- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cam's deal has voidable years
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:02 am
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:02 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. So, do we like $5 Million in new dead money for 2027 for 1 year of Cam, or would we prefer no Cam and no new dead money next year?
I'll personally take the $5 Million hit.
Remember, their other FA signings this year have had no voidable years.
5
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:06 am to bstaceyau19
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:11 am to geauxtigers87
If you don’t understand this mechanism by now you’re never going to get it
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:14 am to Proximo
its literally borrowing money at a negative interest rate.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:24 am to bstaceyau19
quote:
Voidable years make a return.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:15 am to Proximo
quote:
If you don’t understand this mechanism by now you’re never going to get it
Don't we have the ability to not do this, anymore, though?
This only makes sense if you're up against the cap and need to kick can. We're not in that position anymore.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:17 am to bstaceyau19
This 5m is the only major dead money that I see on next years cap. 2026 has 114m in dead money. They will have 21m in cap space before they start playing with it. They'll be fine.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:19 am to SlowFlowPro
That's what I thought as well. Per OTC, they still have $6.6M in cap space for 2026. They deferred $4.9M.
I guess they want to save that in case they want to make another move between now and the trade deadline without having to restructure anyone
Guess the benefit is, if they do nothing, the entire $6.6M rolls forward and absorbs the $4.9M anyway.
I guess they want to save that in case they want to make another move between now and the trade deadline without having to restructure anyone
Guess the benefit is, if they do nothing, the entire $6.6M rolls forward and absorbs the $4.9M anyway.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:47 am to bstaceyau19
Seems a good cheap one year deal spread to give more room this year.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:46 pm to bstaceyau19
They just can’t be great. The entire point of not bringing back the old players back was future cap
Posted on 6/19/26 at 1:18 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
its literally borrowing money at a negative interest rate.
What do you mean by that? Obviously, this will cost us in future years.
This team is spending future years money on this year for Cam Jordan. I view that as an easy to identify mistake.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 1:32 pm to moneyg
This type of money spread out is almost nothing…no reason to bother anyone.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 1:39 pm to moneyg
quote:
What do you mean by that? Obviously, this will cost us in future years.
borrowing 2 million on a bigger salary cap is a smaller % than the same 2 million being used from today's salary cap and %.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 1:57 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
borrowing 2 million on a bigger salary cap is a smaller % than the same 2 million being used from today's salary cap and %.
Any kind of backloaded deal could be justified by that logic.
I don’t agree with making these decisions with where we are in the rebuild. And I don’t agree with doing it for Cam.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 2:03 pm to moneyg
quote:
Any kind of backloaded deal could be justified by that logic.
no shite. its been the logic the entire time.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 2:21 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
no shite. its been the logic the entire time.
no shite. That's exactly what those complaining about are referencing.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 2:27 pm to KhalMingo
It's insanity lol the reaction not the deal.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 2:28 pm to moneyg
quote:
That's exactly what those complaining about are referencing.
those complaining are tards.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 4:29 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
those complaining are tards.
If you haven't figured out how dead money can negatively impact a team by now, I don't think you'll ever figure it out.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 4:38 pm to moneyg
What is smarter to you. Count Cams salary all this year or tey to keep a little more money on hand this year for FAs or extending the contracts of top players?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News