Started By
Message

Underhill claims sources tell him the next two are must win

Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:44 pm
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
25606 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:44 pm

quote:



Tripp: it's dead serious and and I think our intuition told us it was serious and we reacted immediately, but also our reporting has has told us it's serious.
the one thing we don't know for sure is the timeline. Was that uh it better be better by the end of the season? Was that uh it better be better by the by-week? or was that it better be better before we leave for Paris? Um, which which is a big question, right? I honestly think if they lose these next two, uh, the smartest bet is if these lo lose these next two, Giants and Paris, which was supposed to be a big big big deal for this organization, and they fall to uh, would that be one and six? One and six. I think the by-week is don't leave your computer, don't leave your phone.

Underhill: quick interjection. Um, so I had a couple conversations with extremely informed close individuals and I think the Paris thing is a massive deal. I think if they go over there and they embarrass themselves in Paris, everything is on the table. I I've been told that that's maybe the thing that's been most important to her in in quite some time. And I think that's fairly obvious, too. the multiple trips over, the buildup, how they're trying to integrate into it, you know, sending Tyler over, sending Tally over. I know she's been over there.
Demario, they took multiple trips.I think they have business dealings that ex, you know, extend beyond just like this game. I think they're trying to get like real footholds there and and you know, try to make it a thing. And um Yes. Like, yeah, I I don't think we have to guess at that. You embarrass me on Monday night. Don't embarrass me in Paris. And you even heard those that was in the speech. we're going to Paris like and that was at the end. It's very clear

Not to be captain obvious here but the news here is that he's talked to people close to the team that are basically confirming what we're discussing.

And some people on here have said she won't do anything until the end of the season ,etc.

Well I think we're in for a wake up call if they don't get it together this week
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 2:54 pm
Posted by tigerbait1.6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2013
5010 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:45 pm to
Nothing will happen.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
181094 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:45 pm to
so at what point was it said the next 2 are must win?
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
25606 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:47 pm to
listen to the clip, it's obvious. "everything is on the table" during the bye week
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
17501 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:51 pm to
So we’re onboard with Underhill now? He’s not just a schill for the team anymore since he’s saying what the board wants to hear?

Just checking cause these things change so fast…
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
133123 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:51 pm to
I do think she cares a LOT about this Paris game. If they go 0 and 2 she will do something

Which is kind of funny if you think about it
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
81210 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:52 pm to
I think because it leads into the bye week
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
78074 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:52 pm to
I mean what's going to happen.
She fires Moore but not the guy who hired him?
Fire(move) Loomis and replaced by whom?
The later seems more likely to me if you want to temporarily please the rabble.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
181094 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:53 pm to
well i think your title is off a bit.

underhill stresses purely the importance of Paris alone. Not 2 games are must wins. Underhill doesn't necessarily say Paris must win but Paris is a huge DO NOT EMBARRASS me type game. Which i can understand and think it is appropriate for Mrs. B to feel that way.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
25606 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

So we’re onboard with Underhill now? He’s not just a schill for the team anymore since he’s saying what the board wants to hear?


take that up with the idiots who spout it around here
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
25606 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:56 pm to
quote:


well i think your title is off a bit.

underhill stresses purely the importance of Paris alone. Not 2 games are must wins. Underhill doesn't necessarily say Paris must win but Paris is a huge DO NOT EMBARRASS me type game. Which i can understand and think it is appropriate for Mrs. B to feel that way.


I didn't put quotations around it, did I? the implication is that if they lose the next two, we're sitting at 1-6 going into the bye week. serious consequences will be coming because season is over at that point and we're embarrassed at: MNF domecoming, Drew's ring of honor AND here pet project Paris game
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
181094 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

I didn't put quotations around it, did I?
quote:

Underhill claims sources tell him the next two are must win


bruh you for real?

we can lose to Giants and win Parish and Underhill didn't claim anything about firing moore in this scenario.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
81210 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:58 pm to
I’m listening now Prox. Nick and Trip fully believe shite is real. I have no reason to not agree with them.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
73152 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:59 pm to
I don’t know if Moore is any good but winning the next two games being necessary is kind of retarded. Just give him the year at this point as guys get healthy to see if he can adapt.

Makes me wonder if it’s just not a good fit behind the scenes.

If true I would’ve never had it on my bingo card that a shitty Paris game would be the thing that got ole lady Gayle ready to lay the hammer down
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
25606 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

we can lose to Giants and win Parish and Underhill didn't claim anything about firing moore in this scenario.


I still think they are in deep shite if they lose to the Giants. They might be able to salvage it if they win in Paris and continue to win, but the ball might already be in motion at that point depending on how they respond.

can they turn it around? sure but that wouldn't give them much breathing room to fix it
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
78074 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:01 pm to
I think its just the fact that Benson reads Tigerdroppings
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
181094 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

ut winning the next two games being necessary is kind of retarded.


i would agree.

but

underhill points out a HUMILIATING showing in Paris could put Mrs. B over the edge and for that I can understand. I guess now its debating grey areas as to what is humiliating etc.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
181094 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

I still think they are in deep shite if they lose to the Giants.


Drew Brees interim HC just to get a free family trip to Paris.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
78074 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:17 pm to
When was the last HC/player in pro ball?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
181094 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

When was the last HC/player in pro ball?


maybe Fuaga can be our Paris head coach. Anything to get him off the line.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram