- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Simmons: “Top 5 Dumbest Trades of this decade”
Posted on 6/26/25 at 4:59 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 6/26/25 at 4:59 pm to Fun Bunch
Shams just said it. What if Queen ends up becoming an all star? Then all this conversation will just fade away into nothing. And folks will be saying they know he was gonna be good the whole time. No way to say "this is a top 5 worst trade" 12 damn hours after its made. Lets see what happens.
0
Posted on 6/26/25 at 5:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
It's just hilarious to me that Dumars started trying to make this trade at #9, and no one would take it until Atlanta at #13. If Toronto had taken the offer at #9, then SFP would tell you that we made a much better trade, even though we would have given up the same thing for the same player.
According to the logic of SFP, a Derik Queen taken at #9 has a much higher variance than a Derik Queen taken at #13. I've read a lot of stupid arguments here on TD, but this one is pretty high up there.
According to the logic of SFP, a Derik Queen taken at #9 has a much higher variance than a Derik Queen taken at #13. I've read a lot of stupid arguments here on TD, but this one is pretty high up there.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:05 pm to Fun Bunch
Simmons has been gratuitously mean-spirited toward the Pels over years. His hyperbole is not surprising.
It should have been a protected pick, so it is an unnecessarily risky move. But the Pels have traded all sorts of 1s, including one to acquire Steven Adams and one to get rid of him a year later.
They’re just trying to get the team competitive and moving.
It should have been a protected pick, so it is an unnecessarily risky move. But the Pels have traded all sorts of 1s, including one to acquire Steven Adams and one to get rid of him a year later.
They’re just trying to get the team competitive and moving.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 11:59 pm to AOC4PREZ2028
quote:
Dumars built from the ground up a team that made it to six straight ECF appearances
So long ago it’s meaningless. The league is way different now
Posted on 6/27/25 at 12:03 am to chalmetteowl
Hyping up Dumars for his accomplishments from over 2 decades ago is such a desperation move. Especially when everything after that was an absolute train wreck
Posted on 6/27/25 at 8:41 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
So long ago it’s meaningless.
You are wrong.
Anyone who would rather have Bill Simmons run their organization over Joe Dumars is an abject moron. I don't know how else to put it.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 9:22 am to PELsu
There’s not a person in the media or on this board who knows how this trade will work out for the Pelicans. In fact, nobody can really calculate the percentages one way or the other. It’s just bloviating at this point..
Posted on 6/27/25 at 1:53 pm to AOC4PREZ2028
quote:
Anyone who would rather have Bill Simmons run their organization over Joe Dumars is an abject moron. I don't know how else to put it.
We don't know how Simmons would do. We know Dumars will be mediocre at best and calamitous at worst. He needs to prove he can build a team in the pace and space era
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 1:56 pm
Page 6 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News