Started By
Message

re: Simple way out of cap hell

Posted on 2/17/23 at 2:06 pm to
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23525 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 2:06 pm to
Nice spreadsheet. But this,

quote:

Of the QBs that started the most games for each team in 2022


wasn't the argument. So your 65%, while an accurate calculation based off of the data you presented, isn't indicative of "most studs are top 10".

Like you said, 6 move the needle. Let's be honest, no one is clamoring for Goff, Stafford, Or Murray. All 1st overalls.

Now back to OP, I don't disagree that a drafted prospect is the better way to go, IMO. But, your reasoning is flawed. Not to mention, it doesn't necessarily mean that just because you don't sign a FA quarterback, that you'll get out of "cap hell". The term "cap hell" is relative to how you perform on the field and if you can keep your good players. And who know if Carr goes somewhere else and has a resurgence of sorts.
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
32130 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 2:42 pm to
I'm fine with letting Taysom run that type of offense, but for this draft, stack your other positions of need, win 5 games next year and grab a QB in the top 10 of next year's much deeper QB draft.
Posted by Irish Knuckles
Nuwallins
Member since Jan 2015
1256 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 2:51 pm to
we probably aren't going to get a top tier FA qb on the cheap. i like dalton, but we're already paying taysom quite a bit.

just run it back with our solid roster and i still believe taysom has the potential to be a solid qb if he's given the reigns. would be fun if nothing else.

sign the cheapest FA backup qb we can get and roll on through the '23 season. if taysom stays healthy as a qb, i bet we win our sorry division.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464590 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Next year we are projected to start the offseason $0 to $20 over the cap

This estimate is before we kick cans down the road THIS year, which will increase that number significantly
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23525 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

win 5 games next year



1: What makes you think this team will only win 5 games, especially in this division?

2: What guarantees do you have that the guy you want will be there at the pick?

This team will not tank, so to speak. Unless there is a firesale upcoming, they will not be bad enough for a 5 win season. Get used to kicking that can and winning 7-9 games with a meh QB.
Posted by mitchleger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2013
59 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 3:09 pm to
I agree with Saint EB's assessment. The defense is too good, the Saints personnel dept to good, and the division is too bad to finish in top 5. I still think avoiding the high cost free agent QB for one year is the way to go. It will put us in a better position next year to not have to add voidable years. Some of these players that have voidable years added will have performance decline and we will be sitting on more dead money. We need to bite the bullet for a year IMO. That was the point of the post.

Is it likely that Loomis and company do this - NO. Probably Hell no. I still think this is the prudent move for the long term.

I never stated there were no good QBS drafted after the top 10. I said most of the current top QBS were drafted in the top 10. Since we will not likely be in the top 10 we will need to try our luck drafting a sleeper. Hooker could be the answer. Maybe Richardson falls. regardless - AVOID the free agent QB unless you are looking for a back up like Bridgewater.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464590 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Can get under without cutting a single player.

Irrelevant. Can we do it without negatively affecting future caps? That's what matters.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464590 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Tampa is 55M over, like us.

The difference is that can be corrected in one year.

If they restructured a bunch of contracts and added void years to get that number down over a period of 3-4 years, THEN they would be in a similar situation to the Saints, who can't even start to begin to fix our cap unless we sit on it for a year or 2.
Posted by blizzle
Dallas, TX
Member since Jan 2009
1044 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 3:30 pm to
We were $100 million over the cap last year, and were prepared to take on a historic QB contract for Deshaun Watson. Salary cap is about as meaningful as the national debt ceiling
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20592 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

This team will not tank, so to speak

Saw an interview w Shaq the other day. He was asked about Pippen’s comment saying Pippen thought he was the GOAT. They asked Shaq what he thought about the comment and he actually makes sense w why teams/players won’t tank.

Of course Pippen would say that, all players think they’re the best. It’s why the work so hard, “our egos won’t let us think otherwise”

The reality is, players are going to believe they are good enough to win. Maybe w a few pieces on the other side, the team can be better. It’s why historically shitty teams (Clev, NYJ, Det) can still get top players in FA.
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7822 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

wasn't the argument. So your 65%, while an accurate calculation based off of the data you presented, isn't indicative of "most studs are top 10".

Like you said, 6 move the needle. Let's be honest, no one is clamoring for Goff, Stafford, Or Murray. All 1st overalls.

Now back to OP, I don't disagree that a drafted prospect is the better way to go, IMO. But, your reasoning is flawed. Not to mention, it doesn't necessarily mean that just because you don't sign a FA quarterback, that you'll get out of "cap hell". The term "cap hell" is relative to how you perform on the field and if you can keep your good players. And who know if Carr goes somewhere else and has a resurgence of sorts


what metric you want to use Playoff wins?

top twenty QBs in Playoff wins?

60% 1st round picks
40% Top ten in draft


Superbowls?
33 QBs have won at least one superbowl as a starter

60% 1st Round picks
42% Top ten in draft

Overall wins?
top 20 in overall wins

70% 1st round pick
45% top 10 picks

So yeah there are exceptions. But if you want to play the odds you go get a 1st round QB and if it's a top ten QB then you have a better chance



Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19021 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 3:59 pm to
The salary cap is a myth. If there is never an end point and it always goes up, there is no reason to get under the cap ever.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
24717 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 4:15 pm to
I said this days ago. Next year is gonna be painful but with a good draft, we could still lay the groundwork for another solid team. Roll with Taysom. You can draft of get a UDFA QB. Maybe we get lucky. Most importantly, get some of those cap dollars off of the books.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
70540 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Jags had a ton of cap space blew it on a bunch of mid level free agents like Kirk, sure looked like they didn’t have fun in the playoffs while we sat home….


Jags have a great young qb and a great head coach. Kirk also a lot better than what kingsberry and kyler got out of him in that inconsistent system. Kirk balled out last year and is only going to get better with Lawrence.

The Kirk contract thing is kind of a meme now.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23525 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

The difference is that can be corrected in one year.



Tom Brady is carrying a 35 mil cap hit this season. How, because the Buccs do the same thing, as does every team that has to pay a QB more than 25Mil. They get under by spreading out his stuff too. Just like every other team. It will not change and they will continue to do it. Asking a team to get under doesn't matter. All of these teams with QBs coming up, Cincy, Jax, Philly, LAC will all be doing it. Look at Buff, had cap space every season under Allen, new contract, -25M this year. When fans worry about the salary cap, its stupid.

ETA: You do what you have to do to keep your good players. I'm not saying that the Saints could do better or be smarter or whatever, I'm just saying they are doing what every other "competing" team is doing, except they suck at the competing part.
This post was edited on 2/17/23 at 5:32 pm
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23525 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

what metric you want to use Playoff wins?

top twenty QBs in Playoff wins?

60% 1st round picks
40% Top ten in draft


Superbowls?
33 QBs have won at least one superbowl as a starter

60% 1st Round picks
42% Top ten in draft

Overall wins?
top 20 in overall wins

70% 1st round pick
45% top 10 picks

So yeah there are exceptions. But if you want to play the odds you go get a 1st round QB and if it's a top ten QB then you have a better chance


You keep moving the goal posts. No one is arguing your stats. The guy said top 10 are mostly studs. It was proven wrong. Just chill.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464590 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

. Salary cap is about as meaningful as the national debt ceiling

Only if you look at it short term in terms of "getting under the cap"

Look at our annual dead money and our future dead money. I don't mean potential future dead money contracts like Cam and Onyamata have automatic dead money from void years.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464590 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

Tom Brady is carrying a 35 mil cap hit this season. How, because the Buccs do the same thing,

Historically they don't. They re-did it last year for one more run, but they're eating the shite as of now and will only face a 1-year crunch. We were in a similar position years ago and kept pushing money to later years, which compounded our dead money and prevents us from doing anything positive (we just push it down the road, creating more dead cap to hamstring us in the future).

If they can get Brady to play along (like Brees did with us) and make Brady a post-June 1 cut, it will affect 2024, but will allow more options for 2023, but then it's over.

If we get serious about our cap we can't even begin to start until 2024 or maybe 2025. We are that fricked.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31261 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 8:59 am to
quote:

shhhhhhhh you will ruin the perception that it is a Saints/Loomis only deal.

Exactly, but we can exit this pretty quickly if we’re smart. You cut Thomas, do whatever with Kamara, and ride with Taysom for two seasons. Saints would be looking at a bunch of cap room with two years of quality draft picks to work with.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram