- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Micah Parsons wants to be traded
Posted on 8/1/25 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 8/1/25 at 1:47 pm
Should we?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 1:51 pm to Lgrnwd
Whats the point if we cant sign him?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 1:55 pm to Lgrnwd
Micah is gonna going to get something like a 5 yr 200MM contract.
Ask yourself. Is that something a rebuilding team should invest in?
Ask yourself. Is that something a rebuilding team should invest in?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 1:58 pm to Mouth
Yes they should. He’s 26 and better than any pass rusher you’ll potentially be able to pick in future drafts.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:01 pm to Lgrnwd
Kahlil Mack was traded to the Bears and the Bears had to give up two first rounders, a 3rd, and 6th round.
From the Raiders they got a 2nd and a 5th round pick I think.
Not saying it would take the same kind of haul to get him but better to leave things be for now IMO
From the Raiders they got a 2nd and a 5th round pick I think.
Not saying it would take the same kind of haul to get him but better to leave things be for now IMO
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:07 pm to DBG
Oh boy.
I won’t be back in this thread.
I won’t be back in this thread.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:11 pm to Mouth
Not saying I want to. But would I trade 2 firsts for Parsons? 1000% yes.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:19 pm to DBG
2 firsts and a $200MM contract? For a rebuilding team? Yall are the same loons that complain about everything and then say shite like this.
Seriously, now I’m out of this thread.
Seriously, now I’m out of this thread.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:23 pm to Mouth
quote:
Micah is gonna going to get something like a 5 yr 200MM contract.
Ask yourself. Is that something a rebuilding team should invest in?
Its probably the perfect situation as your arent paying a QB that. Teams with cheap QBs will probably be his only suitors.
I wouldn't be thrilled about paying a non QB that but I can see the appeal.
Listen, by the time we actually have our franchise QB and it will be time to pay him that Parsons deal will expire or we trade him at that point.
This post was edited on 8/1/25 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:24 pm to DBG
quote:
But would I trade 2 firsts for Parsons? 1000% yes.
And pay him with what? Mardi Gras beads?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:34 pm to Lgrnwd
quote:
Should we?
The real question is can we?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:41 pm to Lgrnwd
No way. We are just now getting out of salary cap albatross. Don’t sacrifice it for him.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:47 pm to mdomingue
quote:Yes we can. Easily. But should we?
The real question is can we?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 2:49 pm to Lgrnwd
No, we shouldn’t. This is a move you make when you’re one or 2 pieces away from truly winning a ring. If it was just signing him to a massive deal? Yeah they should easily make it happen and could make it happen. Should they give up multiple first rounders and a player or so then sign him? That’s a very stupid move in our position!
Posted on 8/1/25 at 3:31 pm to Lgrnwd
Yes. How often to you get a chance at a likely Hall of Famer in his prime at a premium position? He changes the defense entirely.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 3:43 pm to Mouth
A team with $20M in cap($87M in dead cap right now). -$24.5M next year and dead cap of $56M for next year
Posted on 8/1/25 at 4:44 pm to Lgrnwd
We can keep 200 mil and get multiple players.
Popular
Back to top

16








