Started By
Message

re: Yearly NBA trade thread, BREAKING: Mark Williams trade rescinded by Lakers

Posted on 12/17/24 at 11:30 pm to
Posted by Aussie_Pelican
Melbourne
Member since Oct 2016
1250 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 11:30 pm to
Porter for BI straight up..get it done.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17321 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 5:41 am to
quote:

Porter for BI straight up..get it done.

Can’t happen, with Denver in the apron they would have to send out more salary than they take in. BI makes about 300k more than Porter, so Denver would have to add a salary to him. Becomes tricky because Denver is in the 2nd apron, so they have to shed quite a bit to drop under, which means we would need a 3rd team involved.

Something like this would work IMO:
Nugs: Ingram, Theis
Pistons: MPJ, JRE
Pels: Saric, Thompson, Stewart

I think Denver’s highest motivator is the salary shedding as their roster is getting very expensive.

Pistons can sell MPJ as a co-star for Cade

Pels get a young defensive wing they would love in Ausur, a physical big with an attitude in Stewart that we need, and Saric is just salary. Gets us 8 million below the tax also, giving us an advantage in any future trade talks for CJ, Zion etc as teams know we don’t have to trade them to shed salary.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 6:32 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103111 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 6:29 am to
Theoretically, Denver can send out Porter and a low cost player with the latter being on a TPE to us.

Problem is that it still means we have to dump salary elsewhere to go under the tax.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17321 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 6:33 am to
You’re correct, I looked at the numbers wrong, Denver is not in the 2nd apron they’re hard capped at the 2nd apron.

I still would do that deal though, don’t want MPJ on this team with his back issues, that contract will be a nightmare for us IMO.

Plus as you said, that would push us further into the tax, which we will not do.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 6:34 am
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31889 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:57 am to
Gotta acquire assets and not mpj like you said - gotta wonder if there's a way to obtain ivey in any of this. He's the ideal young guard you would like to chase in any of this, but if so - I think Ingram or zion goes to them for Harris (filler) and ivey - not mpj.

another team to consider is still Sacramento, they were inquiring about Ingram in the offseason, need more shooting, and Murray has severely disappointed since an elite rookie year shooting. They may be willing to go top heavy - huerter, lyles (fillers), Murray, and picks would work. If not they blow this all up similarly to us.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 8:03 am
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17321 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Gotta acquire assets and not mpj like you said - gotta wonder if there's a way to obtain ivey in any of this. He's the ideal young guard you would like to chase in any of this, but if so - I think Ingram or zion goes to them for Harris (filler) and ivey - not mpj.

Problem with Ivey is he only has one year under contract after this season, so we would only have a limited time to evaluate his fit with us and then pretty much have to decide whether to sign him to 100 million plus deal this offseason or go into the season with him as an expiring/RFA.

I would prefer a rookie or 2nd year player.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 8:31 am
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31889 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:18 am to
Thompson fits that, but he is so underwhelming so far. He's a bad shooter, can't even hit ft's consistently. Good defender but we can't just hope everyone turns into a herb jones (serviceable, not even remotely good 3pt shooter).
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1880 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:53 am to
I said this in the other trade thread. I agree on paper that DET seems like a logical trade partner, but I don’t think they are looking to make any moves to seriously improve yet. DET 1st pick is owed to NYK, but it’s 1-13 protected this year, 1-11 in 26, 1-9 in 27, and then converts to 2nds. I’m not sure they want to hold off improving for that long, but with them already borderline play-in and with strength of this draft, I don’t see them doing anything that would jeopardize that pick until at least next season
Posted by Balsamic_duck
Member since Jun 2017
4312 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

said this in the other trade thread. I agree on paper that DET seems like a logical trade partner, but I don’t think they are looking to make any moves to seriously improve yet. DET 1st pick is owed to NYK, but it’s 1-13 protected this year, 1-11 in 26, 1-9 in 27, and then converts to 2nds. I’m not sure they want to hold off improving for that long, but with them already borderline play-in and with strength of this draft, I don’t see them doing anything that would jeopardize that pick until at least next season


I think CJ makes a ton of sense for Detroit, they need shooting badly and CJ can provide some vet leadership. CJ’s contract ends before Ivey and Duren’s extensions would kick in.

THJ + a 2nd or two works financially.

We get out of the tax this year and get off CJ’s contract next year

Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17321 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 5:05 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

This is floating around, but unless Milwaukee is able to get a third team involved to take on Middleton it can’t happen.

If Detroit would do Middleton for THJ, then CJ to Bucks, Portis and THJ to Pels, Kris to Pistons works

Problem comes in Milwaukee not having draft capital
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 5:11 pm
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7732 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:07 pm to
Bro, bringing Unc Bobby Portis over to punch Zion in the face would be well worth it. I’m in on this deal.
Posted by Pendulum
Member since Jan 2009
7907 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:14 pm to
What's the point of that trade, to do cj a solid? The only player that seems to make sense on their roster is brook Lopez but he's expiring.
Posted by TechTiger
Running an easy 10
Member since Feb 2007
1455 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:20 pm to
The only player that seems to make sense on their roster is brook Lopez but he's expiring.

That’s a good thing…it’s a salary saving option. We can’t afford everyone’s salary next year.
Posted by PELsu
Member since Oct 2021
1708 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:21 pm to
Bucks can’t aggregate salaries and also can’t take on more than they send out. Can’t happen. Hate these fake rumors
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17321 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

What's the point of that trade

As I said what complicates it is Milwaukee not having draft assets to send out. We would need at least a pick and so would Detroit. Now you could obviously get even more teams involved to get other assets to make the Pels and Pistons happy, but that would be dependent on another team valuing Middleton or Portis or Pat enough to give up assets.
quote:

The only player that seems to make sense on their roster is brook Lopez but he's expiring.

He doesn’t make enough money. It would only be doable with Midldeton and Portis or Connaughton salaries going out as Milwaukee would have to send out enough to get below the 2nd apron.
quote:

Bucks can’t aggregate salaries

They can if they go below the 2nd apron. Middleton and one of Portis or Pat C going out while they only bring back CJ would work. Only way that works is to get Detroit involved.

If they send out Middleton and Pat C that would leave them around 1.2 million below the 2nd apron, if they sent out Portis instead that would have them around 4.5 million below. Either trade gets us out of the tax also, obviously more so with Pat C than with Portis.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 8:11 pm
Posted by PELsu
Member since Oct 2021
1708 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:26 pm to
Alright, scratch that. You’re right
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7732 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:29 pm to
Just read a trade proposal on the internet made by a guy that follows the Pacers

He suggested, Zion for Obi Toppin, Nesmith, Mathurin and a 2028 1st

I’d honestly be all over that. The Pels reportedly wanted Mathurin in the draft. Nesmith and Toppin both defend decently and hit 3’s. Current Toppin is actually more athletic than current Zion.

A trade like this would be a get out of jail free card for the Pels. We could’ve gotten better value a few years ago, but I like the sound of 3 solid, high character, modern nba players and a pick over Zion at this point.

Murray, Jose
Herb, Mathurin
Trey, Nesmith
Obi
Missi

Hawk, Boston as other pieces

Plus whatever we get from Ingram and CJ trades and whoever our draft pick is this summer
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31889 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:49 pm to
Need to add another 1st. You're about to end up paying mathurin, but a plus sized sg who can play off ball can do you some good. I just worry his ceiling is fully dependent on a pg like murray existing or your kind of screwed.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17321 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 4:31 am to
Not nearly enough value for Zion, would need multiple 1sts and swaps
Posted by DLBalla
Member since Jul 2018
222 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 4:43 am to
Which no team will give up at this point. So it's either accept a reasonably low offer now to move on from the Z experience, or wait it out and hope he plays again and doesn't get hurt and rebuilds some value.
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 4:50 am
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 46
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 46Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram