Started By
Message

re: What do we do with our treasure chest?

Posted on 1/2/23 at 8:55 am to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112848 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 8:55 am to
quote:

JV, DG, Jaxson, 3 1st.....

Does that get us Bam?
Swap Dyson and Trey for 2 of the above and that's in the range of what it would take to get Bam.


But again, we can't really do that because we can't afford it due to luxury tax implications. CJ would have to go out as part of the deal.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112848 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 8:56 am to
quote:

0000000% think Ayton is a thought on the table but I still believe this team stays untouched this year
Same as Bam, CJ would have to go out in that deal.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43447 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Same as Bam, CJ would have to go out in that deal.


Eh not neccessarily. If we look at it from a binary perspective sure. However, Ayton and Monty have been at each others necks all season and with new ownership comes a bit of a wildcard where maybe they want to get off the books a disgruntled employee.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112848 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Eh not neccessarily
Sure, in the literal sense it could be done but why would we want to trade all this depth for Ayton and no depth? It would involve not extending any young players and trading guys to ensure we have more min and small contracts to make it work.

We're not going to be a perennial tax paying team, no chance.

And having 4 players making over $30 mil would essentially guarantee that.


If you make that deal, you may as well add Herb and Trey and less picks since you'd be committing to them not being on the team for a 2nd contract.
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 9:11 am
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43447 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 9:11 am to
I dont think Herb is going to be as expensive at this point. If someone is willing to give him a lot of money you got to let him go.
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2355 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:04 am to
quote:

I dont think Herb is going to be as expensive at this point. If someone is willing to give him a lot of money you got to let him go.


Doubt any team that's NOT a serious playoff contender would be interested in paying Herb the big bucks. He's not the type player you go out of your way to get, unless his type is what you really need, to put you over the top come playoff time, and especially if you have an offensive system, where Herb doesn't hurt you very much, assuming he ends up stuck below 30% on 3s of course.

Most think there are about 4 different options on how you try and figure out the best way to "use" a limited type player as Herb. We are in phase one...the best option if it works. If it doesn't work, you then move to #2 etc...each level being a bit less advantageous than the previous.

I assume, by the amount of time & effort that the Pels have already put in on Herb, that WG & company think he is going to be worth the effort. In other words, they think Herb is, at least, one of the top 5 wing defenders in the NBA (if not the best) If Herb turns out to be just a very good defender...I'm not sure I see the Pels sticking with him, if somebody comes along with the need (& money) to sign him. JMO



Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:12 am to
Nobody else is going to sign Herb when it's time for his 2nd contract. At this stage he's clearly not worth more than MLE money, and guys that are MLE or lower are never targets when they are RFAs because an offer sheet ties up your cap space for a few days, often only to get matched. That's how the system is designed to work and why nobody made an offer for Josh Hart.

The question for Herb is can he improve enough on offense to become a great value on an MLE deal, or will he stagnate and become another 3&D wing without enough 3 that gets passed around the league as contract filler in trades.
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 10:18 am
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2355 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:21 am to
I admit...I'm pretty much in the dark when it comes to money matters in the NBA. I just think there will probably be some teams that might find a "Herb" to be quite a bit more valuable given their current situation, than the Pels will...and it would be totally understandable why the Pels might feel this way...and move him.

Who knows, maybe Herb will suddenly start shooting 40% from 3 & we can all look back & laugh at this discussion. (Edit: I would settle for 35%)
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 10:31 am
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:31 am to
quote:

I just think there will probably be some teams that might find a "Herb" to be quite a bit more valuable given their current situation, than the Pels will...and it would be totally understandable why the Pels might feel this way...and move him.


The Pels still might move him on an MLE level deal depending on their tolerance for the tax. However, the Restricted Free Agency system is designed to tilt things heavily in the home team's favor. If you are targeting an RFA, you either work out a S&T in advance, or that RFA target is one of the biggest fish on your list making it worth tying your hands for 2 days once FA starts.

So like I said, Mid level and lower guys are almost never targets because you don't take a big swing on a player that probably isn't a starter for you.

The Pels lost Lonzo the way they did because of a combination of the Pels/Lonzo not being on the same page for terms of continuing the relationship, and Klutch started outmaneuvering Griff the previous season. If the Pels had actually wanted to keep Lonzo near the price Chicago paid, Chicago probably would have never gone after him with an offer sheet and thrown all of their other moves that offseason into jeopardy.
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 10:32 am
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2355 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:39 am to
Thanks...I understood about half of that. Now, I consider myself to be one those MOST dangerous people. The guy that knows juuuuust enough...to make a bad decision
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 11:54 am to
quote:

JV, DG, Jaxson, 3 1st..... Does that get us Bam?Swap Dyson and Trey for 2 of the above and that's in the range of what it would take to get Bam.


That would be an incredible overpay for Bam, who can’t shoot.
Posted by BamaPelican
Member since Apr 2022
437 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Bam, who can’t shoot


100%…Bam has attempted 60 3pts in 6 seasons and made 8 (13%)…he makes JV look like Steph Curry. Talk about jamming up the paint.
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7913 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 12:24 pm to
Yeah I don’t get the infatuation with Bam

He also got torched by AD in the bubble

He’s honestly one of my least favorite players in the NBA bc he has hype, but when it’s time to show up, he folds.

He honestly plays a lot like Larry Nance, but has higher usage, and makes 5 times more money.

I’m not trading 2 decent players, 2 of Herb, Trey, and Dyson, and 3 first rd picks for that

That would be horrific.
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 12:29 pm
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
26665 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 12:33 pm to
Has anyone suggested hookers and blow yet?
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 12:34 pm
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
32280 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 12:37 pm to
You keep the team intact this year. But going into offseason, decide if Hayes is worth it or not.

I think it's decided we need a dependable shooter and a truly solid option for back up center
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112848 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

That would be an incredible overpay for Bam, who can’t shoot
It's infinitely closer to what an actual deal would look like than JV/DG/Jax
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7913 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 7:20 pm to
Probably true, but wouldn’t you agree that would be more counterproductive than good?

Trading 3-5 players (all of whom are assets in different ways), plus 3 firsts, for a Max contract guy who helps defensively most nights, but still can’t actually guard the truly elite bigs or wings and also can’t shoot?

Your price might be right, but I’d rather just try to draft and develop a Bam type player than trade a billion assets for actual Bam and pay the luxury tax.

Zion is 22 and Ingram is 25. If they were PG13 and Kawhi’s age, I’d be more on board to move all in.
Posted by PelsForLife
Member since May 2019
475 posts
Posted on 1/2/23 at 8:18 pm to
What would it take to get two of Kennard, Lee, Burks? We need to get rid of Temple/DG and get actual shooters on this team.
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 8:19 pm
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

It's infinitely closer to what an actual deal would look like than JV/DG/Jax


No it’s not infinitely closer, because that would be an overpay. The Heat are declining, because Bam hasn’t reached his ceiling, because he can’t shoot.

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112848 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

No it’s not infinitely closer,
Of course it is
quote:

because that would be an overpay
And your offer would be a an underpay so how does your statement prove your point?


At any rate, my point wasn't what is or isn't an over or under pay, it's what an actual deal would look like. And it would obviously look a lot less like your deal and a lot more like the one I mentioned.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram