Started By
Message

re: Didn’t we trade a high pick for Vele to help our bad redzone offense

Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:12 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:12 am to
quote:

A 4th rd pick is a massive loss that we will never recover from.

Why lie?

What was the point in wasting an early 4th for a bottom-3 team in the NFL?

He has no long-term value, either, due to his age. He's only valuable for a year or 2 while on his rookie deal, when we will suck.

So why did we spend a 4th on him?

That's ignoring that a 4th for Vele is insane in terms of the market, too.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13687 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Regardless, we traded 2 picks for a 6'5" WR to help us in the red zone and Moore had him glued to the bench in the red zone. (Sounds familiar to DA with Graham last year). Instead, we had 3 small WRs who are not physical running around trying to get open in tight windows. There is no excuse to not using Vele in the red zone


This is the point I was trying to make. Why not throw some up to him. We could have trotted out the corpse of Graham again this year just for the red zone targets if that’s what we were looking for.
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
28031 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

TigerSaurus


How anyone can write what you wrote, proof it and still decide to hit send amazes me. I’m embarrassed for you. You’re one strange imbecile
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 6:56 pm
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
25713 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

consider top 100 picks quality draft picks.


That's because you dont know anything about the success rate of draft picks based on range.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13687 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

That's because you dont know anything about the success rate of draft picks based on range.


But let’s ignore the list of a few players I named that could be in the HoF taken around that pick made by the front office that is still in charge….
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
25713 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

But let’s ignore the list of a few players I named that could be in the HoF taken around that pick made by the front office that is still in charge


Show me a few picks that are HoF around that area and I'll show you 10 times as many that flamed out.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73795 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:38 pm to
If you ask CKM I bet he will have an answer for you.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
33396 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 2:35 am to
quote:

Idk maybe. Are you going to tell the board again how much better Miller is than Achane?


I never said that you fricking weirdo.

I like achane as a player too.

Why are you lying like a 12 yr old?
Posted by Sunnyvale
Member since Feb 2024
2256 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 5:43 am to
So by that, all our red zone issues should be fixed?

Did you let our coach, KM, that our redzone offense has help?
This post was edited on 9/14/25 at 5:49 am
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
10368 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 2:47 pm to
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
44714 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 2:48 pm to
... but he told you.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
73893 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 2:48 pm to


Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
44714 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 2:49 pm to
Nice!

Gyne for the win.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram