- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where is everyone who wouldn’t take Guice over Ingram now..
Posted on 5/9/18 at 7:32 am to AustinKnight
Posted on 5/9/18 at 7:32 am to AustinKnight
It's 4 games, not 16 games 
0
Posted on 5/9/18 at 8:07 am to AustinKnight
He's right. We could have drafted Guice, let Ingram sit out his suspension, and then trade Ingram to the Chiefs for Kelce.
All. Problems. Solved.
All. Problems. Solved.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 8:18 am to AustinKnight
Right here.
100 downvotes, OP, that's impressive. I'm guessing that really answers your question.
100 downvotes, OP, that's impressive. I'm guessing that really answers your question.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 8:46 am to tigersquad89
quote:
Some teams fans...
Here's is the craziest part. In this loons head we should have taken a RB that everyone passed on in the first round over the DE we took that has one of the highest ceilings of anyone coming out in 2018. For a position where we have the returning rookie of the year because our other pro-bowl back got suspended for the first 4 games.
How you make that leap in logic is astounding.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:46 am to AustinKnight
you cum purple and gold
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:49 am to AustinKnight
Relax big lee
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:01 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
Relax big lee
Too soon?
nope!
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:02 am to GynoSandberg
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:08 am to AustinKnight
Rantards are the worst
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:28 am to Tigers2010
quote:Here
Where is everyone who wouldn’t take Guice over Ingram now..
Look, I was a big Guice fan at LSU. I won't be surprised if he does well in Washington and eventually becomes a starter.
But, team success is about dynamics as much as ability. Don't think Guice fits into what the Saints have here. He doesn't bring the power game that Ingram does. He wouldn't be the big brother to Kamara that Ingram is. And given that there's already been some drama with him before the draft even started, I wouldn't be surprised if he was involved in more as a pro, which is something we don't need.
Good luck to the kid, but I'm good with what we have, even now.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 2:44 pm to AustinKnight
I don't post much here but I came out from lurking just to say you're an idiot and should stop posting. That is all
Posted on 5/10/18 at 11:30 pm to AustinKnight
Guice cannot match Ingram as a receiver in this offense. And then Guice plays are telegraphed.
Its well known that RB’s have to be able to run routes and catch, and learn the offense as a route runner in SP’s offense. We struggle when our RB isnt a threat to run a route out the backfield. Thats why Peterson sucked last year but Kamara/Ingram rolled. And its why Ingram wasnt nearly as good early in his career when he wasnt a good receiver etc. Apart of the issue is that our offense is so intricate.
So Ingram is def > Guice as far as the saints RB needs, for the near future.
Now on another team Guice may be > Ingram.
It’s arguable that Guice could learn to be a better receiver etc. but that would take some time.
Its well known that RB’s have to be able to run routes and catch, and learn the offense as a route runner in SP’s offense. We struggle when our RB isnt a threat to run a route out the backfield. Thats why Peterson sucked last year but Kamara/Ingram rolled. And its why Ingram wasnt nearly as good early in his career when he wasnt a good receiver etc. Apart of the issue is that our offense is so intricate.
So Ingram is def > Guice as far as the saints RB needs, for the near future.
Now on another team Guice may be > Ingram.
It’s arguable that Guice could learn to be a better receiver etc. but that would take some time.
This post was edited on 5/10/18 at 11:43 pm
Posted on 5/11/18 at 6:54 am to AustinKnight
Rain the BOOs onto your soul.
Posted on 5/11/18 at 10:40 am to AustinKnight
Still wouldn't
Posted on 5/11/18 at 11:45 am to AustinKnight
I'd still take a suspended Ingram over that fish faced jack off.
Posted on 5/11/18 at 12:12 pm to Sinister1
quote:
You LSU turds are fricking unbearable.
This is an "LSU" oriented website which only included the Saints as an addition. LSU fans have the right to wish their players were playing for the Saints.
Posted on 5/11/18 at 12:32 pm to BTRDD
quote:Of course. Just like we have the right to call you all idiots
LSU fans have the right to wish their players were playing for the Saints.
Posted on 5/11/18 at 12:47 pm to BTRDD
quote:
This is an "LSU" oriented website which only included the Saints as an addition
True.
quote:
LSU fans have the right to wish their players were playing for the Saints
True.
quote:
LSU turds are fricking unbearable
True.
ETA: Not all LSU fans are turds, but all fans that bitch about LSU players in relation to the Saints are turds.
This post was edited on 5/11/18 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 5/11/18 at 1:16 pm to AustinKnight
Yeah I mean how dare people make a determination about which back we prefer based on the facts on the ground at the time.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News