- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jameis Winston, Andrus Peat among potential Saints cap cuts in 2023 offseason
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:07 pm
LINK
They list lutz, Thomas, and trequan as the others. If all 5 moves are made at the optimal time, where's that put us against the cap?
They list lutz, Thomas, and trequan as the others. If all 5 moves are made at the optimal time, where's that put us against the cap?
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:35 pm to msstate7
Jameis should have never been signed after Brees left so his exodus from the team is 2 years past due.
The only thing people say positive about TreQuan is that he blocks good. He won't be missed. Always hurt too.
Kicker can definitely be upgraded but you could do a lot worse than Lutz. He is in a 4 year linear regression in FG% so that obviously needs to be considered.
The only thing people say positive about TreQuan is that he blocks good. He won't be missed. Always hurt too.
Kicker can definitely be upgraded but you could do a lot worse than Lutz. He is in a 4 year linear regression in FG% so that obviously needs to be considered.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:41 pm to msstate7
It’s kind of in the article, just need to do the math. Article assume saints are $53-57M over.
Jamies: $4.4M if cut now, $12.8 post 6/1
Peat: $1.4M if cut now, $11.8 post 6/1
Lutz: $3.7M if cut now, $3.7 post 6/1
Tre’Quan: $1.9M if cut now, $2.9 post 6/1
MT: $13M if cut now, $1.2M post 6/1
So you cut MT, Tre’Quan & Lutz now, and designate Peat & Winston as post 6/01. That saves $43.2M against the 2023 cap; but also puts about $19.2M of dead money on 2024 cap. Loomis will still need to move $10-14M to be compliant, and even more to fill the roster and sign rookies
Jamies: $4.4M if cut now, $12.8 post 6/1
Peat: $1.4M if cut now, $11.8 post 6/1
Lutz: $3.7M if cut now, $3.7 post 6/1
Tre’Quan: $1.9M if cut now, $2.9 post 6/1
MT: $13M if cut now, $1.2M post 6/1
So you cut MT, Tre’Quan & Lutz now, and designate Peat & Winston as post 6/01. That saves $43.2M against the 2023 cap; but also puts about $19.2M of dead money on 2024 cap. Loomis will still need to move $10-14M to be compliant, and even more to fill the roster and sign rookies
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:52 pm to msstate7
Horrible cap and contract management. We knew Peat was a disaster front office ego driven extension.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 2:03 pm to msstate7
Peat: Post June 1 Cut/Trade
11.825mil saved (6.546mil dead)
- Pay cut option
Thomas: Post June 1 Cut/Trade
1.165mil saved (11.993mil dead)
- This has to be done or it'll affect us in 2024
Lutz: June 1 Cut/Trade
3.7mil saved (1.92mil dead)
- This is a pay cut option
Smith: June 1 Cut
1.9mil saved (1.5mil dead)
- this is more likely to just stay as is, you gonna replace him with 1.9mil?
But in general:
Peat & Thomas June 1 Cut puts us at 45mil over the cap
We'd need to do:
Lattimore restructure: saves 10mil
Ramczyk restructure: saves 10mil
McCoy restructure: saves 8mil
- these 3 are most likely to occur since they're young building blocks.
Jordan restructure: saves 10mil
Kamara restructure: saves 7.5mil
Winston june 1 cut: saves 12.8mil (2.8mil dead)
Hill restructure: saves 7mil
Davis restructure: saves 6mil
- Do these 5 are we actually have 25mil to spend
11.825mil saved (6.546mil dead)
- Pay cut option
Thomas: Post June 1 Cut/Trade
1.165mil saved (11.993mil dead)
- This has to be done or it'll affect us in 2024
Lutz: June 1 Cut/Trade
3.7mil saved (1.92mil dead)
- This is a pay cut option
Smith: June 1 Cut
1.9mil saved (1.5mil dead)
- this is more likely to just stay as is, you gonna replace him with 1.9mil?
But in general:
Peat & Thomas June 1 Cut puts us at 45mil over the cap
We'd need to do:
Lattimore restructure: saves 10mil
Ramczyk restructure: saves 10mil
McCoy restructure: saves 8mil
- these 3 are most likely to occur since they're young building blocks.
Jordan restructure: saves 10mil
Kamara restructure: saves 7.5mil
Winston june 1 cut: saves 12.8mil (2.8mil dead)
Hill restructure: saves 7mil
Davis restructure: saves 6mil
- Do these 5 are we actually have 25mil to spend
Posted on 1/16/23 at 2:20 pm to msstate7
I think Lutz is safe for one more season but there will be serious competition brought in to push him.
I also can't wait for Peat to not be on this team anymore.
I also can't wait for Peat to not be on this team anymore.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 2:29 pm to Weekend Warrior79
MT13 has to have some trade value to some team who thinks they are a piece away. Ravens or someone who is trying to prop up their QB like Russel Wilson or someone.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 2:34 pm to VictoryHill
quote:
The only thing people say positive about TreQuan is that he blocks good. He won't be missed. Always hurt too.
Dude is gone they didn't want him back this year.
No one is trading for MT and having to take on that contract. Just wait till he is released and save money.
This post was edited on 1/16/23 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 1/16/23 at 2:48 pm to htran90
Jordan restructure: saves 10mil
Kamara restructure: saves 7.5mil
Hill restructure: saves 7mil
Davis restructure: saves 6mil
Do these contracts as written prohibit these guys for trade value?
Cause we need picks. I love these guys but we are in a rebuild.
Kamara restructure: saves 7.5mil
Hill restructure: saves 7mil
Davis restructure: saves 6mil
Do these contracts as written prohibit these guys for trade value?
Cause we need picks. I love these guys but we are in a rebuild.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 2:53 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Jordan restructure: saves 10mil
if he wants to stay and retire a saint, financially its not too bad to do so
quote:
Kamara restructure: saves 7.5mil
Better to trade post june 1 (saves 10mil) dead money is about 5mil.
quote:
Hill restructure: saves 7mil
Also a post june 1 trade/cut, prior costs us $
Davis is also a post june 1 trade/cut
Posted on 1/16/23 at 3:01 pm to htran90
quote:
this is more likely to just stay as is, you gonna replace him with 1.9mil?
I don't think the month as important as the roster spot. Let's see what we've got with younger guys
quote:
Do these 5 are we actually have 25mil to spend
I'm of the opinion that you let deals on older guys run... If you have to cut them later, you're not eating as much dead cap space on down the road
Posted on 1/16/23 at 3:02 pm to Suntiger
MT has ZERO!!!!!! trade value I can’t believe people still think they can play fantasy GM and get a good draft pick just because the player was good once upon a time. You are trading the contract as much as the player and his is one of the worst in football. Add that with he hasn’t played in 3 years and he’s a 30 year old injury plagued diva WR and what you get in trade is nothing. Releasing him is your ONLY option.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 3:05 pm to Geauxldilocks
quote:
Horrible cap and contract management. We knew Peat was a disaster front office ego driven extension
I am so tired of seeing this damn word in here. It's fricken football people, egos drive the whole league!
Posted on 1/16/23 at 3:10 pm to jrobic4
quote:
I'm of the opinion that you let deals on older guys run... If you have to cut them later, you're not eating as much dead cap space on down the road
Agreed. For years, we've pushed money down the road (i.e. borrowing next years cap to pay for this year) and its time to just recoup and build up the credit again.
Push back what you need to (i.e. young guys you intend on keeping and building around) and get under the cap. Let the older guys (Cam, Davis) dictate their intent and if they intend on staying than keep them as is. If they wanna be moved, trade them for relief.
The question marks I think are guys like AK who you really could get value from them and not lose that premium of a player.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 3:14 pm to Suntiger
Slant boy has no trade value. Not only is he overpaid he is not what he used to be production wise. Hasn't played in essentially 3 years. Even if healthy I don't thing he can be close to what he was in 2019.
Posted on 1/17/23 at 9:09 am to Suntiger
quote:
MT13 has to have some trade value
Let's assume teams overlook the injury, and potential tantrum, situations over the past few years and want to give him value based on 2019 and potential. Even in that scenario, MT has absolutely no trade value for 2023 draft picks, and I am sure his agent made sure to structure the contract that way. MT will either be cut by the beginning of March, or he'll be on the team in 2023.
If they keep him on the team, his 2023 cap hit is $13.4M, $14.2M in 2024, and $6.2M in dead money for 2025.
If they cut him and designate him a post 6/01, the 2023 cap hit is $12M and $14.1M in 2024
If they trade him for draft picks his 2023 cap hit will be $26.2M.
Above numbers are from piecing together info from OTC & sporttrac. Since it appears the value would be the same, there is an argument to keep him on the team for 2023 and try to showcase him before the trade deadline and get picks for 2024.
This post was edited on 1/17/23 at 9:10 am
Posted on 1/17/23 at 9:14 am to msstate7
Peat’s tenure as as Saint can’t end soon enough
Posted on 1/17/23 at 9:15 am to Geauxldilocks
We knew we had to pay our bill at some point.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News