pm to Chad504boy
Cornerback
Posted on 4/24/19 at 6:59 pm to Chad504boy
QB, K, Placeholder
Posted on 4/24/19 at 7:28 pm to Weekend Warrior79
Not happening - FB, P, K, LS
Depth/future starter - QB, RB, TE, LB, CB, S (I almost put Safety in the next category)
Immediate PT (if the player is good enough) available - DL, WR.
Biggest need - OL
Depth/future starter - QB, RB, TE, LB, CB, S (I almost put Safety in the next category)
Immediate PT (if the player is good enough) available - DL, WR.
Biggest need - OL
This post was edited on 4/24/19 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 4/24/19 at 7:55 pm to Chad504boy
picking anything other then offensive line, receiver, or TE would be stupid no matter if it is the best player available.
that "best player available" line is pure BS in most cases when you have positions of need, draft those, or trade back for more picks if you cant justify a player of need just because a guy you dont need is available
that "best player available" line is pure BS in most cases when you have positions of need, draft those, or trade back for more picks if you cant justify a player of need just because a guy you dont need is available
This post was edited on 4/24/19 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 4/24/19 at 8:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
I feel like we actually need a 3rd back a la Mike Bell. Someone to run the clock down when we need to shorten the game. I wouldn't want Kamara in a position like that if the game isn't in doubt.
Posted on 4/24/19 at 8:38 pm to keakar
quote:
that "best player available" line is pure BS
El oh El
Posted on 4/25/19 at 9:17 am to Chad504boy
Punter
RB
LB
DT
DE
Kicker
QB
Everything else is wide open
RB
LB
DT
DE
Kicker
QB
Everything else is wide open
Posted on 4/25/19 at 9:19 am to Chad504boy
If we draft a rb, I will melt beyond melt.
QB, TE, WR, OL all make sense.
DE, DT, DB also make sense.
Linebacker, it better be Devin white falling. Value has to offset
QB, TE, WR, OL all make sense.
DE, DT, DB also make sense.
Linebacker, it better be Devin white falling. Value has to offset
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News