- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:51 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Giants are taking Downs at 5.
1.Mendoza
2. Reese/ Bailey
3. Bailey/ Reese
4. Love
5. Styles
6. OL/ WR
I'm pretty confident this will be the top 5 whether the Cardinals/ Giants trade their picks or just draft.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:11 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Giants are taking Styles at 5.
And Downs at 10 if he’s there
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:13 pm to Midget Death Squad
quote:
Yes you do if he is a generational talent. Downs appears to be that
Correct.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:31 pm to DomincDecoco
Downs shouldn’t make it to 10 if he’s there at 8. I would love to have him.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:36 pm to jamal
quote:I would not mind the pick. However, I have heard a lot of reports that there is not a ton of difference between him and the next 2-3 safeties in many scouts' eyes. They seem to love them all for different reasons.
Downs shouldn’t make it to 10 if he’s there at 8. I would love to have him.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:43 pm to Fun Bunch
This tells me Bain is not on our board in the first.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:43 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
However, I have heard a lot of reports that there is not a ton of difference between him and the next 2-3 safeties in many scouts' eyes.
I keep hearing stuff like this but I'm not sure how it matters. Delane/ Bain/ Downs are the next best up for their positions and if there's only OL/ WR's between them and teams don't need OL/ WR what does it change? Most of the positions are in the same boat this year.
It doesnt matter how close the other DE/ S/ CB are. If a team needs S and its pick the best one or pick between 20 WR's/ OL they are just going to pick the safetey.
People are acting like 32 teams want to trade back but 32 people have to be picked 1-32.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:16 pm to Proximo
Yeah its trade up not down..
Posted on 4/22/26 at 6:42 pm to Tank77
quote:
So Delane and Downs maybe Tate
Hope so
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 6:45 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:00 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Sounds like the opposite. They want the player with the fewest question marks so they are staying put
Such a horrible draft philosophy
Trading down is absolutely the way to go. You need lots of good players to fill out this roster, and you need them on the cheap. Trading back gives you a chance to make that happen if you pick well.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:10 pm to Snipe
quote:
Tate is good but he's Chris Olave, bascially
You do realize how stupid this sounds? He’s bigger than Olave. So if you can get a bigger Olave at 8, I take that all day.
Olave was 2nd team All pro this year, that means only a few receivers were better than him in the league this year.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:18 pm to Midget Death Squad
quote:
Yes you do if he is a generational talent. Downs appears to be that
He will have to be Ed Reed to justify taking him at 8. Assuming he’s playing safety. I think he will be good, but there are questions about his athleticism.
Basically I see him as maybe a better version of Brian branch, someone we passed on in the 2nd round b/c Loomis thought so little if his athleticism. Is that worth taking at 8 overall? At one of the more devalued positions in the league?
I don’t think so.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 9:19 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News