Started By
Message

re: Teams very interested in Jose and CJ, Zion a hot commodity

Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

We just tear it up with Ingram


We have as many wins with Ingram and the G League Express as we do with Zion/Trey/Dejounte/CJ starting
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

OR we are tanking, have no reason to over play him and risk injury, and you are dumb.


Zion risks injury getting off the couch. If we can never take him out of the bubble wrap, what's the point? Can the guy stay in shape or not?
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5743 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

If we can never take him out of the bubble wrap, what's the point? Can the guy stay in shape or not?


Did you just ignore the whole tanking part of that post and the unnecessary injury part just so you could act like you are proving some stupid arse point?

Y'all literally want Zion to play more so he gets hurt. If he plays more minutes and plays well y'all will still say "trade him" and be miserable fricks. If he does play more and get hurt y'all will say "see" and be miserable fricks.

Just shut the frick up. You will most likely bitch about the trade return for Zion too. No pleasing you pussies.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 12:54 pm
Posted by cajun_tiger
Member since Jun 2012
235 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:46 pm to
quote:


Turning a 27 year old who is averaging 22/5/5 on 37% from 3 and 86% from the FT line and is capable of creating his own shot anytime he wants for a declining 33 year old center and a 30 year old center who can't play at the end of games b/c he can't defend or shoot FT's and also is the type of center that we've proven doesn't work with Zion, as well as a late 1st round pick was a good trade.


I think we should wait and see what kind of deal BI gets before making any sweeping declarations about this trade. Personally I've been in the trade BI camp since last year. He is a fine player, but he is flawed. I think Julius Randle and Bradley Beal are very good comparisons. Great counting stats but the advanced stats are average at best. Consistently a BPM of 2 or less, WS per 48 is average, VORP under 2, negative net rating for his tenure with the Pels. At some point all those counting stats have to be a net positive on the court and it just hasn't been. At least not for 40m or more per year. Like I said, 30m is around his worth with this new CBA and I think anyone who gives him more is gonna be using picks to get off that deal in a couple years.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

If we were Zion would be playing more than 26-28 minutes a night


He's -27 over the last 5 games

On the season, he only has a positive net in 8 of 15 games he has played.

He's -18 on the season
Posted by Macintosh
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
55301 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:52 pm to
Marc Spears just reported CJ is staying
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Y'all literally want Zion to play more so he gets hurt.


No, I want him playing more because I don't believe he is capable, and if he isn't capable, we need to move on. Using a tank as further excuses for his lazy, entitled bullshite just means he'll continue not being in proper NBA shape.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13455 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:16 pm to
quote:


Marc Spears just reported CJ is staying
Shocker! Griffin probably preparing his extension as we speak.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71838 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

have no reason to over play him and risk injury


Please define overplay for me, since I am so dumb. And why limit this to Zion then? CJ, for example, is averaging 33 min a game. Why? We are tanking. Sit him.

If this is the approach with Zion, then the plan should be to keep him. Otherwise the optics are exactly what I stated. He can’t stay healthy and he can’t maintain consistent minutes because he is too lazy to stay in shape. And his value is less.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71838 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Did you just ignore the whole tanking part of that post and the unnecessary injury part just so you could act like you are proving some stupid arse point?


This is the dumbest fricking take.

We are not sitting him bc we are tanking. Otherwise we would have 0 starters averaging 30+ min a game. That’s how you tank. CJ is staying, as we now know, so why is he playing so much?
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
2687 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:21 pm to
One thing I’ve learned is to not address Galactic Queer when it comes to Zion and not address ghost2most when it comes to BI. They come into every thread and say the same shite over and over about their hatred for those 2 players. It’s pretty tiresome.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71838 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:23 pm to
I’m neither of the posters you mentioned. But pointing out obvious facts is NOT “hatred”.

We aren’t sitting Zion bc we are tanking. We are sitting him bc of the risk of injury, yes, which is in part due to the fact that he can’t stay in shape enough to manage the minutes required of a superstar in a long, grueling nba season. Period. He has yet to do it since the pels drafted him.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5743 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

This is the dumbest fricking take.

We are not sitting him bc we are tanking. Otherwise we would have 0 starters averaging 30+ min a game. That’s how you tank.


The only "starters" that played +30min last game were Trey/ Missi???

So by your exact definition of "tanking" we are, you dumbass.

And to make it better (3) of our "starters" are already at 0 minutes a game for the year.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 1:34 pm
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
2687 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:30 pm to
Cool
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71838 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:34 pm to
Last game? That’s your metric?

We have multiple players averaging 30+ on the season.

TREY AVERAGES 35 MIN A GAME.

I only mentioned CJ bc by all accounts, until a few min ago, he was considered on the trading block. So working him to the bone to get more value would make sense. BUT WE ARE NOT TRADING HIM.

you dumb mother frickers will do anything to ignore what is right in front of you.

Zion can not maintain the minutes. Period. He’s not as out of shape as he was before, but he is still not at a level where he can play Trey-like minutes. And he never has.

Genuinely answer this, if we are tanking and that’s why we are sitting Zion, why are CJ and Trey both getting so much usage? I’m open ears
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 1:37 pm
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40391 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Dantheman504


Everything alright on the home front? Your wife leaving you or something? For weeks now you've just been pretty much telling everyone to frick off and stfu and how everyone is a moron in every post. It's getting old.
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1880 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Our record is worse when he plays. The only teams we've beaten with Zion this year are teams we've also beaten without Zion this year.

Cold hard facts


We are 4-11 with Zion this year (.266 win percentage)

We are 8-28 without him (.222 win percentage)

We also beat IND and POR the first time we played them with Zion, but haven’t beat them without him.

So literally nothing you said is correct

Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
12748 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:50 pm to
You should post our record with Ingram this year.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5743 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

For weeks now you've just been pretty much telling everyone to frick off and stfu and how everyone is a moron in every post. It's getting old.


Oh I've been stressed and definitely slightly excessive at times on here so Ill own that.

But there are some miserable fricks here that cry no matter what happens.

My frustration on here comes from the fact that fans actually think Jose is meaningful in any way to this teams future rebuild and some also think having CJ on this roster means anything.

If more fans were less attached to meaningful players on losing teams the overall environment would be less hostile as a whole.

The whole point is to win a championship. The people that honestly think 33 y/o CJ or already peaked Jose have any influence over that is tough.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 1:56 pm
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71838 posts
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

But there are some miserable fricks here that cry no matter what happens.


Dude shut the frick up

We are one of the worst teams in the nba, what do you expect?

Log the frick off you sanctimonious little bitch
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 1:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram