- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Derek Carr seeking $35M or more per year in free agent contract
Posted on 2/27/23 at 6:53 am to Townedrunkard
Posted on 2/27/23 at 6:53 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
You should do some research first before laughing.
The 17th highest paid qb in 2022 was our very own Crab legs making 15.2 million.
The 18th was Tom Brady making 15 million. Jimmy G was next making 10. That’s smack in the middle of 32 teams, that means almost half had starters that made less than 10 million last year.
What was their average cap hit?
Brady's "15M" doesn't take into account all the other money he had already been paid. That's why his cap hit this year is $35M.
That $35M in dead cap means he was paid $35M more than what the Bucs had accounted for in their cap hits. This includes his base salaries (like what the article used).
Look at the article:
quote:
Here’s a look at which quarterbacks made over $1 million in cash—as opposed to salary cap figure
Literally a worthless ranking.
This post was edited on 2/27/23 at 6:55 am
Posted on 2/27/23 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What was their average cap hit?
quote:
Literally a worthless ranking.
So the cap hit means something now? With as much as we have manipulated the cap over the years that number is suppose to mean anything. Winston’s cap was way below 15 this year, so it goes both ways.
That poster thought 15 a year was low. About half the league QBs made less. That’s cash that they made with several making that on one year deals.
This post was edited on 2/27/23 at 8:04 am
Posted on 2/27/23 at 9:07 am to GMoney2600
the writing was on the wall with Carr after he visited and the exercised his no trade clause.... he wants money that we ain't got... he will not be our next QB...
what's going to end up happening is we will run it back with Dalton, likely take a QB in round 1 or 2... those will be your QBs going into the season
what's going to end up happening is we will run it back with Dalton, likely take a QB in round 1 or 2... those will be your QBs going into the season
Posted on 2/27/23 at 9:16 am to chRxis
If we miss on carr, I'd go the cheaper or Dalton/Brissett.
Posted on 2/27/23 at 9:35 am to Townedrunkard
The cap hit aside, I would think you would want to try to avoid being in the soft-middle which is paying a big salary to a player who is not a big upgrade. The difference between the best and let's say 6th best qb to be generous is not massive. The gap between 6 and 14 in terms of production over replacement value is pretty big. What gets you askew is paying what it takes to get the 14th best qb (if that's truly where Carr is) when it is out of whack with what he can deliver. Being saddled with it for 3 years and the accompanying cap hit when you move on I think is a real issue.
Will be interesting to see if they want to overpay for a league average qb. How much better would Carr make the Saints over, let's say Cooper Rush who is average at best? How much better would Carr be than Mayfield? I wouldn't think the gap would justify the cost.
Will be interesting to see if they want to overpay for a league average qb. How much better would Carr make the Saints over, let's say Cooper Rush who is average at best? How much better would Carr be than Mayfield? I wouldn't think the gap would justify the cost.
This post was edited on 2/27/23 at 11:49 am
Posted on 2/27/23 at 10:06 am to therick711
quote:
What gets you askew is paying what it takes to get the 14th best qb (if that's truly where Carr is)
I have him in the 10-12 range, but that's a debate for a different day.
What's funny about a lot of the comments about $35M being too much, is that would actually put him at 8th highest paid QB for 2023. And that is before Lamar, Burrow (rumor is they are working on a new deal), Garoppolo, Daniel Jones all get their new deals. Jimmy G & Jones may not land over $35M, but they will be in the discussion.
To be the 14th highest QB, after the above 4 deals are done, would have his cap hit around $30M
Posted on 2/27/23 at 12:48 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
So the cap hit means something now?
I said average cap hit, which reflects the actual amount paid over the contract. Just to be clear, I'm saying the average of all cap hits of the contract the team realized. The money actually paid to a player will be accounted on the cap, one way or another, which is reflected in the total cap hits.
quote:
With as much as we have manipulated the cap over the years that number is suppose to mean anything.
You do realize we ultimately pay the piper, on our cap, right?
quote:
That poster thought 15 a year was low. About half the league QBs made less.
First of all, the starting QB contracts should not be based on a population of all starters. Remove rookie contracts and it's a legitimate comparison (since Rookies don't get market rate due to CBA manipulation).
Second, as shown above, the article didn't use good data.
So, a bad population to compare + bad data compared. Quality output is guaranteed.
Posted on 2/27/23 at 3:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
First of all, the starting QB contracts should not be based on a population of all starters. Remove rookie contracts and it's a legitimate comparison (since Rookies don't get market rate due to CBA manipulation).
So now you are trying to move the goal posts to conform to your argument. Rookies are underpaid if they can start and perform. But they are still considered starters and their salary is taken into account in the rankings of salary. Some rookies are overpaid if taken high and turn out to be busts. It all averages out in the end.
This was cap charges for 2022. The 16th qb cap charge was around 12-13 million.
https://overthecap.com/position/quarterback/2022
This post was edited on 2/27/23 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 2/27/23 at 11:16 pm to saints5021
quote:
We win the division with Carr and are arguably a top 4 team in the NFC.
Holy shite. That's some serious delusions.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 7:02 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
So now you are trying to move the goal posts to
What? No. I never laid down any "goal posts". I'm critiquing your attempt at comparison as terrible and worthless to this discussion.
That criticism has remained consistent and logical. Nothing has changed in my argument.
quote:
Rookies are underpaid if they can start and perform. But they are still considered starters and their salary is taken into account in the rankings of salary.
Yes and I said that's irrelevant to the discussion so those data points are worthless.
That would only be a good argument from a person arguing for a tank or constant churn of 1st round QBs (b/c their salaries are low). Nobody is making that argument, so the data doesn't belong in this discussion.
quote:
This was cap charges for 2022.
Again, doesn't take into account the total cost.
Brady's hit in 2022 was about $12M.
His cap hit in 2023 is $35M
I"ll put it to you this way, the hit for 2023 averaged over his 3 years in Tampa Bay alone was almost $12M
This puts his 2022 cost at just under $24M, which is the number that should be used for this comparison.
*ETA: from what I can tell, it looks like Brady was paid $90M for the 3 years, so his actual average payment was $30M/year.
He signed a 2/50 with no restructuring then an extension that paid him $40M
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 7:06 am
Posted on 2/28/23 at 6:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What? No. I never laid down any "goal posts".
Goal posts, refs, chains, flags, all of it. SFP will cherry pick your argument, his own, the facts, the rumors etc.
He also thinks he is a GM. Loomising, but anti Loomis.
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 2/28/23 at 6:18 pm to msstate7
quote:Vikings won I believe 11/12 single possession games and then got beat in the 1st rd. They were fools gold. Based on regular season game, and our own record involved single possession games. We may not have been better, but we weren’t worse. With Carr yea we are better.
Didn't the Vikings have a negative point differential this season? They were a really fortunate team this year
Posted on 2/28/23 at 6:40 pm to paulbeasy
quote:
He also thinks he is a GM.
You do realize that “being GM” is part of what keeps this message board moving. It opens conversations amongst various fans, helps some people understand how the cap & contracts work, and is really not much different than the conversations about what FA/draft picks/play calling we all discuss from time to time
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News