Favorite team:New Orleans Saints 
Location:Fantasy Land
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7399
Registered on:3/4/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

I get paid to be here and it's too much


I agree they pay you too much to be here.
:babe:

Babe, not babethread
quote:

This isn't a credit card dispute on your hands. It is an Airbnb dispute. I couldn't tell you how this will turn out bc I don't know the policies but I do know that a simple CC dispute example will not help you here.


Wrong. It's both. Anytime you use a CC for a purchase you have the option to process a chargeback.
I run a team that handles these disputes (called Chargebacks) from a merchant standpoint, and it really boils down to the issuing bank.

AirBNB's terms of service likely spell out cancellations due to weather (I think it specifically references refunds due to mandatory evacuations only), so based on that you're technically screwed. However, quite often issuing banks will side with the card holder anyway (because that's their customer).

I'd say you have about a 50/50 chance. Your chances would be closer to 80% if you had used an AMEX (they are notorious for siding with the cardholder).
quote:

Here we go again. Can we PLEASE stop spending all of our future draft picks??



Seriously. In fact, I hope we don't use any of our draft picks in the actual draft next year and just roll them over to the 2021 draft. Hoarding draft picks is so much more satisfying than actually getting players that could help the team.
quote:

How is this any different than the cake maker who refused to make cakes for gay weddings


That was a business rejecting a customer

This is a customer rejecting a business.

So it's different because it's the exact opposite.
Navarra Beach is awesome. Close enough to Destin to go check out touristy stuff, but quiet and not crowded.

Take the kids to Big Kahunas water park - loved that place as a kid.

re: If not a Rolex, then what?

Posted by GOON on 7/1/19 at 2:43 pm
Get 2,000 swatch watches
The Backpacker. That place with the indoor skiing. For parties they would give everyone sledding disks.

re: Referee Harassment Bill

Posted by GOON on 6/4/19 at 3:20 pm
Again, the statute posted in the OP says "fear of receiving bodily harm", not "feels threatened or has emotional distress". If I'm missing that somewhere, show me where.

Also, "fear of receiving bodily harm" is basically the same thing as "placing of another in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery".

Just don't be an a-hole and threaten an official and everyone will be fine.

re: Referee Harassment Bill

Posted by GOON on 6/4/19 at 3:02 pm
quote:

I'm pointing out the potential for abuse.

In today's world, even a false accusation can ruin someone.



Possibly. And I see your point. There are bad officials, same as there are bad cops and bad lawyers, bad doctors, bad accountants, etc. Some assholes will just be an a-hole no matter what and abuse this law.

But that should be the exception, not the rule. Hopefully.

re: Referee Harassment Bill

Posted by GOON on 6/4/19 at 2:56 pm
quote:

So what about an instance when a malicious official antagonizes a fanbase online, then makes a deliberately false call impacting that team in a game contributing to a loss and it is PROVEN? Are the individuals who called him out now guilty under this law?


I don't know about those that called him out on it. If they threatened him, they should probably still be responsible for the threats. No sporting event should lead to violence. If people are simply, and civilly, questioning the call, that's fine. No problem.

I can tell you this, however, that official SHOULD NOT officiate ever again.

re: Referee Harassment Bill

Posted by GOON on 6/4/19 at 2:55 pm
quote:

That's rule #1: Develop or have a thick skin. You're officiating what's on the field in front of you. Not listening to the immature adults in the stands who like to hear themselves and think they matter.



Exactly. Officials that don't have thick skin don't last very long. We don't hear you on the field. But get in our face as we are leaving and that's a different story.

re: Referee Harassment Bill

Posted by GOON on 6/4/19 at 2:51 pm
quote:

The bill doesn't say that one must threaten an official to be in violation. It says the official, "feels threatened".

So it is solely a subjective decision of the official.

Again, dangerous precedent.


Doesn't it say "fear of receiving bodily harm".

Again, this is very similar to current assault laws and will be enforced the same way. It just creates officials as a protected class (which per my post above you actually want even if you don't know it yet)


quote:

so if a fan or coach tells the ump that he's garbage..the ump can throw that person out of the park, call the cops and say he felt threatened


No, that's not what this bill is for. This isn't for ridicule, this is for threats. Parents yell at us all the time. Multiple times every week. Want to know a secret? We don't hear you from the field. Often it's too loud and we've also trained ourselves to tune you out. This is for the a-hole that approaches us in the parking lot in a threatening manner. Ask us questions respectfully, we'll gladly explain to you that it definitely WAS intentional grounding because the notion of "being outside the tackle box" doesn't exist in high school football.

re: Referee Harassment Bill

Posted by GOON on 6/4/19 at 2:44 pm
quote:

As a referee who has been harassed in the line of duty I support this bill 100%


I'm also an official, and I've personally been threatened. The assault laws would cover this, yes, but this is a much bigger problem than most realize and they are trying to get the issue under control. Maybe they are over-reaching, but probably not. Most states already have this law.

Here's the biggest problem here. Does everyone want sports to exist in 20 years? Unfortunately, they may not, at least in the way we know them today. We are facing a historic shortage of officials in youth and high school sports. Within 5-10 years, games will have to be cancelled or rescheduled for other nights to simply have officials to cover them (actually, it's already happening now). Is everyone in favor of having high school football games 7 nights a week to spread them out in order to have officials to work the games?

You might think I'm exaggerating or speaking in hyperbole, but these are hypothetical situations that could happen. Older officials are retiring and the younger generation doesn't want to do it. Why? Low pay and a lot of hostility.

Honestly, if you want sports to continue the way they are today, be kind and respectful to all officials and encourage young people to officiate.

Everyone is going to downvote me and say I'm crazy, and that's fine. Don't complain when you don't have anyone willing to officiate your kids' sporting events.

re: Erik McCoy

Posted by GOON on 5/1/19 at 8:40 am
quote:

still hoping he can play football
I would have dumped a bucket of pennies on her head.

re: Driving a manual

Posted by GOON on 4/24/19 at 8:56 am
quote:

Lost art

re: Do you ever call stuff Gucci ?

Posted by GOON on 4/22/19 at 2:19 pm
quote:

Do you ever call stuff Gucci ?



Also stay at home dads

Also working moms

Also working dads


Let's not worship only stay at home moms, but rather celebrate all parents. Raising kids is hard work.