Started By
Message

Advocate: With Ochsner's Support, Saints pitched 35% Dome Occupancy for Games in PRESEASON

Posted on 10/20/20 at 9:24 am
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141182 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 9:24 am
NOLA Advocate

quote:

The New Orleans Saints have been locked in a public battle with Mayor LaToya Cantrell for weeks over whether the team should be allowed to fill the Mercedes-Benz Superdome to 25% capacity for games, a stalemate that escalated to the point where team officials said they might play in LSU’s Tiger Stadium if Cantrell wouldn’t relent.

But in August, before the season began, the Saints made a pitch to Gov. John Bel Edwards for a bolder idea: 35% capacity — a plan that would put almost 24,000 fans in the stadium for games.

A Saints presentation, obtained Monday through a public records request to the governor’s office, was bolstered with quotes from Ochsner Health System officials who voiced their support for the idea. The plan featured a detailed “seating manifest methodology” that showed how patrons would be spaced from several angles. In all, 23,875 people would have been allowed in the stadium under the proposal, to which Edwards did not agree.


On Sept. 1, Edwards agreed to a plan to allow fans at the Superdome, but the details weren’t publicly announced at the time. Christina Stephens, a spokeswoman for Edwards, said the Sept. 1 plan would have allowed 25% capacity, in line with the Phase 3 rules that the governor announced publicly nine days later.

In the Saints’ proposal for 35% capacity, 6-foot social distancing wasn’t quite possible on the aisles. Seats on either side of the aisles are at most 5.7 feet apart — or less depending on the section — when measuring from the approximate location of patrons’ heads, according to the presentation. The 5.7-foot distance comes from the 200 level at the Superdome; the distance between aisle seats in the 600 level from Row 6 to the top is only 5.2 feet, according to the presentation.

...

The presentation quoted Dr. Robert Hart, Ochsner’s Chief Medical Officer, as saying “we are actually OK with the 35% capacity seating plan despite the horizontal distance being less than 6 feet, but with the information provided here I think I could give my support to this plan. It gives some variability in the cohort size, which I think is ideal and much better than the 37% and 50% models.”

“I can support the 35% plan with the distance adjustments that have been pointed out,” added Dr. Katherine Baumgarten, Ochsner’s medical director of infection control and prevention, according to the presentation. “It is reasonable and would meet the CDC guidance.”

...

The document further illustrates the Saints’ desire to welcome paying customers into the stadium, which has put team officials at odds with Cantrell’s administration as New Orleans charts its own, more strict path on coronavirus restrictions than Edwards’ administration. Saints officials sent the proposal for 35% occupancy to the governor’s office ahead of an Aug. 11 meeting between Edwards, Cantrell and team officials, said Stephens. She said the governor reviewed the plan ahead of the meeting.
This post was edited on 10/20/20 at 9:25 am
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
57489 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 9:34 am to
Not allowing fans has never been about public safety
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71134 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 9:34 am to
Party of science!
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64366 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Not allowing fans has never been about public safety





Nope. Just get on top of the superdome and throw money to the politicians.





Posted by Cheesy Beaver
Kenna brah
Member since Dec 2014
4424 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Not allowing fans has never been about public safety



megalomania
Posted by MSTiger33
Member since Oct 2007
20384 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 9:58 am to
Sounds like you are trying to be a bully.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112667 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 10:00 am to
Lester disagrees. LaToya is saving lives.
Posted by Swagga
504
Member since Dec 2009
16147 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 10:03 am to
quote:

“I can support the 35% plan with the distance adjustments that have been pointed out,” added Dr. Katherine Baumgarten, Ochsner’s medical director of infection control and prevention, according to the presentation. “It is reasonable and would meet the CDC guidance.”



This lady is far more qualified than avegno to be speaking on something like this and Latoya has said she’s listening to the science.

I guess it’s only science if it’s her approved science.
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10200 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 10:05 am to
You need to stop bullying Latoya with science. She knows what's best for us and she damn sure ain't listenin to no bullying form Ochsner.
Posted by WhiskeyPlease
Member since Sep 2018
1959 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 10:49 am to
Democrats: Engineered with zero logic
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
15638 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:45 pm to
The amount of technical effort put out over this damn 6 foot forcefield.... all while we stand in concession lines and piss 6 inches from each other. It's so futile and silly. Demonstrates this has always been about optics.
Posted by D011ahbi11
Member since Jun 2007
13621 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:47 pm to
The Cantrell supporters response has been “Ochsner is the Saints biggest sponsor, of course they support it”
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58138 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

This lady is far more qualified than avegno to be speaking on something like this and Latoya has said she’s listening to the science.


This.
I noticed a little blurb in the Gambit the other day supporting Latoya because she has stood up to the Saints and won't back down until the data supports fans back in the stadium.
And still nobody will fcking ask her where is the data and what is the goal.
Posted by Mufassa
Member since Aug 2012
1664 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 1:16 pm to
Moe?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

“Ochsner is the Saints biggest sponsor, of course they support it”


Not going to lie, when I saw Ochsner I thought, perhaps this would be better coming from a source that isn't a team sponsor.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 1:31 pm to
Heard on radio that less than 20,000 fans and the Saints basically lose money when considering all the gameday staff they would have to hire.
Posted by ShootingsBricks4Life
Member since May 2017
2601 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Not going to lie, when I saw Ochsner I thought, perhaps this would be better coming from a source that isn't a team sponsor.



So you rather Dave and Buster's give you a medical breakdown?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

So you rather Dave and Buster's give you a medical breakdown?


Or perhaps another medical system that isn't a Saints sponsor?
Posted by oVo
Member since Dec 2013
11804 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 1:47 pm to
You keep Buster’s out of this
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Or perhaps another medical system that isn't a Saints sponsor?




Well, how about the City commission another for verification.... even ask the SAINTS to pay for it?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram