Started By
Message

re: Sons, what’s your 2023-24 final prediction?

Posted on 10/16/23 at 11:31 am to
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10828 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 11:31 am to
I saw that graphic before. It's from March. The season ended in April I think. The site is a paid site, to view. I'm not curious enough to pay. Did you access?
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10828 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 11:44 am to
quote:

And tell me what team lost their two best players for half the season or more.


Ingram didn't miss half the season.

Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
7937 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 12:59 pm to
He missed 37 games; 41 is half. Really big deal there chief. Zion played 29 games and missed 53; well more than half. Combined they played 74 games of a possible 164. Again, find me a team that had their best two players miss that much time. I'll be waiting.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
4984 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 1:55 pm to
Cunningham: 12 games
Bogdanovic: 59 games

Got ‘em
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10828 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

I'll be waiting.


You can do the research yourself. You are asking for something very specific and somewhat arbitrary. 'One that missed most of the year and another that missed a big chunk'. There are a few teams that had similar circumstances (Suns, Lakers, Nets, Wolves, Pistons, Bucks, Clippers..). We'd have to go through each and debate impact. It all comes back to complaining about injuries. Everybody deals with them..
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

You are asking for something very specific and somewhat arbitrary
Your 2 best players missing more games than any other team's top 2 players is not arbitrary at all.

You're basically arguing that BI/Zion missing time is no different than Jose/Nance missing time.

quote:

There are a few teams that had similar circumstances (Suns, Lakers, Nets, Wolves, Pistons, Bucks, Clippers..).
Any of those teams had their 2 best players 90 games or more?

quote:

We'd have to go through each and debate impact.
None had players with the impact of Zion/BI miss 90 games or more.
quote:

It all comes back to complaining about injuries. Everybody deals with them..
So, you're of the belief that injuries affected all 30 teams exactly equally last season, and no team were adversely affected for the better or worse due to injuries, right?
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10828 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 3:07 pm to
Did you pay to see the site? How did you pull the information?

quote:

Your 2 best players missing more games than any other team's top 2 players is not arbitrary at all.


It is by nature. Why pick out that number? Why not 3? Why not all staters? Some teams don't have a big 2 or 3. So injuries affect everyone differently.

quote:

Any of those teams had their 2 best players 90 games or more?



Once again, why 90? So if I find groups at 60, 70 or 80 (but more injuries in the extended core) they don't matter as much?

quote:

So, you're of the belief that injuries affected all 30 teams exactly equally last season, and no team were adversely affected for the better or worse due to injuries, right?


I'm of the belief that bitching about injuries for the better part of a decade is weak. I'm certain both Zion and Ingram could have played more. But they decided not to do it. I just hate every argument around team performance coming down to injuries and we are the only team that deals with them..
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Once again, why 90?
Seriously? You think I made that number up?

quote:

So if I find groups at 60, 70 or 80 (but more injuries in the extended core) they don't matter as much?
No, not as much as the Pels missing their best 2 players for 90 games. And more injuries to the extended core, good luck finding that since the Pels were also top 3 in total games missed, meaning other guys were missing games too.

quote:

So injuries affect everyone differently.
Quite literally the point others are trying to get across to you that you are disagreeing with.
quote:

I'm of the belief that bitching about injuries for the better part of a decade is weak.
Some bitch about it, sure. But simply stating facts is not bitching. There is a difference between an explanation and an excuse. Me saying the Kings had better injury luck than the Pels last season is not an excuse, it is an explanation.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10828 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 3:49 pm to
Seriously, how did you get the information about lost games?

quote:

No, not as much as the Pels missing their best 2 players for 90 games. And more injuries to the extended core, good luck finding that since the Pels were also top 3 in total games missed, meaning other guys were missing games too.


I'm not even trying and could go straight to the Bucks. Their big 3 missed 83 games (to the Pelicans big 3 missing 97). Bucks were one of the oldest teams in the league and had tons of guys miss tons of games.

They got no leeway from anyone. People still killed them after being ousted by the Heat.

quote:

Quite literally the point others are trying to get across to you that you are disagreeing with.


No they are not. They are hiding behind, like people do every year.

quote:

Me saying the Kings had better injury luck than the Pels last season is not an excuse, it is an explanation


Little of this and a little of that. Sure, it's a factor. But we can't blame it every year. Even more, maybe it means something, like don't build around injury prone or soft players..
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

Seriously, how did you get the information about lost games?

See the tweet I posted, go to that Twitter handle.
quote:

I'm not even trying and could go straight to the Bucks. Their big 3 missed 83 games (to the Pelicans big 3 missing 97). Bucks were one of the oldest teams in the league and had tons of guys miss tons of games.
So much healthier than the Pels in that their best 3 players missed less games than the Pels best 2 players...huge difference in health compared to the Bucks for the worst for the Pels.
quote:

They got no leeway from anyone. People still killed them after being ousted by the Heat.

A lot of people recognized Giannis was limited in that series due to injury.
quote:

But we can't blame it every year.
You can when your best player averages 14.5 games played the past 2 seasons. Again, not an excuse but a factual explanation.
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
14116 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 4:19 pm to
Ingram is a couple years of retirement - the end is near

With Zion exiting his prime and Ingram nearing retirement, I expect the pels to be the worst team in the league.
This post was edited on 10/16/23 at 4:21 pm
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10828 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

See the tweet I posted, go to that Twitter handle.


It's a paid site. Or is there another I missed?

quote:

So much healthier than the Pels in that their best 3 players missed less games than the Pels best 2 players...huge difference in health compared to the Bucks for the worst for the Pels.


I don't understand why we can't extend out to 3 players or the starters. Are we really that top heavy? If so, that's irresponsible team construction.

quote:

You can when your best player averages 14.5 games played the past 2 seasons. Again, not an excuse but a factual explanation.


It's both. Especially when it's spun forward as a reason they should be dramatically better this year. I don't get why it would be different this coming season. We are never going to have perfect health. Especially when a lot of our players choose not to play (then blame injuries)..
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31452 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 5:15 pm to
45 wins

If healthy

35

If unhealthy
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

I don't understand why we can't extend out to 3 players or the starters
Not sure why you're fixated on that, you literally confirmed that our best 2 players missed more games than Milwaukee's best 3 players, that is a HUGE difference.
quote:

It's both. Especially when it's spun forward as a reason they should be dramatically better this year.
You don't think we'd be better this year compared to last year if BI and Zion both play, say, 65 games or so?

Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
7937 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

I don't understand why we can't extend out to 3 players or the starters.


That's just it, the Pels injuries were extended past just BI and Zion. . its bad enough when your top two payers can't stay healthy. But then when your third best player plays pretty much the entire season with a bad hand that immediately requires surgery when the season ends; when really important rotational players like Jose and Larry miss a bunch of time, when another starter (Herb) misses almost twenty games, it makes it hard to consistently win in this league. Call it an excuse or an explanation, but it WAS reality last year. To deny that is just being obtuse.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62443 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 5:40 pm to
Hollinger finally writing something about the Pels we can all agree with.

quote:

JC’s Pops @JDub9911

@johnhollinger describes how I feel about the Pelicans to a tee.



Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
28703 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 5:43 pm to
That is embarrassingly very truthful.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 10/16/23 at 5:45 pm to
Well done, Hollinger

41 wins is the perfect frick it I have no idea prediction for the Pels.
Posted by tibebecolston
Member since Mar 2013
4452 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 10:44 pm to
49 - 33

Best Zion year we’ve seen or ever will see may very well be this year.
BI does his thing and flourishes with open mid range shots and more aggressive catch and shoot 3’s.

CJ thrives as a 3rd and 4th option and open shooting opportunities as a result.

Herb continues to improve on offense and becomes a dangerous corner 3 shooter.

JV does his usual.

Trey comes back and after a month or so he’s the best Trey we’ve ever seen.

Nance, Jose, Dyson stay healthy and excel as a diverse defensive unit with some 3 point shooting and rebounding, and with Trey making them one of the best benches in the league.

The rookie steps in and hits a few 3’s regularly despite struggling on D.


5 seed and go up against Lakers in the first round.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13094 posts
Posted on 10/19/23 at 11:07 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/19/23 at 11:09 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram