- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Draft: Want/Don't Want/Will Be
Posted on 4/24/16 at 10:56 am to Fun Bunch
Posted on 4/24/16 at 10:56 am to Fun Bunch
he had low sack numbers but they think he has some pass rushing upside. He was quite disruptive last despite his numbers.
DT is too deep to take him at 12 though. I like him as a player but would flip my shite.
DT is too deep to take him at 12 though. I like him as a player but would flip my shite.
Posted on 4/24/16 at 11:45 am to KindaRaw
Want: Lawson
Not: Treadwell
Will be: Eli Apple
Not: Treadwell
Will be: Eli Apple
Posted on 4/24/16 at 2:46 pm to mmonro3
Want A'Shawn Robinson who is the most sure fire blue blood beast can't miss DT in the draft
Saints will probably over think it and take Rankins or Reed.
Saints will probably over think it and take Rankins or Reed.
Posted on 4/24/16 at 2:50 pm to boxcar willie
Rankins is more safe than A'Shawn to me.
Posted on 4/24/16 at 3:28 pm to Fun Bunch
Want Lawson/Spence
Don't want A'Shawn
Will be Rankins
Don't want A'Shawn
Will be Rankins
Posted on 4/24/16 at 3:50 pm to Chad504boy
Wow! Why all the hate for A'Shawn and Jarran? I watched them many times last year and they looked great. I expect A'Shawn to go in the teens and Jarran the mid 20s.
Posted on 4/24/16 at 3:58 pm to SNAPPERHEAD
Let's hope A'Shawn does indeed go in teens
Posted on 4/24/16 at 4:02 pm to Chad504boy
Please trade up and get Buckner
Posted on 4/24/16 at 4:08 pm to SNAPPERHEAD
people are skeptical because:
A'Shawn is a physical specimen but his game film is a bit underwhelming.
Reed is strictly a run defense guy. He's amazing at that, but has no pass rush.
A'Shawn is a physical specimen but his game film is a bit underwhelming.
Reed is strictly a run defense guy. He's amazing at that, but has no pass rush.
Posted on 4/24/16 at 4:17 pm to Fun Bunch
I think I'd rather Dodd over Lawson, don't really care for jack conklin
I imagine it'll be a DT or a corner though. Let's go with Hargreaves.
I imagine it'll be a DT or a corner though. Let's go with Hargreaves.
Posted on 4/24/16 at 4:31 pm to Fun Bunch
Want: Jack or Lawson
Not want: A.Robinson
Will be: Jackson III or Hargreaves
if what they are saying about Jack's knee is true then nevermind but people could also be floating stuff out there for the sake of doing it. If he's good to go then that's who I want the most no question about it. But making it to #12 should be tricky.
Not want: A.Robinson
Will be: Jackson III or Hargreaves
if what they are saying about Jack's knee is true then nevermind but people could also be floating stuff out there for the sake of doing it. If he's good to go then that's who I want the most no question about it. But making it to #12 should be tricky.
Posted on 4/24/16 at 5:02 pm to Fun Bunch
I want us to focus on defense
This post was edited on 4/24/16 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 4/24/16 at 5:06 pm to LooseCannon22282
The more I read on Rankins the more I like. There are some comparisons to Sapp that I can see. Has the non-stop motor rep too. I'm really wanting a dynamic disruptive playmaker. I'm ready to deal with character concerns like Spence or injury issues like Jack or Lawson. Who can come in and defenses will have to account for?
Posted on 4/24/16 at 5:51 pm to blueslover
Spence or Rankins is making most sense for what i think saints will do
Posted on 4/24/16 at 7:34 pm to SirWinston
Still miles better than the shite you post
Posted on 4/24/16 at 7:35 pm to Fun Bunch
Who do want? TRADE DOWN
Who do you not want? A. ROBINSON/ALA
Who will it actually be? V. HARGREAVES OR QB LYNCH
Who do you not want? A. ROBINSON/ALA
Who will it actually be? V. HARGREAVES OR QB LYNCH
Posted on 4/24/16 at 7:42 pm to SNAPPERHEAD
IT'S EASY TO "LOOK GREAT" WHEN YOU'RE PLAYING NEXT TO OTHER NFL TALENT WHILE IN COLLEGE. The Bama DB's force the QB to hold the ball longer which allows the line to get to the QB more often.
It's difficult to sort this out while analyzing tape. When playing Obama you really can't double team one guy or the other one will make you pay.
If you play on a college "D" and you're the best player and you're beating double or triple teams, then you should do well in the NFL.
If you are an RB and you play for LSU and you run pretty good, you should succeed in the NFL. Why? Because everyone knows which play LSU is going to run. IF you have enough talent to do decent when the other defense knows the play you plan to run, then you can play in the NFL. The LSU RBs seems to be having more success than the Bama RBs. Baja RBs rarely face a stacked line like LSU RBs do.
It's difficult to sort this out while analyzing tape. When playing Obama you really can't double team one guy or the other one will make you pay.
If you play on a college "D" and you're the best player and you're beating double or triple teams, then you should do well in the NFL.
If you are an RB and you play for LSU and you run pretty good, you should succeed in the NFL. Why? Because everyone knows which play LSU is going to run. IF you have enough talent to do decent when the other defense knows the play you plan to run, then you can play in the NFL. The LSU RBs seems to be having more success than the Bama RBs. Baja RBs rarely face a stacked line like LSU RBs do.
Posted on 4/24/16 at 9:04 pm to HMTVBrian2
quote:
I think I'd rather Dodd over Lawson,
why?
Posted on 4/24/16 at 9:10 pm to Fun Bunch
Someone please explain the Rankins love? Guy seems low key which is great in Nola but convince me what will make him a playmaker on this defense.
Posted on 4/24/16 at 9:12 pm to Fun Bunch
Rankins/Treadwell/Probably a corner or some shite(Hargreaves specifically).
Popular
Back to top


0





