- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What happened to Brooke?
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:50 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:50 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
and how many times he's made love to his wife fantasizing about brooke.
Nick fricks. He doesn’t make love.
1
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:56 pm to Snipe
She was pounding Michelob Ultras at the Zurich before she shot her stand-up last time I saw her in person.
They probably got all of WWL-TV video editing software etc.
quote:
Although I’m not quite sure what elevating the video dept means and he did wish her luck.
They probably got all of WWL-TV video editing software etc.
This post was edited on 1/31/24 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 1/31/24 at 6:22 pm to Chief Hinge
Bragging on another man’s dick is weird and beta. Are you a cuck of some sort?
Posted on 1/31/24 at 6:28 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
cute. he should have fricking went on a 10 minute speech how fricking awesome she is, how lucky he was to have her for 5 minutes, and how many times he's made love to his wife fantasizing about brooke.
Sounds like some sick projection.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 6:54 pm to Chalkywhite84
Brooke’s still young and she’s an opportunist . She’s ascending and probably won’t be around NOLA that much longer. Nick needs to get an old head, sometime tied to the region who isn’t going to bounce to a bigger market.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 7:02 pm to Chalkywhite84
quote:
Sounds like some sick projection.
Never swim in de nile
Posted on 1/31/24 at 9:47 pm to Chad504boy
4 pages no pics? Do better
Fine I got it
Fine I got it
This post was edited on 1/31/24 at 11:29 pm
Posted on 1/31/24 at 10:08 pm to LivingstonLaw
that 2nd one isnt brooke. no way.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 11:29 pm to Hester Carries
quote:
that 2nd one isnt brooke. no way.
Fixed it
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:31 am to SaintEB
quote:
Nick has some hard legs on this board that think he can do no wrong. I like the guy enough, but he isn't infallible.
Nick is pretty decent at trying to be impartial and call out the organization when he needs to. The thing that would piss me off is he would try to inject being an SJW into his content (like the way he acted like a bitch when Gruden first started helping the team last offseason). That said he has stopped doing that as much, and he leaves it out for the most part…..which I appreciate.
Overall, I think he is getting better with trying to keep it about football and call out what he should call out about the organization.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:39 am to infantry1026
quote:
Nick is pretty decent at trying to be impartial and call out the organization when he needs to.
He used to be. He just carries water now. He is rarely critical of coaching and would barely acknowledge Pete's issues. Had the back of MT throughout the offseason but did not touch what MT was saying about Carr earlier this year.
Look, I don't blame him. But he has caved to the team, in some regards, because he has gotten the attention of fans and some national media. I hope his company takes off like Barstool and dude creates an empire. But we have to call it like we see it.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:58 am to infantry1026
quote:
Nick is pretty decent at trying to be impartial and call out the organization when he needs to
No he’s not. Everything ends in a pro-Saints slant.
“Man Derek carr isn’t playing good enough” is not being impartial. But that’s the type of benign shite he’ll say to try & sound edgy.
“This is what Mickey Loomis/management wants” is how he paints ideas that he doesn’t agree with.
His access 100% depends on riding the line. I get it, good for him. But it’s easy to see through.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:25 am to SaintEB
quote:
Nick has some hard legs on this board that think he can do no wrong. I like the guy enough, but he isn't infallible.
Definitely not infallible, but by far the best reporter we have. I personally give him credit because at least he breaks news and reports on interesting data, stats, trends. All of his competition aren't doing jack, it amazes me that all of those people still have jobs when they never report anything of substance at all
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:26 am to Rand AlThor
quote:
at least he breaks news
He's being given news. Who cares who breaks news anymore. We find out 3 minutes later anyways.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:30 am to Chad504boy
Chad, I'm sorry he did whatever he did to you, but you need to get the frick over it bro. Like 3/4 of your posts on ST are just hating on Nick Underhill. Who fricking cares
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:45 am to Rand AlThor
quote:
ut you need to get the frick over it bro. Like 3/4 of your posts on ST are just hating on Nick Underhill.
yeah sure buddy. not even close.
quote:
Who fricking cares
are we going to apply this logic to every post on ST or just the ones that get you butthurt?
eta: my last post was a very calm and rational point being made. wasn't even much of a hatin on nick post.
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 9:46 am
Posted on 2/1/24 at 10:56 am to Rand AlThor
quote:
I personally give him credit because at least he breaks news and reports on interesting data, stats, trends.
I'm with Chad on the breaking news part. Meh.
However, I do enjoy his takes on data and stats. I agree with you on that.
Its part of the reason that I subscribed to NOF at one point, but his tendency to bias news had me unsubscribe.
Like I said, I think he is generally good at what he does and has earned a place in NOLA with NOF. I hope he builds an empire on this and has great success.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 11:31 am to infantry1026
quote:
Nick is pretty decent at trying to be impartial and call out the organization when he needs to.
No he isn't...Loomis owns him and gives him his marching orders in exchange for info.
I completely soured on Underhill last season when he started defending retaining allen with clear propaganda sound bytes like "well who else are you going to get that's better?" "no coach will want to come here after you fire a guy following one season" "tanking is bad because it will ruin the culture" (even though Mickey has now admitted the culture has gone to shite anyway, probably because you hired dennis allen).
Started out as a really good beat writer that got some good scoops but then got a little too close and now his opinions are bought and paid for. No point in listening much less paying for that kind of content.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 11:32 am to Lester Earl
do they own Culotta's show or is that a partnership?
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News