Started By
Message

re: QB's measured at the Reese's Senior Bowl

Posted on 1/31/22 at 4:45 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 4:45 pm to
I cNt find a picture of picket throwing without a gloves

He may have small hands.

Idk if it matters has he lost many fumbles in his career?
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13945 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 5:33 pm to
Found these 2 references. Once says he had 19 fumbles form 18-20 and the other has 26 total fumbles. If those as accurate, that seems very high.



LINK

LINK
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74483 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

Some reports have Pickett’s hand size at around 8.25 inches, while others tell of a figure slightly under 8. Whatever the case, this isn’t your usual hand size discussion. This is legitimate uncharted territory. A historical comparison — using data provided by resident RAS guru Kent Lee Platte — shows just how far off the map we are.

Over the past 37 seasons, 650 quarterbacks have registered hand measurements, either at combines or pro days. Of those 650 quarterbacks, Pickett would have the third-smallest hands of the group with his reported measurements. Only Tony Lowery (7.63 inches) and Doug Hudson (7.25 inches) had smaller. Divide it up, and Pickett’s hands are smaller than 99.6% of all hand measurements on record over that range. He’s in the 0.4th percentile.



Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
12620 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 6:29 pm to
Welp, I feel like he'll be there at #18 if we want him
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
34976 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 6:37 pm to
I think he was probably going to be there around 18 anyway.

Some teams still stick to hand measurements and some don't.

Let him wear gloves in the league.

Burrow has 9 inch hands and people were complaining about him before the draft.

We see how that worked out.
This post was edited on 1/31/22 at 6:38 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
291707 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 6:40 pm to
He will be there long past 18 if his hands are 8.25
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22974 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

I think he was probably going to be there around 18 anyway.


Nothing is conclusive until the Combine & Pro Days. It's way too early in the process to speak definitively. The interview process at the Combine holds a ton of weight especially for QB prospects.

At this time in 2017, Patrick Mahomes was viewed by the majority of draft boards as a 2-3 rounder then the Combine & Pro Day came around. That same draft Tim Williams was being mentioned as a top 10 potential pick but then character issues & failed drug test caused him to fall to 3rd round.

Back in 2011, Da'Quan Bowers was viewed as the consensus #1 pick again around this same time of year until his medical exams at the Combine showed Bowers had a degenerative knee condition which caused him to fall to the second round.

These things can go either way. So just have some patience until after the Combine because some of this stuff is useless until then.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
34321 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

He will be there long past 18 if his hands are 8.25



Nah. He still has good tape. But he will be in the 20s
Posted by CnAzInCA
Dallas, Texas
Member since Jan 2014
621 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 7:50 pm to
Just for comparison, hand span (thumb to little finger) in inches:

Michael Vick: 8.5

Taysom Hill: 8.75

Tony Romo: 8.86

Tommy Hodson: 8.88

Joe Burrow: 9.0

Ryan Tannehill: 9.0

Jared Goff: 9.0

Patrick Mahomes: 9.25

Baker Mayfield: 9.25

Aaron Rogers: 9.38

Tom Brady: 9.38

Jameis Winston: 9.38

Kyler Murray: 9.5

Trevor Siemian: 9.88

Ian Book: 9.88

Andrew Luck: 10.0

Matt Stafford: 10.0

Trevor Lawrence: 10.0

Justin Herbert: 10.0

Peyton Manning: 10.13

Josh Allen: 10.13

Russell Wilson: 10.25

Drew Brees: 10.25

Brett Farve: 10.38

Ryan Leaf: 10.5

Mark Sanchez: 10.5

Chris Simms: 10.5

Nick Foles: 10.63

Heath Shuler: 10.63

Ryan Fitzpatrick: 10.75

Dak Prescott: 10.88

Jim Druckenmiller: 11.25
This post was edited on 1/31/22 at 8:05 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
291707 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 7:58 pm to
Some of those predate accurate combine recording. But anything sub 9” does not bode well.

8 1/4th is in a different stratosphere of tiny
Posted by tigerterrace
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Sep 2016
3475 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 8:03 pm to
Willis will likely be a star because he was once at Auburn and it would be very Auburn to run off a 1st round draft pick.

Posted by CnAzInCA
Dallas, Texas
Member since Jan 2014
621 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 8:10 pm to
How difficult can it be to record hand size accurately?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
291707 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 8:13 pm to
The combine & its coverage has grown tenfold in the last 20years.

I don’t think they were recoded wrong firsthand. I am just not sure they made it accurately to the internet 15 years later.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22974 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

But he will be in the 20s


All it takes is for one team in the top 10 to fall in love in with him at the Combine for him to go before then.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
34321 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 9:23 pm to
Don’t get it twisted, despite the hand size issues, I still believe in Pickett.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
77207 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 9:26 pm to
Lol
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22974 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Don’t get it twisted, despite the hand size issues, I still believe in Pickett.


Out of all the QB prospects in this draft, I believe he has the highest percentage to be decent starter as a rookie. He's just not a day one starter game 1 out of training camp. Pickett is a guy you bring along slowly.

My main point is all this speculation is useless until the Combine & Pro Days. Once there's more info on Pickett then it will become somewhat clearer on his draft position. Right now it's just too early in the process to give definitive projections.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
34321 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 10:25 pm to
If he does measure historically small hands…if he does everything else well…then why not gamble on it? It used to be that quarterbacks couldn’t be short and have any success but that’s been proven wrong. Could he fumble more? Maybe. But if he excels at everything else then I’m sure a lot of teams would be ok with it taking him and just give him a great OL


Idk. It worries me about his hand size but the dude still spins it and has been impressive. And he’ll play in warm weather or in a dome for 6 games every season, sometimes more depending on who is on the schedule. Plus more and more teams are going with enclosed stadiums anyway. And he’s played at Pitt with the gloves. Not like he was playing at Miami the whole time so he knows how to play in the cold.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22974 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

If he does measure historically small hands…if he does everything else well…then why not gamble on it? It used to be that quarterbacks couldn’t be short and have any success but that’s been proven wrong. Could he fumble more? Maybe. But if he excels at everything else then I’m sure a lot of teams would be ok with it taking him and just give him a great OL


quote:

Idk. It worries me about his hand size but the dude still spins it and has been impressive. And he’ll play in warm weather or in a dome for 6 games every season, sometimes more depending on who is on the schedule. Plus more and more teams are going with enclosed stadiums anyway. 


First off, there's no way anyone can make a legit projection where Pickett will go in the draft until he works out for teams at the Combine & Pro Day along with his in person interviews at the Combine. These early projections by draft sites are trash until this part of the process is completed.

Secondly, too often people get caught up in the physical measurables of a QB during draft season. There's so many other factors that come into play with QB's outside of physical measurables or what their highlights look like. Then these sites & "tv analyst" hype up every prospect as the next coming so it only makes matters even worse.

The QB position is unlike any other in professional sports. There's other intangibles that aren't seen by the average fan that comes into play as to whether or not a prospect came succeed at the NFL level. Sometimes those intangibles get exposed prior to the draft process. Sometimes they aren't. There are a lot of unknowns surrounding Pickett which is why I'm beating the drum to allow more information to surface after the Combine & his Pro Day at Pitt. That's all I'm saying here.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22974 posts
Posted on 1/31/22 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

Give me willis or pickett


Willis is the definition of a boom or bust prospect. He's not a day one starter nor is he someone who should see the field at all his rookie year. He's highly talented yet not skilled enough to throw out there as an NFL starter his freshman year. Unfortunately, some organization could very well fall in love with his physical talent, feed him to the wolves as a rookie & ruin any chance he has to be a successful NFL QB.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram