Article says Hill starting over Winston could be about color/ racism.

So how does this "writer" explain Bridgewater starting over Taysom?

Don't link that trash here.

I think it shows what people click on.

I guess so. It popped up in my feed about the Saints thought it was interesting headline.

quote:

---

White QB starts over more qualified Black QB because of “glimpses”

---

SMH.

Holy shite, what a moron. Does anyone actually believe Taysome is going to take all the snaps of course not. But you know who is now preparing for a ton of zone read and RPO action the Falcons.

I think Brees is near the end of his career and Winston has a large body of work to look at and a contract that ends after THIS year.

Taysom Hill doesn't have a huge body of work and a contract that ends after next year. It might be time to see if Taysom will be a contender to start for next year or if we need to resign Winston or bring someone else in to start.

Can't keep pushing whether the test of whether Taysom Hill can be a starter down the road forever.

90% Of the team is black...can diversity go both ways?

quote:

---

We play to win the game - Herm Edwards

---

and keep the black man down - Malcom Jenkins and Slant Man

lsutigers1992 wrote that

quote:

---

Your guys thoughts on this?

---

Typical journalism. This is one of the many reasons why I quit paying attention to any type of media.