Started By
Message

re: Saints trade Lutz to broncos

Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:29 am to
Posted by tigerbait3488
River Ridge
Member since Dec 2007
11584 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:29 am to
No chance you getting a 5th for him.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
57310 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:29 am to
Another cost savings in play
at least you get a pick since you were cutting him anyway
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
37424 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:29 am to
quote:

he is still a good kicker


I guess
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
25120 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:29 am to
Lutz wasn't even subject to waivers. He was going to sign with the Broncos all along.

The only reason we had any leverage is Sean didn't know which kicker we were going to cut.

people bitching about compensation etc. are clueless
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13940 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:29 am to
quote:

I mean, he’s a kicker

He also hasn’t been very good since 2019.
Really? 2020 was not good? His only bad year was last year coming off of an injury. Remember that comment as we have seen that carousel before.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13940 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:31 am to
quote:

I'd be happy with a 7th

Damn happy with a 6th


Wouldn't be surprised if Loomis gives away a pick in the deal. He always seems to add picks to trades. Maybe something like Lutz plus a 2025 7th for a 2024 7th.
Posted by Deplorable Duke
Lousyana
Member since Nov 2016
2619 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:34 am to
So long, Willutz the Putz!
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
7209 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:34 am to
quote:

i expect compensation to be in the area of last pick in 7th of the draft
That's not how any of this works.

quote:

a player who wont make our PS team

Why would we trade for a guy we would immediately cut?
Posted by Vinny V
Kenna Brah
Member since Jun 2011
3885 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:36 am to
quote:

expect compensation to be in the area of last pick in 7th of the draft


Someone doesn’t know how the draft works
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52640 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Really? 2020 was not good? His only bad year was last year coming off of an injury. Remember that comment as we have seen that carousel before.


He was 22nd in FG%, and that’s with guys who attempted at least 20 kicks.

No he wasn’t very good.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22271 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Hard to go with the unknown over a guy who has been a top 5 kicker for the last 7 years

Statistically he was top 5 only 1 time in 7 years, top 10 only 2 times. Kickers have been ridiculously great for awhile. Needing to be over 90% to be considered a top 5 kicker:

2016: 21st at 82.4% (5th was 91.7%)
2017: 13th at 86.1% (5th was 92.5%)
2018: 5th at 93.3%
2019: 7th at 88.9% (5th was 91.7%)
2020: 22nd at 82.1% (5th was 94.9%)
2021: IR (5th was 92.9%)
2022: 32nd at 74.2% (5th was 91.9%)
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
79998 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:44 am to
Lutz and Grupe are both in the top 32 kickers in the NFL. You’re only going to keep 1 so we kept the cheaper and younger guy and maybe get an asset in return.

Totally understandable.

Trading Lutz saves us $1.7mm in cap space
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
22213 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:50 am to
This is how you melt. Well done
Posted by chalmationnation
Member since Nov 2021
211 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:51 am to
He cost us multiple games not sad to see him go. If he makes a couple of kicks last year we also win the division and the narrative around our team completely changes
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41703 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:51 am to
Yeah. If we cut a kicker today, we get nothing. If we get a 7th for him, that's better than nothing.

Look, if someone thinks we traded the wrong guy, that's fine, but saying we should have cut one instead of trading one is beyond stupid.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74480 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Also Nick Underhill seemed to believe Lutz was ahead by a sizeable margin through camp.



They were all over his nuts last training camp as well, declaring him “back”. Game action said he was arguably one of the worst kickers in the league

Lutz is on the last year of his deal. It’s a no brainer to go with the cheaper guy who cannot be any worse than lutz last season.

Logic > emotion

Happy Lutz goes to a spot where he is needed, he will boom the ball in the thin air. We get a young guy who appears to be legit and we at least get something for Lutz. Everyone wins
Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
11437 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:57 am to
We lose some leg distance but Lutz was struggling with consistency. Good move to save $.

I think it is a good decision.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Someone doesn’t know how the draft works



well then maybe you should educate yourself on how the draft works

with this FO we will get much less than lutz is worth, thats a given
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

i expect compensation to be in the area of last pick in 7th of the draft
That's not how any of this works.


great so you think when we trade a player to another team, we get no draft picks for them, where did you learn that BS

quote:

Why would we trade for a guy we would immediately cut?


because its loomis and allen, they have a long record of getting much less than players are worth in trades
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
77168 posts
Posted on 8/29/23 at 12:04 pm to
Came in to take a look...


Oh well
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram